Cargando…
How do people respond to self-test results? A cross-sectional survey
BACKGROUND: Self-tests, tests on medical conditions that can be performed by consumers without consulting a doctor first, are frequently used. Nevertheless, there are concerns about the safety of self-testing, as it may delay diagnosis and appropriate treatment in the case of inappropriate use of th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20942917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-77 |
_version_ | 1782189393627316224 |
---|---|
author | Ickenroth, Martine HP Ronda, Gaby Grispen, Janaica EJ Dinant, Geert-Jan de Vries, Nanne K van der Weijden, Trudy |
author_facet | Ickenroth, Martine HP Ronda, Gaby Grispen, Janaica EJ Dinant, Geert-Jan de Vries, Nanne K van der Weijden, Trudy |
author_sort | Ickenroth, Martine HP |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Self-tests, tests on medical conditions that can be performed by consumers without consulting a doctor first, are frequently used. Nevertheless, there are concerns about the safety of self-testing, as it may delay diagnosis and appropriate treatment in the case of inappropriate use of the test, or false-negative results. It is unclear whether self-tests stimulate appropriate follow-up behaviour. Our aim was to examine the frequency of self-test use, consumers' response to self-test results in terms of their confidence in the result, reassurance by the test result, and follow-up behaviour. METHODS: A two step cross-sectional survey was designed. A random sample of 6700 Internet users in an existing Internet panel received an online questionnaire on the use of self-tests. Self-tests were defined as tests on body materials, initiated by consumers with the aim to diagnose a disease or risk factor. A second questionnaire on consumers' response to self-test results was sent to the respondents that were identified as a self-tester in the first questionnaire (n = 703). RESULTS: 18.1% (799/4416) of the respondents had ever performed a self-test, the most frequently used tests being those for diabetes (5.3%), kidney disease (4.9%), cholesterol (4.5%), urinary tract infection (1.9%) and HIV/AIDS and Chlamydia (both 1.6%). A total of 78.1% of the testers with a normal test result and 81.4% of those with an abnormal result reported confidence in this result. Almost all (95.6%) of the testers with a normal result felt reassured. After a normal result, 78.1% did not take any further action and 5.8% consulted a doctor. The corresponding figures after an abnormal test result were 9.3% and 72.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents who had performed a self-test seemed to base their follow-up behaviour on the result of the test. They had confidence in the test result, and were often reassured by a normal result. After an abnormal result, most self-testers sought medical care. Because consumers seem to trust the self-test results, further research should focus on the development of consumer information addressing indications for performing a self-test, the validity of self-tests and appropriate interpretation of and management after a test. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2964597 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29645972010-10-28 How do people respond to self-test results? A cross-sectional survey Ickenroth, Martine HP Ronda, Gaby Grispen, Janaica EJ Dinant, Geert-Jan de Vries, Nanne K van der Weijden, Trudy BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Self-tests, tests on medical conditions that can be performed by consumers without consulting a doctor first, are frequently used. Nevertheless, there are concerns about the safety of self-testing, as it may delay diagnosis and appropriate treatment in the case of inappropriate use of the test, or false-negative results. It is unclear whether self-tests stimulate appropriate follow-up behaviour. Our aim was to examine the frequency of self-test use, consumers' response to self-test results in terms of their confidence in the result, reassurance by the test result, and follow-up behaviour. METHODS: A two step cross-sectional survey was designed. A random sample of 6700 Internet users in an existing Internet panel received an online questionnaire on the use of self-tests. Self-tests were defined as tests on body materials, initiated by consumers with the aim to diagnose a disease or risk factor. A second questionnaire on consumers' response to self-test results was sent to the respondents that were identified as a self-tester in the first questionnaire (n = 703). RESULTS: 18.1% (799/4416) of the respondents had ever performed a self-test, the most frequently used tests being those for diabetes (5.3%), kidney disease (4.9%), cholesterol (4.5%), urinary tract infection (1.9%) and HIV/AIDS and Chlamydia (both 1.6%). A total of 78.1% of the testers with a normal test result and 81.4% of those with an abnormal result reported confidence in this result. Almost all (95.6%) of the testers with a normal result felt reassured. After a normal result, 78.1% did not take any further action and 5.8% consulted a doctor. The corresponding figures after an abnormal test result were 9.3% and 72.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents who had performed a self-test seemed to base their follow-up behaviour on the result of the test. They had confidence in the test result, and were often reassured by a normal result. After an abnormal result, most self-testers sought medical care. Because consumers seem to trust the self-test results, further research should focus on the development of consumer information addressing indications for performing a self-test, the validity of self-tests and appropriate interpretation of and management after a test. BioMed Central 2010-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2964597/ /pubmed/20942917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-77 Text en Copyright ©2010 Ickenroth et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ickenroth, Martine HP Ronda, Gaby Grispen, Janaica EJ Dinant, Geert-Jan de Vries, Nanne K van der Weijden, Trudy How do people respond to self-test results? A cross-sectional survey |
title | How do people respond to self-test results? A cross-sectional survey |
title_full | How do people respond to self-test results? A cross-sectional survey |
title_fullStr | How do people respond to self-test results? A cross-sectional survey |
title_full_unstemmed | How do people respond to self-test results? A cross-sectional survey |
title_short | How do people respond to self-test results? A cross-sectional survey |
title_sort | how do people respond to self-test results? a cross-sectional survey |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20942917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-77 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ickenrothmartinehp howdopeoplerespondtoselftestresultsacrosssectionalsurvey AT rondagaby howdopeoplerespondtoselftestresultsacrosssectionalsurvey AT grispenjanaicaej howdopeoplerespondtoselftestresultsacrosssectionalsurvey AT dinantgeertjan howdopeoplerespondtoselftestresultsacrosssectionalsurvey AT devriesnannek howdopeoplerespondtoselftestresultsacrosssectionalsurvey AT vanderweijdentrudy howdopeoplerespondtoselftestresultsacrosssectionalsurvey |