Cargando…
MRSA and cataract surgery – reflections for practice
INTRODUCTION: Postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis is a devastating complication of cataract surgery. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) endophthalmitis is rare. Recent debate over MRSA screening in United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) hospital services has implicatio...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21060676 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S12027 |
_version_ | 1782189459707527168 |
---|---|
author | Porter, LF Khan, RU Hannan, A Kelly, SP |
author_facet | Porter, LF Khan, RU Hannan, A Kelly, SP |
author_sort | Porter, LF |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis is a devastating complication of cataract surgery. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) endophthalmitis is rare. Recent debate over MRSA screening in United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) hospital services has implications for cataract patients and ophthalmology services. AIMS: To discuss issues for clinical practice as based on reflective experience at a UK district general NHS hospital in relation to care of MRSA-positive cataract patients. METHODS: Retrospective case series and reflective practice. RESULTS: Three cases presented highlight practice points around cataract patients colonized with MRSA. Known or determined MRSA-colonized patients should be treated with anti-microbial agents at time of cataract surgery known to be active against MRSA. Preventative treatment with intracameral vancomycin or intravenous teicoplanin alongside appropriate topical treatments may be of merit. Importantly fluoroquinolones, often prescribed by cataract surgeons, may have a selective effect favoring the proliferation of MRSA. CONCLUSION: MRSA screening may cause unnecessary delays in cataract care and may represent a patient safety concern in its own right. Patients colonized with MRSA may safely undergo cataract surgery provided there is no evidence of periorbital infection and provided appropriate infection control and antibiotic prophylaxis measures are used. The well-prepared cataract surgeon needs to be aware of developments in infection control and should liaise with local clinical microbiology colleagues in relation to bacterial resistance to antibiotics. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2964962 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29649622010-11-08 MRSA and cataract surgery – reflections for practice Porter, LF Khan, RU Hannan, A Kelly, SP Clin Ophthalmol Review INTRODUCTION: Postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis is a devastating complication of cataract surgery. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) endophthalmitis is rare. Recent debate over MRSA screening in United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) hospital services has implications for cataract patients and ophthalmology services. AIMS: To discuss issues for clinical practice as based on reflective experience at a UK district general NHS hospital in relation to care of MRSA-positive cataract patients. METHODS: Retrospective case series and reflective practice. RESULTS: Three cases presented highlight practice points around cataract patients colonized with MRSA. Known or determined MRSA-colonized patients should be treated with anti-microbial agents at time of cataract surgery known to be active against MRSA. Preventative treatment with intracameral vancomycin or intravenous teicoplanin alongside appropriate topical treatments may be of merit. Importantly fluoroquinolones, often prescribed by cataract surgeons, may have a selective effect favoring the proliferation of MRSA. CONCLUSION: MRSA screening may cause unnecessary delays in cataract care and may represent a patient safety concern in its own right. Patients colonized with MRSA may safely undergo cataract surgery provided there is no evidence of periorbital infection and provided appropriate infection control and antibiotic prophylaxis measures are used. The well-prepared cataract surgeon needs to be aware of developments in infection control and should liaise with local clinical microbiology colleagues in relation to bacterial resistance to antibiotics. Dove Medical Press 2010-10-21 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2964962/ /pubmed/21060676 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S12027 Text en © 2010 Porter et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Porter, LF Khan, RU Hannan, A Kelly, SP MRSA and cataract surgery – reflections for practice |
title | MRSA and cataract surgery – reflections for practice |
title_full | MRSA and cataract surgery – reflections for practice |
title_fullStr | MRSA and cataract surgery – reflections for practice |
title_full_unstemmed | MRSA and cataract surgery – reflections for practice |
title_short | MRSA and cataract surgery – reflections for practice |
title_sort | mrsa and cataract surgery – reflections for practice |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21060676 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S12027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT porterlf mrsaandcataractsurgeryreflectionsforpractice AT khanru mrsaandcataractsurgeryreflectionsforpractice AT hannana mrsaandcataractsurgeryreflectionsforpractice AT kellysp mrsaandcataractsurgeryreflectionsforpractice |