Cargando…

Is the Comet Assay a Sensitive Procedure for Detecting Genotoxicity?

Although the Comet assay, a procedure for quantitating DNA damage in mammalian cells, is considered sensitive, it has never been ascertained that its sensitivity is higher than the sensitivity of other genotoxicity assays in mammalian cells. To determine whether the power of the Comet assay to detec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kawaguchi, Satomi, Nakamura, Takanori, Yamamoto, Ayumi, Honda, Gisho, Sasaki, Yu F.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2967831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21052491
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2010/541050
_version_ 1782189705088991232
author Kawaguchi, Satomi
Nakamura, Takanori
Yamamoto, Ayumi
Honda, Gisho
Sasaki, Yu F.
author_facet Kawaguchi, Satomi
Nakamura, Takanori
Yamamoto, Ayumi
Honda, Gisho
Sasaki, Yu F.
author_sort Kawaguchi, Satomi
collection PubMed
description Although the Comet assay, a procedure for quantitating DNA damage in mammalian cells, is considered sensitive, it has never been ascertained that its sensitivity is higher than the sensitivity of other genotoxicity assays in mammalian cells. To determine whether the power of the Comet assay to detect a low level of genotoxic potential is superior to those of other genotoxicity assays in mammalian cells, we compared the results of Comet assay with those of micronucleus test (MN test). WTK1 human lymphoblastoid cells were exposed to methyl nitrosourea (MNU), ethyl nitrosourea (ENU), methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), bleomycin (BLM), or UVC. In Comet assay, cells were exposed to each mutagen with (Comet assay/araC) and without (Comet assay) DNA repair inhibitors (araC and hydroxyurea). Furthermore, acellular Comet assay (acellular assay) was performed to determine how single-strand breaks (SSBs) as the initial damage contributes to DNA migration and/or to micronucleus formation. The lowest genotoxic dose (LGD), which is defined as the lowest dose at which each mutagen causes a positive response on each genotoxicity assay, was used to compare the power of the Comet assay to detect a low level of genotoxic potential and that of MN test; that is, a low LGD indicates a high power. Results are summarized as follows: (1) for all mutagens studied, LGDs were MN test ≦ Comet assay; (2) except for BLM, LGDs were Comet assay/araC ≦ MN test; (3) except for UVC and MNU, LGDs were acellular assay ≦ Comet assay/araC ≦ MN test ≦ Comet assay. The following is suggested by the present findings: (1) LGD in the Comet assay is higher than that in MN test, which suggests that the power of the MN test to detect a low level of genotoxic potential is superior to that of the Comet assay; (2) for the studied mutagens, all assays were able to detect all mutagens correctly, which suggests that the sensitivity of the Comet assay and that of the MN test were exactly identical; (3) the power of the Comet assay to detect a low level of genotoxic potential can be elevated to a level higher than that of MN test by using DNA resynthesis inhibitors, such as araC and HU.
format Text
id pubmed-2967831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29678312010-11-04 Is the Comet Assay a Sensitive Procedure for Detecting Genotoxicity? Kawaguchi, Satomi Nakamura, Takanori Yamamoto, Ayumi Honda, Gisho Sasaki, Yu F. J Nucleic Acids Research Article Although the Comet assay, a procedure for quantitating DNA damage in mammalian cells, is considered sensitive, it has never been ascertained that its sensitivity is higher than the sensitivity of other genotoxicity assays in mammalian cells. To determine whether the power of the Comet assay to detect a low level of genotoxic potential is superior to those of other genotoxicity assays in mammalian cells, we compared the results of Comet assay with those of micronucleus test (MN test). WTK1 human lymphoblastoid cells were exposed to methyl nitrosourea (MNU), ethyl nitrosourea (ENU), methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), bleomycin (BLM), or UVC. In Comet assay, cells were exposed to each mutagen with (Comet assay/araC) and without (Comet assay) DNA repair inhibitors (araC and hydroxyurea). Furthermore, acellular Comet assay (acellular assay) was performed to determine how single-strand breaks (SSBs) as the initial damage contributes to DNA migration and/or to micronucleus formation. The lowest genotoxic dose (LGD), which is defined as the lowest dose at which each mutagen causes a positive response on each genotoxicity assay, was used to compare the power of the Comet assay to detect a low level of genotoxic potential and that of MN test; that is, a low LGD indicates a high power. Results are summarized as follows: (1) for all mutagens studied, LGDs were MN test ≦ Comet assay; (2) except for BLM, LGDs were Comet assay/araC ≦ MN test; (3) except for UVC and MNU, LGDs were acellular assay ≦ Comet assay/araC ≦ MN test ≦ Comet assay. The following is suggested by the present findings: (1) LGD in the Comet assay is higher than that in MN test, which suggests that the power of the MN test to detect a low level of genotoxic potential is superior to that of the Comet assay; (2) for the studied mutagens, all assays were able to detect all mutagens correctly, which suggests that the sensitivity of the Comet assay and that of the MN test were exactly identical; (3) the power of the Comet assay to detect a low level of genotoxic potential can be elevated to a level higher than that of MN test by using DNA resynthesis inhibitors, such as araC and HU. SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research 2010-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2967831/ /pubmed/21052491 http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2010/541050 Text en Copyright © 2010 Satomi Kawaguchi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kawaguchi, Satomi
Nakamura, Takanori
Yamamoto, Ayumi
Honda, Gisho
Sasaki, Yu F.
Is the Comet Assay a Sensitive Procedure for Detecting Genotoxicity?
title Is the Comet Assay a Sensitive Procedure for Detecting Genotoxicity?
title_full Is the Comet Assay a Sensitive Procedure for Detecting Genotoxicity?
title_fullStr Is the Comet Assay a Sensitive Procedure for Detecting Genotoxicity?
title_full_unstemmed Is the Comet Assay a Sensitive Procedure for Detecting Genotoxicity?
title_short Is the Comet Assay a Sensitive Procedure for Detecting Genotoxicity?
title_sort is the comet assay a sensitive procedure for detecting genotoxicity?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2967831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21052491
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2010/541050
work_keys_str_mv AT kawaguchisatomi isthecometassayasensitiveprocedurefordetectinggenotoxicity
AT nakamuratakanori isthecometassayasensitiveprocedurefordetectinggenotoxicity
AT yamamotoayumi isthecometassayasensitiveprocedurefordetectinggenotoxicity
AT hondagisho isthecometassayasensitiveprocedurefordetectinggenotoxicity
AT sasakiyuf isthecometassayasensitiveprocedurefordetectinggenotoxicity