Cargando…

Prevention of pain with the injection of microemulsion propofol: a comparison of a combination of lidocaine and ketamine with lidocaine or ketamine alone

BACKGROUND: Aquafol, a microemulsion propofol, causes more severe and frequent pain on injection than propofol. The purpose of this study was to compare a combination of lidocaine and ketamine on aquafol-induced pain with lidocaine or ketamine alone during the induction of anesthesia. METHODS: In th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hwang, Insung, Noh, Jung Il, Kim, Soon Im, Kim, Mun-Gyu, Park, Sun-Young, Kim, Sang Ho, Ok, Si Young
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2966702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21057611
http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2010.59.4.233
_version_ 1782189614853783552
author Hwang, Insung
Noh, Jung Il
Kim, Soon Im
Kim, Mun-Gyu
Park, Sun-Young
Kim, Sang Ho
Ok, Si Young
author_facet Hwang, Insung
Noh, Jung Il
Kim, Soon Im
Kim, Mun-Gyu
Park, Sun-Young
Kim, Sang Ho
Ok, Si Young
author_sort Hwang, Insung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Aquafol, a microemulsion propofol, causes more severe and frequent pain on injection than propofol. The purpose of this study was to compare a combination of lidocaine and ketamine on aquafol-induced pain with lidocaine or ketamine alone during the induction of anesthesia. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study, 130 healthy patients who were undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled. The patients received IV lidocaine 40 mg plus ketamine 25 mg (Group LK, n = 43), lidocaine 40 mg (Group L, n = 42), or ketamine 25 mg (Group K, n = 45) with a rubber tourniquet on the forearm 1 min before the injection of microemulsion propofol. The pain score was assessed by a 4-point verbal rating scale (VRS) at 10 seconds after injection of microemulsion propofol 30 mg and during the injection of the remaining total dose. RESULTS: The incidence and severity of pain was significantly lower in Group LK than Group L or Group K at 10 seconds after the injection of microemulsion propofol 30 mg (P < 0.05). And the incidence and severity of pain was significantly lower in Group LK and Group K than Group L during the injection of the remaining total dose (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with IV lidocaine 40 mg plus ketamine 25 mg with a rubber tourniquet on the forearm 1 min before the injection of microemulsion propofol is more effective than lidocaine 40 mg or ketamine 25 mg alone in preventing pain from the injection of microemulsion propofol.
format Text
id pubmed-2966702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29667022010-11-05 Prevention of pain with the injection of microemulsion propofol: a comparison of a combination of lidocaine and ketamine with lidocaine or ketamine alone Hwang, Insung Noh, Jung Il Kim, Soon Im Kim, Mun-Gyu Park, Sun-Young Kim, Sang Ho Ok, Si Young Korean J Anesthesiol Clinical Research Article BACKGROUND: Aquafol, a microemulsion propofol, causes more severe and frequent pain on injection than propofol. The purpose of this study was to compare a combination of lidocaine and ketamine on aquafol-induced pain with lidocaine or ketamine alone during the induction of anesthesia. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study, 130 healthy patients who were undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled. The patients received IV lidocaine 40 mg plus ketamine 25 mg (Group LK, n = 43), lidocaine 40 mg (Group L, n = 42), or ketamine 25 mg (Group K, n = 45) with a rubber tourniquet on the forearm 1 min before the injection of microemulsion propofol. The pain score was assessed by a 4-point verbal rating scale (VRS) at 10 seconds after injection of microemulsion propofol 30 mg and during the injection of the remaining total dose. RESULTS: The incidence and severity of pain was significantly lower in Group LK than Group L or Group K at 10 seconds after the injection of microemulsion propofol 30 mg (P < 0.05). And the incidence and severity of pain was significantly lower in Group LK and Group K than Group L during the injection of the remaining total dose (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with IV lidocaine 40 mg plus ketamine 25 mg with a rubber tourniquet on the forearm 1 min before the injection of microemulsion propofol is more effective than lidocaine 40 mg or ketamine 25 mg alone in preventing pain from the injection of microemulsion propofol. The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2010-10 2010-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2966702/ /pubmed/21057611 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2010.59.4.233 Text en Copyright © The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2010 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Article
Hwang, Insung
Noh, Jung Il
Kim, Soon Im
Kim, Mun-Gyu
Park, Sun-Young
Kim, Sang Ho
Ok, Si Young
Prevention of pain with the injection of microemulsion propofol: a comparison of a combination of lidocaine and ketamine with lidocaine or ketamine alone
title Prevention of pain with the injection of microemulsion propofol: a comparison of a combination of lidocaine and ketamine with lidocaine or ketamine alone
title_full Prevention of pain with the injection of microemulsion propofol: a comparison of a combination of lidocaine and ketamine with lidocaine or ketamine alone
title_fullStr Prevention of pain with the injection of microemulsion propofol: a comparison of a combination of lidocaine and ketamine with lidocaine or ketamine alone
title_full_unstemmed Prevention of pain with the injection of microemulsion propofol: a comparison of a combination of lidocaine and ketamine with lidocaine or ketamine alone
title_short Prevention of pain with the injection of microemulsion propofol: a comparison of a combination of lidocaine and ketamine with lidocaine or ketamine alone
title_sort prevention of pain with the injection of microemulsion propofol: a comparison of a combination of lidocaine and ketamine with lidocaine or ketamine alone
topic Clinical Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2966702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21057611
http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2010.59.4.233
work_keys_str_mv AT hwanginsung preventionofpainwiththeinjectionofmicroemulsionpropofolacomparisonofacombinationoflidocaineandketaminewithlidocaineorketaminealone
AT nohjungil preventionofpainwiththeinjectionofmicroemulsionpropofolacomparisonofacombinationoflidocaineandketaminewithlidocaineorketaminealone
AT kimsoonim preventionofpainwiththeinjectionofmicroemulsionpropofolacomparisonofacombinationoflidocaineandketaminewithlidocaineorketaminealone
AT kimmungyu preventionofpainwiththeinjectionofmicroemulsionpropofolacomparisonofacombinationoflidocaineandketaminewithlidocaineorketaminealone
AT parksunyoung preventionofpainwiththeinjectionofmicroemulsionpropofolacomparisonofacombinationoflidocaineandketaminewithlidocaineorketaminealone
AT kimsangho preventionofpainwiththeinjectionofmicroemulsionpropofolacomparisonofacombinationoflidocaineandketaminewithlidocaineorketaminealone
AT oksiyoung preventionofpainwiththeinjectionofmicroemulsionpropofolacomparisonofacombinationoflidocaineandketaminewithlidocaineorketaminealone