Cargando…

Data for improvement and clinical excellence: protocol for an audit with feedback intervention in long-term care

BACKGROUND: There is considerable evidence about the effectiveness of audit coupled with feedback, although few audit with feedback interventions have been conducted in long-term care (LTC) settings to date. In general, the effects have been found to be modest at best, although in settings where the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sales, Anne E, Schalm, Corinne
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20939926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-74
_version_ 1782189383823130624
author Sales, Anne E
Schalm, Corinne
author_facet Sales, Anne E
Schalm, Corinne
author_sort Sales, Anne E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is considerable evidence about the effectiveness of audit coupled with feedback, although few audit with feedback interventions have been conducted in long-term care (LTC) settings to date. In general, the effects have been found to be modest at best, although in settings where there has been little history of audit and feedback, the effects may be greater, at least initially. The primary purpose of the Data for Improvement and Clinical Excellence (DICE) Long-Term Care project is to assess the effects of an audit with feedback intervention delivered monthly over 13 months in four LTC facilities. The research questions we addressed are: 1. What effects do feedback reports have on processes and outcomes over time? 2. How do different provider groups in LTC and home care respond to feedback reports based on data targeted at improving quality of care? METHODS/DESIGN: The research team conducting this study comprises researchers and decision makers in continuing care in the province of Alberta, Canada. The intervention consists of monthly feedback reports in nine LTC units in four facilities in Edmonton, Alberta. Data for the feedback reports comes from the Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set (RAI) version 2.0, a standardized instrument mandated for use in LTC facilities throughout Alberta. Feedback reports consist of one page, front and back, presenting both graphic and textual information. Reports are delivered to all staff working in the four LTC facilities. The primary evaluation uses a controlled interrupted time series design both adjusted and unadjusted for covariates. The concurrent process evaluation uses observation and self-report to assess uptake of the feedback reports. Following the project phase described in this protocol, a similar intervention will be conducted in home care settings in Alberta. Depending on project findings, if they are judged useful by decision makers participating in this research team, we plan dissemination and spread of the feedback report approach throughout Alberta.
format Text
id pubmed-2964554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29645542010-10-28 Data for improvement and clinical excellence: protocol for an audit with feedback intervention in long-term care Sales, Anne E Schalm, Corinne Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: There is considerable evidence about the effectiveness of audit coupled with feedback, although few audit with feedback interventions have been conducted in long-term care (LTC) settings to date. In general, the effects have been found to be modest at best, although in settings where there has been little history of audit and feedback, the effects may be greater, at least initially. The primary purpose of the Data for Improvement and Clinical Excellence (DICE) Long-Term Care project is to assess the effects of an audit with feedback intervention delivered monthly over 13 months in four LTC facilities. The research questions we addressed are: 1. What effects do feedback reports have on processes and outcomes over time? 2. How do different provider groups in LTC and home care respond to feedback reports based on data targeted at improving quality of care? METHODS/DESIGN: The research team conducting this study comprises researchers and decision makers in continuing care in the province of Alberta, Canada. The intervention consists of monthly feedback reports in nine LTC units in four facilities in Edmonton, Alberta. Data for the feedback reports comes from the Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set (RAI) version 2.0, a standardized instrument mandated for use in LTC facilities throughout Alberta. Feedback reports consist of one page, front and back, presenting both graphic and textual information. Reports are delivered to all staff working in the four LTC facilities. The primary evaluation uses a controlled interrupted time series design both adjusted and unadjusted for covariates. The concurrent process evaluation uses observation and self-report to assess uptake of the feedback reports. Following the project phase described in this protocol, a similar intervention will be conducted in home care settings in Alberta. Depending on project findings, if they are judged useful by decision makers participating in this research team, we plan dissemination and spread of the feedback report approach throughout Alberta. BioMed Central 2010-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2964554/ /pubmed/20939926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-74 Text en Copyright ©2010 Sales and Schalm; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Sales, Anne E
Schalm, Corinne
Data for improvement and clinical excellence: protocol for an audit with feedback intervention in long-term care
title Data for improvement and clinical excellence: protocol for an audit with feedback intervention in long-term care
title_full Data for improvement and clinical excellence: protocol for an audit with feedback intervention in long-term care
title_fullStr Data for improvement and clinical excellence: protocol for an audit with feedback intervention in long-term care
title_full_unstemmed Data for improvement and clinical excellence: protocol for an audit with feedback intervention in long-term care
title_short Data for improvement and clinical excellence: protocol for an audit with feedback intervention in long-term care
title_sort data for improvement and clinical excellence: protocol for an audit with feedback intervention in long-term care
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20939926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-74
work_keys_str_mv AT salesannee dataforimprovementandclinicalexcellenceprotocolforanauditwithfeedbackinterventioninlongtermcare
AT schalmcorinne dataforimprovementandclinicalexcellenceprotocolforanauditwithfeedbackinterventioninlongtermcare