Cargando…

Protective effect of rifampicin and clindamycin impregnated devices against Staphylococcus spp. infection after cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedures

BACKGROUND: Infection is a major complication of cerebrospinal fluid shunting procedures. The present report assesses the efficacy of such catheters in both shunts and external ventricular drains (EVDs) against infection and particularly against Staphylococcus spp. infection. METHODS: All shunt and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gutiérrez-González, Raquel, Boto, Gregorio R, Fernández-Pérez, Cristina, del Prado, Náyade
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20939914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-10-93
_version_ 1782189405928161280
author Gutiérrez-González, Raquel
Boto, Gregorio R
Fernández-Pérez, Cristina
del Prado, Náyade
author_facet Gutiérrez-González, Raquel
Boto, Gregorio R
Fernández-Pérez, Cristina
del Prado, Náyade
author_sort Gutiérrez-González, Raquel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Infection is a major complication of cerebrospinal fluid shunting procedures. The present report assesses the efficacy of such catheters in both shunts and external ventricular drains (EVDs) against infection and particularly against Staphylococcus spp. infection. METHODS: All shunt and EVD procedures performed by means of antibiotic-impregnated catheters (AICs) and non-AICs during the period of study were registered. In cases of shunt procedures, a minimal follow-up of 90 days was considered, as well as de novo insertion and catheter revisions. Single valve revisions were not included. In cases of EVD procedures, those catheters removed before the fifth post-insertion day were not included. A total of 119 cerebrospinal fluid shunting procedures performed with AICs were studied in comparison with 112 procedures performed by means of non-AICs. RESULTS: Antibiotic-impregnated catheters were associated with a significant decrease in both overall and staphylococcal infection (p = 0.030 and p = 0.045, respectively). The number needed to treat for AICs was 8 to prevent one infection and 14 to prevent one staphylococcal infection. When comparing with shunts, the use of EVDs was associated with a 37-fold increased likelihood of infection. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic-impregnated catheters are a safe and helpful tool to reduce CSF shunting device-related infections.
format Text
id pubmed-2964650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29646502010-10-28 Protective effect of rifampicin and clindamycin impregnated devices against Staphylococcus spp. infection after cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedures Gutiérrez-González, Raquel Boto, Gregorio R Fernández-Pérez, Cristina del Prado, Náyade BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: Infection is a major complication of cerebrospinal fluid shunting procedures. The present report assesses the efficacy of such catheters in both shunts and external ventricular drains (EVDs) against infection and particularly against Staphylococcus spp. infection. METHODS: All shunt and EVD procedures performed by means of antibiotic-impregnated catheters (AICs) and non-AICs during the period of study were registered. In cases of shunt procedures, a minimal follow-up of 90 days was considered, as well as de novo insertion and catheter revisions. Single valve revisions were not included. In cases of EVD procedures, those catheters removed before the fifth post-insertion day were not included. A total of 119 cerebrospinal fluid shunting procedures performed with AICs were studied in comparison with 112 procedures performed by means of non-AICs. RESULTS: Antibiotic-impregnated catheters were associated with a significant decrease in both overall and staphylococcal infection (p = 0.030 and p = 0.045, respectively). The number needed to treat for AICs was 8 to prevent one infection and 14 to prevent one staphylococcal infection. When comparing with shunts, the use of EVDs was associated with a 37-fold increased likelihood of infection. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic-impregnated catheters are a safe and helpful tool to reduce CSF shunting device-related infections. BioMed Central 2010-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2964650/ /pubmed/20939914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-10-93 Text en Copyright ©2010 Gutiérrez-González et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gutiérrez-González, Raquel
Boto, Gregorio R
Fernández-Pérez, Cristina
del Prado, Náyade
Protective effect of rifampicin and clindamycin impregnated devices against Staphylococcus spp. infection after cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedures
title Protective effect of rifampicin and clindamycin impregnated devices against Staphylococcus spp. infection after cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedures
title_full Protective effect of rifampicin and clindamycin impregnated devices against Staphylococcus spp. infection after cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedures
title_fullStr Protective effect of rifampicin and clindamycin impregnated devices against Staphylococcus spp. infection after cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedures
title_full_unstemmed Protective effect of rifampicin and clindamycin impregnated devices against Staphylococcus spp. infection after cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedures
title_short Protective effect of rifampicin and clindamycin impregnated devices against Staphylococcus spp. infection after cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedures
title_sort protective effect of rifampicin and clindamycin impregnated devices against staphylococcus spp. infection after cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20939914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-10-93
work_keys_str_mv AT gutierrezgonzalezraquel protectiveeffectofrifampicinandclindamycinimpregnateddevicesagainststaphylococcussppinfectionaftercerebrospinalfluiddiversionprocedures
AT botogregorior protectiveeffectofrifampicinandclindamycinimpregnateddevicesagainststaphylococcussppinfectionaftercerebrospinalfluiddiversionprocedures
AT fernandezperezcristina protectiveeffectofrifampicinandclindamycinimpregnateddevicesagainststaphylococcussppinfectionaftercerebrospinalfluiddiversionprocedures
AT delpradonayade protectiveeffectofrifampicinandclindamycinimpregnateddevicesagainststaphylococcussppinfectionaftercerebrospinalfluiddiversionprocedures