Cargando…

Tinidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the commonest cause of vaginal discharge in women of childbearing age. Oral metronidazole has long been established as an effective therapy in the treatment of BV. However, adverse effects due to metronidazole are frequent and this may lead to problems with adherence to a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Armstrong, Nicola R, Wilson, Janet D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2971702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21072275
_version_ 1782190647925538816
author Armstrong, Nicola R
Wilson, Janet D
author_facet Armstrong, Nicola R
Wilson, Janet D
author_sort Armstrong, Nicola R
collection PubMed
description Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the commonest cause of vaginal discharge in women of childbearing age. Oral metronidazole has long been established as an effective therapy in the treatment of BV. However, adverse effects due to metronidazole are frequent and this may lead to problems with adherence to a 7-day course of treatment and subsequently result in treatment failure. Oral tinidazole has been used to treat bacterial vaginosis for over 25 years but in a number of different dosage regimens. Placebo controlled trials have consistently shown increases in cure rate with tinidazole. Longer courses of treatment (eg, 1 g daily for 5 days) appear to be more effective than a 2 g oral single dose. Comparative studies suggest that oral tinidazole is equivalent to oral metronidazole, intravaginal clindamycin cream, and intravaginal metronidazole tablets, in efficacy in treating BV. However, tinidazole has a more favorable side effect profile than oral metronidazole notably with better gastrointestinal tolerability and less metallic taste. Bacterial vaginosis is associated with high rates of recurrence and appropriate management of such recurrences can prove difficult. Recurrent BV has been linked with persistence of Gardnerella vaginalis after treatment; however the clinical implications of the possible greater activity of tinidazole against G. vaginalis are not yet clear. Repeated courses of oral metronidazole may be poorly tolerated and an alternative but equally effective treatment that is better tolerated may be preferable. In comparison to oral metronidazole, cost is clearly an issue as oral metronidazole is considerably cheaper and available in generic form. However where avoidance of oral metronidazole is necessary because of side effects, oral tinidazole is a cost-effective alternative.
format Text
id pubmed-2971702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29717022010-11-10 Tinidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis Armstrong, Nicola R Wilson, Janet D Int J Womens Health Review Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the commonest cause of vaginal discharge in women of childbearing age. Oral metronidazole has long been established as an effective therapy in the treatment of BV. However, adverse effects due to metronidazole are frequent and this may lead to problems with adherence to a 7-day course of treatment and subsequently result in treatment failure. Oral tinidazole has been used to treat bacterial vaginosis for over 25 years but in a number of different dosage regimens. Placebo controlled trials have consistently shown increases in cure rate with tinidazole. Longer courses of treatment (eg, 1 g daily for 5 days) appear to be more effective than a 2 g oral single dose. Comparative studies suggest that oral tinidazole is equivalent to oral metronidazole, intravaginal clindamycin cream, and intravaginal metronidazole tablets, in efficacy in treating BV. However, tinidazole has a more favorable side effect profile than oral metronidazole notably with better gastrointestinal tolerability and less metallic taste. Bacterial vaginosis is associated with high rates of recurrence and appropriate management of such recurrences can prove difficult. Recurrent BV has been linked with persistence of Gardnerella vaginalis after treatment; however the clinical implications of the possible greater activity of tinidazole against G. vaginalis are not yet clear. Repeated courses of oral metronidazole may be poorly tolerated and an alternative but equally effective treatment that is better tolerated may be preferable. In comparison to oral metronidazole, cost is clearly an issue as oral metronidazole is considerably cheaper and available in generic form. However where avoidance of oral metronidazole is necessary because of side effects, oral tinidazole is a cost-effective alternative. Dove Medical Press 2010-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2971702/ /pubmed/21072275 Text en © 2009 Armstrong and Wilson, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Armstrong, Nicola R
Wilson, Janet D
Tinidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis
title Tinidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis
title_full Tinidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis
title_fullStr Tinidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis
title_full_unstemmed Tinidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis
title_short Tinidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis
title_sort tinidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2971702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21072275
work_keys_str_mv AT armstrongnicolar tinidazoleinthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosis
AT wilsonjanetd tinidazoleinthetreatmentofbacterialvaginosis