Cargando…

Small coronary vessel angioplasty: outcomes and technical considerations

Small vessel (<3 mm) coronary artery disease is common and has been identified as independent predictor of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. It remains controversial whether bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation in small vessels has an advantage over balloon angioplasty in terms...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Rathore, Sudhir
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21057576
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S8161
_version_ 1782189455220670464
author Rathore, Sudhir
author_facet Rathore, Sudhir
author_sort Rathore, Sudhir
collection PubMed
description Small vessel (<3 mm) coronary artery disease is common and has been identified as independent predictor of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. It remains controversial whether bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation in small vessels has an advantage over balloon angioplasty in terms of angiographic and clinical outcomes. Introduction of drug-eluting stent (DES) has resulted in significant reduction in restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization. Several DESs have been introduced resulting in varying reduction in outcomes as compared with BMS. However, their impact on outcomes in small vessels is not clearly known. It is expected that DES could substantially reduce restenosis in smaller vessels. Large, randomized studies are warranted to assess the impact of different DESs on outcomes in patients with small coronary arteries.
format Text
id pubmed-2964944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29649442010-11-05 Small coronary vessel angioplasty: outcomes and technical considerations Rathore, Sudhir Vasc Health Risk Manag Review Small vessel (<3 mm) coronary artery disease is common and has been identified as independent predictor of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. It remains controversial whether bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation in small vessels has an advantage over balloon angioplasty in terms of angiographic and clinical outcomes. Introduction of drug-eluting stent (DES) has resulted in significant reduction in restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization. Several DESs have been introduced resulting in varying reduction in outcomes as compared with BMS. However, their impact on outcomes in small vessels is not clearly known. It is expected that DES could substantially reduce restenosis in smaller vessels. Large, randomized studies are warranted to assess the impact of different DESs on outcomes in patients with small coronary arteries. Dove Medical Press 2010-10-21 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2964944/ /pubmed/21057576 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S8161 Text en © 2010 Rathore, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Rathore, Sudhir
Small coronary vessel angioplasty: outcomes and technical considerations
title Small coronary vessel angioplasty: outcomes and technical considerations
title_full Small coronary vessel angioplasty: outcomes and technical considerations
title_fullStr Small coronary vessel angioplasty: outcomes and technical considerations
title_full_unstemmed Small coronary vessel angioplasty: outcomes and technical considerations
title_short Small coronary vessel angioplasty: outcomes and technical considerations
title_sort small coronary vessel angioplasty: outcomes and technical considerations
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21057576
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S8161
work_keys_str_mv AT rathoresudhir smallcoronaryvesselangioplastyoutcomesandtechnicalconsiderations