Cargando…

A Comparison of Two Anastomotic Techniques in the Jejunum of the Goat

This study was carried out to test two different anastomotic techniques to identify advantages and disadvantages of each technique in goats. All animals were under local infiltration anaesthesia. A five-cm length of jejunum was resected from the first part of the jejunum and end to end anastomosis u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Timmemi, H. A., Al-Jashamy, Karim, Dauod, Mohammed S.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2968414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21052536
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2010/139610
_version_ 1782189868825182208
author Al-Timmemi, H. A.
Al-Jashamy, Karim
Dauod, Mohammed S.
author_facet Al-Timmemi, H. A.
Al-Jashamy, Karim
Dauod, Mohammed S.
author_sort Al-Timmemi, H. A.
collection PubMed
description This study was carried out to test two different anastomotic techniques to identify advantages and disadvantages of each technique in goats. All animals were under local infiltration anaesthesia. A five-cm length of jejunum was resected from the first part of the jejunum and end to end anastomosis using 3-0 Polygalactin-910 with one row of sero-submoucosal interrupted sutures (SSIS) group, and one row of horizontal mattress interrupted sutures (HMIS) group. Two animals from each group were euthanized on the 4th, 14th and 21st postoperative days. A 7-cm segment of jejunum including the anastomosed area was resected from each animal. There was no significant adhesion between anastomosis area and surrounded tissues observed in SSIS animals, while there was significant adhesion between anastomosis area and surrounded tissues which were observed in HMIS animals. Stenosis degree was lower in the SSIS than the HMIS group. The bursting pressure was higher in the SSIS than the HMIS group. Macroscopic evaluation indicated that the anastomotic line mucosa was abridged better with less local edema in the SSIS group. Histological evaluation in the SSIS group showed almost all parameters such as epithelial recovery and repair of submucosal-mucosal layer demonstrated better healing compared to the HMIS group.
format Text
id pubmed-2968414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29684142010-11-04 A Comparison of Two Anastomotic Techniques in the Jejunum of the Goat Al-Timmemi, H. A. Al-Jashamy, Karim Dauod, Mohammed S. Vet Med Int Research Article This study was carried out to test two different anastomotic techniques to identify advantages and disadvantages of each technique in goats. All animals were under local infiltration anaesthesia. A five-cm length of jejunum was resected from the first part of the jejunum and end to end anastomosis using 3-0 Polygalactin-910 with one row of sero-submoucosal interrupted sutures (SSIS) group, and one row of horizontal mattress interrupted sutures (HMIS) group. Two animals from each group were euthanized on the 4th, 14th and 21st postoperative days. A 7-cm segment of jejunum including the anastomosed area was resected from each animal. There was no significant adhesion between anastomosis area and surrounded tissues observed in SSIS animals, while there was significant adhesion between anastomosis area and surrounded tissues which were observed in HMIS animals. Stenosis degree was lower in the SSIS than the HMIS group. The bursting pressure was higher in the SSIS than the HMIS group. Macroscopic evaluation indicated that the anastomotic line mucosa was abridged better with less local edema in the SSIS group. Histological evaluation in the SSIS group showed almost all parameters such as epithelial recovery and repair of submucosal-mucosal layer demonstrated better healing compared to the HMIS group. SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research 2010-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2968414/ /pubmed/21052536 http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2010/139610 Text en Copyright © 2010 H. A. Al-Timmemi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Al-Timmemi, H. A.
Al-Jashamy, Karim
Dauod, Mohammed S.
A Comparison of Two Anastomotic Techniques in the Jejunum of the Goat
title A Comparison of Two Anastomotic Techniques in the Jejunum of the Goat
title_full A Comparison of Two Anastomotic Techniques in the Jejunum of the Goat
title_fullStr A Comparison of Two Anastomotic Techniques in the Jejunum of the Goat
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Two Anastomotic Techniques in the Jejunum of the Goat
title_short A Comparison of Two Anastomotic Techniques in the Jejunum of the Goat
title_sort comparison of two anastomotic techniques in the jejunum of the goat
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2968414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21052536
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2010/139610
work_keys_str_mv AT altimmemiha acomparisonoftwoanastomotictechniquesinthejejunumofthegoat
AT aljashamykarim acomparisonoftwoanastomotictechniquesinthejejunumofthegoat
AT dauodmohammeds acomparisonoftwoanastomotictechniquesinthejejunumofthegoat
AT altimmemiha comparisonoftwoanastomotictechniquesinthejejunumofthegoat
AT aljashamykarim comparisonoftwoanastomotictechniquesinthejejunumofthegoat
AT dauodmohammeds comparisonoftwoanastomotictechniquesinthejejunumofthegoat