Cargando…
Prevention of pain with the injection of microemulsion propofol: a comparison of a combination of lidocaine and ketamine with lidocaine or ketamine alone
BACKGROUND: Aquafol, a microemulsion propofol, causes more severe and frequent pain on injection than propofol. The purpose of this study was to compare a combination of lidocaine and ketamine on aquafol-induced pain with lidocaine or ketamine alone during the induction of anesthesia. METHODS: In th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2966702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21057611 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2010.59.4.233 |
_version_ | 1782189614853783552 |
---|---|
author | Hwang, Insung Noh, Jung Il Kim, Soon Im Kim, Mun-Gyu Park, Sun-Young Kim, Sang Ho Ok, Si Young |
author_facet | Hwang, Insung Noh, Jung Il Kim, Soon Im Kim, Mun-Gyu Park, Sun-Young Kim, Sang Ho Ok, Si Young |
author_sort | Hwang, Insung |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Aquafol, a microemulsion propofol, causes more severe and frequent pain on injection than propofol. The purpose of this study was to compare a combination of lidocaine and ketamine on aquafol-induced pain with lidocaine or ketamine alone during the induction of anesthesia. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study, 130 healthy patients who were undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled. The patients received IV lidocaine 40 mg plus ketamine 25 mg (Group LK, n = 43), lidocaine 40 mg (Group L, n = 42), or ketamine 25 mg (Group K, n = 45) with a rubber tourniquet on the forearm 1 min before the injection of microemulsion propofol. The pain score was assessed by a 4-point verbal rating scale (VRS) at 10 seconds after injection of microemulsion propofol 30 mg and during the injection of the remaining total dose. RESULTS: The incidence and severity of pain was significantly lower in Group LK than Group L or Group K at 10 seconds after the injection of microemulsion propofol 30 mg (P < 0.05). And the incidence and severity of pain was significantly lower in Group LK and Group K than Group L during the injection of the remaining total dose (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with IV lidocaine 40 mg plus ketamine 25 mg with a rubber tourniquet on the forearm 1 min before the injection of microemulsion propofol is more effective than lidocaine 40 mg or ketamine 25 mg alone in preventing pain from the injection of microemulsion propofol. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2966702 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29667022010-11-05 Prevention of pain with the injection of microemulsion propofol: a comparison of a combination of lidocaine and ketamine with lidocaine or ketamine alone Hwang, Insung Noh, Jung Il Kim, Soon Im Kim, Mun-Gyu Park, Sun-Young Kim, Sang Ho Ok, Si Young Korean J Anesthesiol Clinical Research Article BACKGROUND: Aquafol, a microemulsion propofol, causes more severe and frequent pain on injection than propofol. The purpose of this study was to compare a combination of lidocaine and ketamine on aquafol-induced pain with lidocaine or ketamine alone during the induction of anesthesia. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study, 130 healthy patients who were undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled. The patients received IV lidocaine 40 mg plus ketamine 25 mg (Group LK, n = 43), lidocaine 40 mg (Group L, n = 42), or ketamine 25 mg (Group K, n = 45) with a rubber tourniquet on the forearm 1 min before the injection of microemulsion propofol. The pain score was assessed by a 4-point verbal rating scale (VRS) at 10 seconds after injection of microemulsion propofol 30 mg and during the injection of the remaining total dose. RESULTS: The incidence and severity of pain was significantly lower in Group LK than Group L or Group K at 10 seconds after the injection of microemulsion propofol 30 mg (P < 0.05). And the incidence and severity of pain was significantly lower in Group LK and Group K than Group L during the injection of the remaining total dose (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with IV lidocaine 40 mg plus ketamine 25 mg with a rubber tourniquet on the forearm 1 min before the injection of microemulsion propofol is more effective than lidocaine 40 mg or ketamine 25 mg alone in preventing pain from the injection of microemulsion propofol. The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2010-10 2010-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2966702/ /pubmed/21057611 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2010.59.4.233 Text en Copyright © The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2010 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Article Hwang, Insung Noh, Jung Il Kim, Soon Im Kim, Mun-Gyu Park, Sun-Young Kim, Sang Ho Ok, Si Young Prevention of pain with the injection of microemulsion propofol: a comparison of a combination of lidocaine and ketamine with lidocaine or ketamine alone |
title | Prevention of pain with the injection of microemulsion propofol: a comparison of a combination of lidocaine and ketamine with lidocaine or ketamine alone |
title_full | Prevention of pain with the injection of microemulsion propofol: a comparison of a combination of lidocaine and ketamine with lidocaine or ketamine alone |
title_fullStr | Prevention of pain with the injection of microemulsion propofol: a comparison of a combination of lidocaine and ketamine with lidocaine or ketamine alone |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevention of pain with the injection of microemulsion propofol: a comparison of a combination of lidocaine and ketamine with lidocaine or ketamine alone |
title_short | Prevention of pain with the injection of microemulsion propofol: a comparison of a combination of lidocaine and ketamine with lidocaine or ketamine alone |
title_sort | prevention of pain with the injection of microemulsion propofol: a comparison of a combination of lidocaine and ketamine with lidocaine or ketamine alone |
topic | Clinical Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2966702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21057611 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2010.59.4.233 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hwanginsung preventionofpainwiththeinjectionofmicroemulsionpropofolacomparisonofacombinationoflidocaineandketaminewithlidocaineorketaminealone AT nohjungil preventionofpainwiththeinjectionofmicroemulsionpropofolacomparisonofacombinationoflidocaineandketaminewithlidocaineorketaminealone AT kimsoonim preventionofpainwiththeinjectionofmicroemulsionpropofolacomparisonofacombinationoflidocaineandketaminewithlidocaineorketaminealone AT kimmungyu preventionofpainwiththeinjectionofmicroemulsionpropofolacomparisonofacombinationoflidocaineandketaminewithlidocaineorketaminealone AT parksunyoung preventionofpainwiththeinjectionofmicroemulsionpropofolacomparisonofacombinationoflidocaineandketaminewithlidocaineorketaminealone AT kimsangho preventionofpainwiththeinjectionofmicroemulsionpropofolacomparisonofacombinationoflidocaineandketaminewithlidocaineorketaminealone AT oksiyoung preventionofpainwiththeinjectionofmicroemulsionpropofolacomparisonofacombinationoflidocaineandketaminewithlidocaineorketaminealone |