Cargando…

Trust and ambivalence in midwives' views towards women developing pelvic pain during pregnancy: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: The Swedish midwife plays a significant role in the antenatal care (ANC) system, and a majority of pregnant women are satisfied with their ANC. Pelvic pain during pregnancy (PP) is prevalent. The study investigated the views, perceptions and attitudes of midwives currently working in ANC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mogren, Ingrid, Winkvist, Anna, Dahlgren, Lars
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20937158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-600
_version_ 1782189400634949632
author Mogren, Ingrid
Winkvist, Anna
Dahlgren, Lars
author_facet Mogren, Ingrid
Winkvist, Anna
Dahlgren, Lars
author_sort Mogren, Ingrid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Swedish midwife plays a significant role in the antenatal care (ANC) system, and a majority of pregnant women are satisfied with their ANC. Pelvic pain during pregnancy (PP) is prevalent. The study investigated the views, perceptions and attitudes of midwives currently working in ANC regarding PP during pregnancy. METHODS: The informants were ten midwives between the ages of 35 to 64 years, with a combined experience of 250 years of midwifery. In-depth interviews (n = 4) and one focus group discussion (n = 6) were conducted. The data were interpreted using a qualitative content analysis design. RESULTS: PP was considered a common, clinical problem that had most likely increased in prevalence in recent decades and could feature prominently in a woman's experience of pregnancy. The informants had developed a strategy for supporting pregnant women affected by PP. The pregnant woman's fear of not being believed concerning her symptoms and the risk of being regarded as a malingerer were acknowledged. Mistrust between a midwife and a woman might occur when the patient's symptoms were vague and ill defined. PP was not considered as something that complicated delivery, and women experiencing it were advised to await 'the natural course of the pregnancy'. CONCLUSIONS: PP was considered a common, clinical problem and the informants had developed a strategy for supporting pregnant women affected by PP. However, the woman's fear of not being believed concerning her symptoms of PP was acknowledged and mistrust might occur between a midwife and a woman if vague symptoms were reported.
format Text
id pubmed-2964625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29646252010-10-28 Trust and ambivalence in midwives' views towards women developing pelvic pain during pregnancy: a qualitative study Mogren, Ingrid Winkvist, Anna Dahlgren, Lars BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The Swedish midwife plays a significant role in the antenatal care (ANC) system, and a majority of pregnant women are satisfied with their ANC. Pelvic pain during pregnancy (PP) is prevalent. The study investigated the views, perceptions and attitudes of midwives currently working in ANC regarding PP during pregnancy. METHODS: The informants were ten midwives between the ages of 35 to 64 years, with a combined experience of 250 years of midwifery. In-depth interviews (n = 4) and one focus group discussion (n = 6) were conducted. The data were interpreted using a qualitative content analysis design. RESULTS: PP was considered a common, clinical problem that had most likely increased in prevalence in recent decades and could feature prominently in a woman's experience of pregnancy. The informants had developed a strategy for supporting pregnant women affected by PP. The pregnant woman's fear of not being believed concerning her symptoms and the risk of being regarded as a malingerer were acknowledged. Mistrust between a midwife and a woman might occur when the patient's symptoms were vague and ill defined. PP was not considered as something that complicated delivery, and women experiencing it were advised to await 'the natural course of the pregnancy'. CONCLUSIONS: PP was considered a common, clinical problem and the informants had developed a strategy for supporting pregnant women affected by PP. However, the woman's fear of not being believed concerning her symptoms of PP was acknowledged and mistrust might occur between a midwife and a woman if vague symptoms were reported. BioMed Central 2010-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2964625/ /pubmed/20937158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-600 Text en Copyright ©2010 Mogren et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mogren, Ingrid
Winkvist, Anna
Dahlgren, Lars
Trust and ambivalence in midwives' views towards women developing pelvic pain during pregnancy: a qualitative study
title Trust and ambivalence in midwives' views towards women developing pelvic pain during pregnancy: a qualitative study
title_full Trust and ambivalence in midwives' views towards women developing pelvic pain during pregnancy: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Trust and ambivalence in midwives' views towards women developing pelvic pain during pregnancy: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Trust and ambivalence in midwives' views towards women developing pelvic pain during pregnancy: a qualitative study
title_short Trust and ambivalence in midwives' views towards women developing pelvic pain during pregnancy: a qualitative study
title_sort trust and ambivalence in midwives' views towards women developing pelvic pain during pregnancy: a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20937158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-600
work_keys_str_mv AT mogreningrid trustandambivalenceinmidwivesviewstowardswomendevelopingpelvicpainduringpregnancyaqualitativestudy
AT winkvistanna trustandambivalenceinmidwivesviewstowardswomendevelopingpelvicpainduringpregnancyaqualitativestudy
AT dahlgrenlars trustandambivalenceinmidwivesviewstowardswomendevelopingpelvicpainduringpregnancyaqualitativestudy