Cargando…

Towards real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance-guided transarterial aortic valve implantation: In vitro evaluation and modification of existing devices

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is considered an attractive alternative for guiding transarterial aortic valve implantation (TAVI) featuring unlimited scan plane orientation and unsurpassed soft-tissue contrast with simultaneous device visualization. We sought to evaluate the CMR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kahlert, Philipp, Eggebrecht, Holger, Plicht, Björn, Kraff, Oliver, McDougall, Ian, Decker, Brad, Erbel, Raimund, Ladd, Mark E, Quick, Harald H
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20942968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-58
_version_ 1782189415382122496
author Kahlert, Philipp
Eggebrecht, Holger
Plicht, Björn
Kraff, Oliver
McDougall, Ian
Decker, Brad
Erbel, Raimund
Ladd, Mark E
Quick, Harald H
author_facet Kahlert, Philipp
Eggebrecht, Holger
Plicht, Björn
Kraff, Oliver
McDougall, Ian
Decker, Brad
Erbel, Raimund
Ladd, Mark E
Quick, Harald H
author_sort Kahlert, Philipp
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is considered an attractive alternative for guiding transarterial aortic valve implantation (TAVI) featuring unlimited scan plane orientation and unsurpassed soft-tissue contrast with simultaneous device visualization. We sought to evaluate the CMR characteristics of both currently commercially available transcatheter heart valves (Edwards SAPIEN™, Medtronic CoreValve(®)) including their dedicated delivery devices and of a custom-built, CMR-compatible delivery device for the Medtronic CoreValve(® )prosthesis as an initial step towards real-time CMR-guided TAVI. METHODS: The devices were systematically examined in phantom models on a 1.5-Tesla scanner using high-resolution T(1)-weighted 3D FLASH, real-time TrueFISP and flow-sensitive phase-contrast sequences. Images were analyzed for device visualization quality, device-related susceptibility artifacts, and radiofrequency signal shielding. RESULTS: CMR revealed major susceptibility artifacts for the two commercial delivery devices caused by considerable metal braiding and precluding in vivo application. The stainless steel-based Edwards SAPIEN™ prosthesis was also regarded not suitable for CMR-guided TAVI due to susceptibility artifacts exceeding the valve's dimensions and hindering an exact placement. In contrast, the nitinol-based Medtronic CoreValve(® )prosthesis was excellently visualized with delineation even of small details and, thus, regarded suitable for CMR-guided TAVI, particularly since reengineering of its delivery device toward CMR-compatibility resulted in artifact elimination and excellent visualization during catheter movement and valve deployment on real-time TrueFISP imaging. Reliable flow measurements could be performed for both stent-valves after deployment using phase-contrast sequences. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that the Medtronic CoreValve(® )prosthesis is potentially suited for real-time CMR-guided placement in vivo after suggested design modifications of the delivery system.
format Text
id pubmed-2964701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29647012010-10-28 Towards real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance-guided transarterial aortic valve implantation: In vitro evaluation and modification of existing devices Kahlert, Philipp Eggebrecht, Holger Plicht, Björn Kraff, Oliver McDougall, Ian Decker, Brad Erbel, Raimund Ladd, Mark E Quick, Harald H J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is considered an attractive alternative for guiding transarterial aortic valve implantation (TAVI) featuring unlimited scan plane orientation and unsurpassed soft-tissue contrast with simultaneous device visualization. We sought to evaluate the CMR characteristics of both currently commercially available transcatheter heart valves (Edwards SAPIEN™, Medtronic CoreValve(®)) including their dedicated delivery devices and of a custom-built, CMR-compatible delivery device for the Medtronic CoreValve(® )prosthesis as an initial step towards real-time CMR-guided TAVI. METHODS: The devices were systematically examined in phantom models on a 1.5-Tesla scanner using high-resolution T(1)-weighted 3D FLASH, real-time TrueFISP and flow-sensitive phase-contrast sequences. Images were analyzed for device visualization quality, device-related susceptibility artifacts, and radiofrequency signal shielding. RESULTS: CMR revealed major susceptibility artifacts for the two commercial delivery devices caused by considerable metal braiding and precluding in vivo application. The stainless steel-based Edwards SAPIEN™ prosthesis was also regarded not suitable for CMR-guided TAVI due to susceptibility artifacts exceeding the valve's dimensions and hindering an exact placement. In contrast, the nitinol-based Medtronic CoreValve(® )prosthesis was excellently visualized with delineation even of small details and, thus, regarded suitable for CMR-guided TAVI, particularly since reengineering of its delivery device toward CMR-compatibility resulted in artifact elimination and excellent visualization during catheter movement and valve deployment on real-time TrueFISP imaging. Reliable flow measurements could be performed for both stent-valves after deployment using phase-contrast sequences. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that the Medtronic CoreValve(® )prosthesis is potentially suited for real-time CMR-guided placement in vivo after suggested design modifications of the delivery system. BioMed Central 2010-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2964701/ /pubmed/20942968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-58 Text en Copyright ©2010 Kahlert et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kahlert, Philipp
Eggebrecht, Holger
Plicht, Björn
Kraff, Oliver
McDougall, Ian
Decker, Brad
Erbel, Raimund
Ladd, Mark E
Quick, Harald H
Towards real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance-guided transarterial aortic valve implantation: In vitro evaluation and modification of existing devices
title Towards real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance-guided transarterial aortic valve implantation: In vitro evaluation and modification of existing devices
title_full Towards real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance-guided transarterial aortic valve implantation: In vitro evaluation and modification of existing devices
title_fullStr Towards real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance-guided transarterial aortic valve implantation: In vitro evaluation and modification of existing devices
title_full_unstemmed Towards real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance-guided transarterial aortic valve implantation: In vitro evaluation and modification of existing devices
title_short Towards real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance-guided transarterial aortic valve implantation: In vitro evaluation and modification of existing devices
title_sort towards real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance-guided transarterial aortic valve implantation: in vitro evaluation and modification of existing devices
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20942968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-58
work_keys_str_mv AT kahlertphilipp towardsrealtimecardiovascularmagneticresonanceguidedtransarterialaorticvalveimplantationinvitroevaluationandmodificationofexistingdevices
AT eggebrechtholger towardsrealtimecardiovascularmagneticresonanceguidedtransarterialaorticvalveimplantationinvitroevaluationandmodificationofexistingdevices
AT plichtbjorn towardsrealtimecardiovascularmagneticresonanceguidedtransarterialaorticvalveimplantationinvitroevaluationandmodificationofexistingdevices
AT kraffoliver towardsrealtimecardiovascularmagneticresonanceguidedtransarterialaorticvalveimplantationinvitroevaluationandmodificationofexistingdevices
AT mcdougallian towardsrealtimecardiovascularmagneticresonanceguidedtransarterialaorticvalveimplantationinvitroevaluationandmodificationofexistingdevices
AT deckerbrad towardsrealtimecardiovascularmagneticresonanceguidedtransarterialaorticvalveimplantationinvitroevaluationandmodificationofexistingdevices
AT erbelraimund towardsrealtimecardiovascularmagneticresonanceguidedtransarterialaorticvalveimplantationinvitroevaluationandmodificationofexistingdevices
AT laddmarke towardsrealtimecardiovascularmagneticresonanceguidedtransarterialaorticvalveimplantationinvitroevaluationandmodificationofexistingdevices
AT quickharaldh towardsrealtimecardiovascularmagneticresonanceguidedtransarterialaorticvalveimplantationinvitroevaluationandmodificationofexistingdevices