Cargando…
THE COMPARISON BETWEEN THE EFFICACY OF HIGH DOSE ACYCLOVIR AND ERYTHROMYCIN ON THE PERIOD AND SIGNS OF PITIRIASIS ROSEA
BACKGROUND: Pityriasis Rosea (PR) is an acute inflammatory and self-limiting skin disorder, sometimes with troublesome symptoms. To date, there are few treatments available for this disorder. AIM: Compare the traditional treatment with erythromycin to a newly introduced antiviral treatment acyclovir...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2965909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21063515 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.70672 |
_version_ | 1782189557151694848 |
---|---|
author | Ehsani, Amirhooshang Esmaily, Nafiseh Noormohammadpour, Pedram Toosi, Siavash Hosseinpour, Alireza Hosseini, Mahbobeh Sayanjali, Shima |
author_facet | Ehsani, Amirhooshang Esmaily, Nafiseh Noormohammadpour, Pedram Toosi, Siavash Hosseinpour, Alireza Hosseini, Mahbobeh Sayanjali, Shima |
author_sort | Ehsani, Amirhooshang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pityriasis Rosea (PR) is an acute inflammatory and self-limiting skin disorder, sometimes with troublesome symptoms. To date, there are few treatments available for this disorder. AIM: Compare the traditional treatment with erythromycin to a newly introduced antiviral treatment acyclovir for PR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with clinically confirmed diagnosis of PR, matching our exclusion criteria, were enrolled. They were randomized in two groups that received high-dose oral acyclovir or erythromycin. The participants were evaluated two, four, and eight weeks after commencement of the study and followed for one year. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients including 15 males and 15 females completed the study. After eight weeks, 13 patients in the acyclovir group experienced complete response, while in the erythromycin group only six patients had complete response (P < 0.05). Also, patients in the acyclovir group experienced faster resolution of pruritus in comparison with the erythromycin group (not significant). No adverse drug reaction was detected in both groups. CONCLUSION: It seemed that a high-dose of oral acyclovir was a safe and effective therapy for PR, although this remained to be confirmed in larger studies. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2965909 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29659092010-11-09 THE COMPARISON BETWEEN THE EFFICACY OF HIGH DOSE ACYCLOVIR AND ERYTHROMYCIN ON THE PERIOD AND SIGNS OF PITIRIASIS ROSEA Ehsani, Amirhooshang Esmaily, Nafiseh Noormohammadpour, Pedram Toosi, Siavash Hosseinpour, Alireza Hosseini, Mahbobeh Sayanjali, Shima Indian J Dermatol Therapeutic Round BACKGROUND: Pityriasis Rosea (PR) is an acute inflammatory and self-limiting skin disorder, sometimes with troublesome symptoms. To date, there are few treatments available for this disorder. AIM: Compare the traditional treatment with erythromycin to a newly introduced antiviral treatment acyclovir for PR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with clinically confirmed diagnosis of PR, matching our exclusion criteria, were enrolled. They were randomized in two groups that received high-dose oral acyclovir or erythromycin. The participants were evaluated two, four, and eight weeks after commencement of the study and followed for one year. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients including 15 males and 15 females completed the study. After eight weeks, 13 patients in the acyclovir group experienced complete response, while in the erythromycin group only six patients had complete response (P < 0.05). Also, patients in the acyclovir group experienced faster resolution of pruritus in comparison with the erythromycin group (not significant). No adverse drug reaction was detected in both groups. CONCLUSION: It seemed that a high-dose of oral acyclovir was a safe and effective therapy for PR, although this remained to be confirmed in larger studies. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2965909/ /pubmed/21063515 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.70672 Text en © Indian Journal of Dermatology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Therapeutic Round Ehsani, Amirhooshang Esmaily, Nafiseh Noormohammadpour, Pedram Toosi, Siavash Hosseinpour, Alireza Hosseini, Mahbobeh Sayanjali, Shima THE COMPARISON BETWEEN THE EFFICACY OF HIGH DOSE ACYCLOVIR AND ERYTHROMYCIN ON THE PERIOD AND SIGNS OF PITIRIASIS ROSEA |
title | THE COMPARISON BETWEEN THE EFFICACY OF HIGH DOSE ACYCLOVIR AND ERYTHROMYCIN ON THE PERIOD AND SIGNS OF PITIRIASIS ROSEA |
title_full | THE COMPARISON BETWEEN THE EFFICACY OF HIGH DOSE ACYCLOVIR AND ERYTHROMYCIN ON THE PERIOD AND SIGNS OF PITIRIASIS ROSEA |
title_fullStr | THE COMPARISON BETWEEN THE EFFICACY OF HIGH DOSE ACYCLOVIR AND ERYTHROMYCIN ON THE PERIOD AND SIGNS OF PITIRIASIS ROSEA |
title_full_unstemmed | THE COMPARISON BETWEEN THE EFFICACY OF HIGH DOSE ACYCLOVIR AND ERYTHROMYCIN ON THE PERIOD AND SIGNS OF PITIRIASIS ROSEA |
title_short | THE COMPARISON BETWEEN THE EFFICACY OF HIGH DOSE ACYCLOVIR AND ERYTHROMYCIN ON THE PERIOD AND SIGNS OF PITIRIASIS ROSEA |
title_sort | comparison between the efficacy of high dose acyclovir and erythromycin on the period and signs of pitiriasis rosea |
topic | Therapeutic Round |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2965909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21063515 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.70672 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ehsaniamirhooshang thecomparisonbetweentheefficacyofhighdoseacycloviranderythromycinontheperiodandsignsofpitiriasisrosea AT esmailynafiseh thecomparisonbetweentheefficacyofhighdoseacycloviranderythromycinontheperiodandsignsofpitiriasisrosea AT noormohammadpourpedram thecomparisonbetweentheefficacyofhighdoseacycloviranderythromycinontheperiodandsignsofpitiriasisrosea AT toosisiavash thecomparisonbetweentheefficacyofhighdoseacycloviranderythromycinontheperiodandsignsofpitiriasisrosea AT hosseinpouralireza thecomparisonbetweentheefficacyofhighdoseacycloviranderythromycinontheperiodandsignsofpitiriasisrosea AT hosseinimahbobeh thecomparisonbetweentheefficacyofhighdoseacycloviranderythromycinontheperiodandsignsofpitiriasisrosea AT sayanjalishima thecomparisonbetweentheefficacyofhighdoseacycloviranderythromycinontheperiodandsignsofpitiriasisrosea AT ehsaniamirhooshang comparisonbetweentheefficacyofhighdoseacycloviranderythromycinontheperiodandsignsofpitiriasisrosea AT esmailynafiseh comparisonbetweentheefficacyofhighdoseacycloviranderythromycinontheperiodandsignsofpitiriasisrosea AT noormohammadpourpedram comparisonbetweentheefficacyofhighdoseacycloviranderythromycinontheperiodandsignsofpitiriasisrosea AT toosisiavash comparisonbetweentheefficacyofhighdoseacycloviranderythromycinontheperiodandsignsofpitiriasisrosea AT hosseinpouralireza comparisonbetweentheefficacyofhighdoseacycloviranderythromycinontheperiodandsignsofpitiriasisrosea AT hosseinimahbobeh comparisonbetweentheefficacyofhighdoseacycloviranderythromycinontheperiodandsignsofpitiriasisrosea AT sayanjalishima comparisonbetweentheefficacyofhighdoseacycloviranderythromycinontheperiodandsignsofpitiriasisrosea |