Cargando…

MRSA and cataract surgery – reflections for practice

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis is a devastating complication of cataract surgery. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) endophthalmitis is rare. Recent debate over MRSA screening in United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) hospital services has implicatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Porter, LF, Khan, RU, Hannan, A, Kelly, SP
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21060676
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S12027
_version_ 1782189459707527168
author Porter, LF
Khan, RU
Hannan, A
Kelly, SP
author_facet Porter, LF
Khan, RU
Hannan, A
Kelly, SP
author_sort Porter, LF
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis is a devastating complication of cataract surgery. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) endophthalmitis is rare. Recent debate over MRSA screening in United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) hospital services has implications for cataract patients and ophthalmology services. AIMS: To discuss issues for clinical practice as based on reflective experience at a UK district general NHS hospital in relation to care of MRSA-positive cataract patients. METHODS: Retrospective case series and reflective practice. RESULTS: Three cases presented highlight practice points around cataract patients colonized with MRSA. Known or determined MRSA-colonized patients should be treated with anti-microbial agents at time of cataract surgery known to be active against MRSA. Preventative treatment with intracameral vancomycin or intravenous teicoplanin alongside appropriate topical treatments may be of merit. Importantly fluoroquinolones, often prescribed by cataract surgeons, may have a selective effect favoring the proliferation of MRSA. CONCLUSION: MRSA screening may cause unnecessary delays in cataract care and may represent a patient safety concern in its own right. Patients colonized with MRSA may safely undergo cataract surgery provided there is no evidence of periorbital infection and provided appropriate infection control and antibiotic prophylaxis measures are used. The well-prepared cataract surgeon needs to be aware of developments in infection control and should liaise with local clinical microbiology colleagues in relation to bacterial resistance to antibiotics.
format Text
id pubmed-2964962
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29649622010-11-08 MRSA and cataract surgery – reflections for practice Porter, LF Khan, RU Hannan, A Kelly, SP Clin Ophthalmol Review INTRODUCTION: Postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis is a devastating complication of cataract surgery. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) endophthalmitis is rare. Recent debate over MRSA screening in United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) hospital services has implications for cataract patients and ophthalmology services. AIMS: To discuss issues for clinical practice as based on reflective experience at a UK district general NHS hospital in relation to care of MRSA-positive cataract patients. METHODS: Retrospective case series and reflective practice. RESULTS: Three cases presented highlight practice points around cataract patients colonized with MRSA. Known or determined MRSA-colonized patients should be treated with anti-microbial agents at time of cataract surgery known to be active against MRSA. Preventative treatment with intracameral vancomycin or intravenous teicoplanin alongside appropriate topical treatments may be of merit. Importantly fluoroquinolones, often prescribed by cataract surgeons, may have a selective effect favoring the proliferation of MRSA. CONCLUSION: MRSA screening may cause unnecessary delays in cataract care and may represent a patient safety concern in its own right. Patients colonized with MRSA may safely undergo cataract surgery provided there is no evidence of periorbital infection and provided appropriate infection control and antibiotic prophylaxis measures are used. The well-prepared cataract surgeon needs to be aware of developments in infection control and should liaise with local clinical microbiology colleagues in relation to bacterial resistance to antibiotics. Dove Medical Press 2010-10-21 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2964962/ /pubmed/21060676 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S12027 Text en © 2010 Porter et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Porter, LF
Khan, RU
Hannan, A
Kelly, SP
MRSA and cataract surgery – reflections for practice
title MRSA and cataract surgery – reflections for practice
title_full MRSA and cataract surgery – reflections for practice
title_fullStr MRSA and cataract surgery – reflections for practice
title_full_unstemmed MRSA and cataract surgery – reflections for practice
title_short MRSA and cataract surgery – reflections for practice
title_sort mrsa and cataract surgery – reflections for practice
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21060676
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S12027
work_keys_str_mv AT porterlf mrsaandcataractsurgeryreflectionsforpractice
AT khanru mrsaandcataractsurgeryreflectionsforpractice
AT hannana mrsaandcataractsurgeryreflectionsforpractice
AT kellysp mrsaandcataractsurgeryreflectionsforpractice