Cargando…

Prospective Durability Testing of a Vascular Access Phantom

INTRODUCTION: We assessed the acoustic transmission, image quality, and vessel integrity of the Blue Phantom™ 2 Vessel Original Ultrasound Training Model with repeated use. METHODS: The study consisted of two phases. During the first phase, a portion of the Blue Phantom™ rubber matrix (without a sim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schofer, Joel M., Nomura, Jason T., Bauman, Michael J., Sierzenski, Paul R.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2967676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21079696
_version_ 1782189689889882112
author Schofer, Joel M.
Nomura, Jason T.
Bauman, Michael J.
Sierzenski, Paul R.
author_facet Schofer, Joel M.
Nomura, Jason T.
Bauman, Michael J.
Sierzenski, Paul R.
author_sort Schofer, Joel M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We assessed the acoustic transmission, image quality, and vessel integrity of the Blue Phantom™ 2 Vessel Original Ultrasound Training Model with repeated use. METHODS: The study consisted of two phases. During the first phase, a portion of the Blue Phantom™ rubber matrix (without a simulated vessel) was placed over a two-tiered echogenic structure and was repeatedly punctured with a hollow bore 18-gauge needle in a 1 cm(2) area. During the second phase, a portion of the matrix with a simulated vessel was repeatedly punctured with another hollow bore 18-gauge needle. During both phases we obtained an ultrasound image using a high-frequency linear probe after every 100 needle punctures to assess the effect of repeated needle punctures on image quality, acoustic transmission, and simulated vessel integrity. RESULTS: Testing on the rubber matrix alone (first phase) without a vessel demonstrated a gradual decrease in image quality and visualization of the proximal and distal portions of the target structure, but they remained visible after 1,000 needle punctures. The second phase demonstrated excellent acoustic transmission and image quality on both transverse and longitudinal images of the rubber matrix and simulated vessel after 1,000 needle punctures. The anterior and posterior vessel walls and needle tip were well visualized without any signs of vessel leakage on still images or with compression and power Doppler. CONCLUSION: The Blue Phantom™ 2 Vessel Original Ultrasound Training Model demonstrated excellent durability after 1,000 needle punctures in a 1- cm(2) area. Based on the length of simulated vessel in each model, it should support over 25,000 simulated attempts at vascular access.
format Text
id pubmed-2967676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29676762010-11-15 Prospective Durability Testing of a Vascular Access Phantom Schofer, Joel M. Nomura, Jason T. Bauman, Michael J. Sierzenski, Paul R. West J Emerg Med Ultrasound INTRODUCTION: We assessed the acoustic transmission, image quality, and vessel integrity of the Blue Phantom™ 2 Vessel Original Ultrasound Training Model with repeated use. METHODS: The study consisted of two phases. During the first phase, a portion of the Blue Phantom™ rubber matrix (without a simulated vessel) was placed over a two-tiered echogenic structure and was repeatedly punctured with a hollow bore 18-gauge needle in a 1 cm(2) area. During the second phase, a portion of the matrix with a simulated vessel was repeatedly punctured with another hollow bore 18-gauge needle. During both phases we obtained an ultrasound image using a high-frequency linear probe after every 100 needle punctures to assess the effect of repeated needle punctures on image quality, acoustic transmission, and simulated vessel integrity. RESULTS: Testing on the rubber matrix alone (first phase) without a vessel demonstrated a gradual decrease in image quality and visualization of the proximal and distal portions of the target structure, but they remained visible after 1,000 needle punctures. The second phase demonstrated excellent acoustic transmission and image quality on both transverse and longitudinal images of the rubber matrix and simulated vessel after 1,000 needle punctures. The anterior and posterior vessel walls and needle tip were well visualized without any signs of vessel leakage on still images or with compression and power Doppler. CONCLUSION: The Blue Phantom™ 2 Vessel Original Ultrasound Training Model demonstrated excellent durability after 1,000 needle punctures in a 1- cm(2) area. Based on the length of simulated vessel in each model, it should support over 25,000 simulated attempts at vascular access. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2010-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2967676/ /pubmed/21079696 Text en Copyright © 2010 the authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Ultrasound
Schofer, Joel M.
Nomura, Jason T.
Bauman, Michael J.
Sierzenski, Paul R.
Prospective Durability Testing of a Vascular Access Phantom
title Prospective Durability Testing of a Vascular Access Phantom
title_full Prospective Durability Testing of a Vascular Access Phantom
title_fullStr Prospective Durability Testing of a Vascular Access Phantom
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Durability Testing of a Vascular Access Phantom
title_short Prospective Durability Testing of a Vascular Access Phantom
title_sort prospective durability testing of a vascular access phantom
topic Ultrasound
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2967676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21079696
work_keys_str_mv AT schoferjoelm prospectivedurabilitytestingofavascularaccessphantom
AT nomurajasont prospectivedurabilitytestingofavascularaccessphantom
AT baumanmichaelj prospectivedurabilitytestingofavascularaccessphantom
AT sierzenskipaulr prospectivedurabilitytestingofavascularaccessphantom