Cargando…
Trust and ambivalence in midwives' views towards women developing pelvic pain during pregnancy: a qualitative study
BACKGROUND: The Swedish midwife plays a significant role in the antenatal care (ANC) system, and a majority of pregnant women are satisfied with their ANC. Pelvic pain during pregnancy (PP) is prevalent. The study investigated the views, perceptions and attitudes of midwives currently working in ANC...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20937158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-600 |
_version_ | 1782189400634949632 |
---|---|
author | Mogren, Ingrid Winkvist, Anna Dahlgren, Lars |
author_facet | Mogren, Ingrid Winkvist, Anna Dahlgren, Lars |
author_sort | Mogren, Ingrid |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Swedish midwife plays a significant role in the antenatal care (ANC) system, and a majority of pregnant women are satisfied with their ANC. Pelvic pain during pregnancy (PP) is prevalent. The study investigated the views, perceptions and attitudes of midwives currently working in ANC regarding PP during pregnancy. METHODS: The informants were ten midwives between the ages of 35 to 64 years, with a combined experience of 250 years of midwifery. In-depth interviews (n = 4) and one focus group discussion (n = 6) were conducted. The data were interpreted using a qualitative content analysis design. RESULTS: PP was considered a common, clinical problem that had most likely increased in prevalence in recent decades and could feature prominently in a woman's experience of pregnancy. The informants had developed a strategy for supporting pregnant women affected by PP. The pregnant woman's fear of not being believed concerning her symptoms and the risk of being regarded as a malingerer were acknowledged. Mistrust between a midwife and a woman might occur when the patient's symptoms were vague and ill defined. PP was not considered as something that complicated delivery, and women experiencing it were advised to await 'the natural course of the pregnancy'. CONCLUSIONS: PP was considered a common, clinical problem and the informants had developed a strategy for supporting pregnant women affected by PP. However, the woman's fear of not being believed concerning her symptoms of PP was acknowledged and mistrust might occur between a midwife and a woman if vague symptoms were reported. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2964625 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29646252010-10-28 Trust and ambivalence in midwives' views towards women developing pelvic pain during pregnancy: a qualitative study Mogren, Ingrid Winkvist, Anna Dahlgren, Lars BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The Swedish midwife plays a significant role in the antenatal care (ANC) system, and a majority of pregnant women are satisfied with their ANC. Pelvic pain during pregnancy (PP) is prevalent. The study investigated the views, perceptions and attitudes of midwives currently working in ANC regarding PP during pregnancy. METHODS: The informants were ten midwives between the ages of 35 to 64 years, with a combined experience of 250 years of midwifery. In-depth interviews (n = 4) and one focus group discussion (n = 6) were conducted. The data were interpreted using a qualitative content analysis design. RESULTS: PP was considered a common, clinical problem that had most likely increased in prevalence in recent decades and could feature prominently in a woman's experience of pregnancy. The informants had developed a strategy for supporting pregnant women affected by PP. The pregnant woman's fear of not being believed concerning her symptoms and the risk of being regarded as a malingerer were acknowledged. Mistrust between a midwife and a woman might occur when the patient's symptoms were vague and ill defined. PP was not considered as something that complicated delivery, and women experiencing it were advised to await 'the natural course of the pregnancy'. CONCLUSIONS: PP was considered a common, clinical problem and the informants had developed a strategy for supporting pregnant women affected by PP. However, the woman's fear of not being believed concerning her symptoms of PP was acknowledged and mistrust might occur between a midwife and a woman if vague symptoms were reported. BioMed Central 2010-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2964625/ /pubmed/20937158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-600 Text en Copyright ©2010 Mogren et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mogren, Ingrid Winkvist, Anna Dahlgren, Lars Trust and ambivalence in midwives' views towards women developing pelvic pain during pregnancy: a qualitative study |
title | Trust and ambivalence in midwives' views towards women developing pelvic pain during pregnancy: a qualitative study |
title_full | Trust and ambivalence in midwives' views towards women developing pelvic pain during pregnancy: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Trust and ambivalence in midwives' views towards women developing pelvic pain during pregnancy: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Trust and ambivalence in midwives' views towards women developing pelvic pain during pregnancy: a qualitative study |
title_short | Trust and ambivalence in midwives' views towards women developing pelvic pain during pregnancy: a qualitative study |
title_sort | trust and ambivalence in midwives' views towards women developing pelvic pain during pregnancy: a qualitative study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20937158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-600 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mogreningrid trustandambivalenceinmidwivesviewstowardswomendevelopingpelvicpainduringpregnancyaqualitativestudy AT winkvistanna trustandambivalenceinmidwivesviewstowardswomendevelopingpelvicpainduringpregnancyaqualitativestudy AT dahlgrenlars trustandambivalenceinmidwivesviewstowardswomendevelopingpelvicpainduringpregnancyaqualitativestudy |