Cargando…

Emergency contraception: potential role of ulipristal acetate

Unintended pregnancy is a global reproductive health problem. Emergency contraception (EC) provides women with a safe means of preventing unwanted pregnancies after having unprotected intercourse. While 1.5 mg of levonorgestrel (LNG) as a single dose or in 2 doses with 12 hours apart is the currentl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina, Meng, Chun-Xia
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2971744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21072297
_version_ 1782190657883865088
author Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
Meng, Chun-Xia
author_facet Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
Meng, Chun-Xia
author_sort Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
collection PubMed
description Unintended pregnancy is a global reproductive health problem. Emergency contraception (EC) provides women with a safe means of preventing unwanted pregnancies after having unprotected intercourse. While 1.5 mg of levonorgestrel (LNG) as a single dose or in 2 doses with 12 hours apart is the currently gold standard EC regimen, a single dose of 30 mg ulipristal acetate (UPA) has recently been proposed for EC use up to 120 hours of unprotected intercourse with similar side effect profiles as LNG. The main mechanism of action of both LNG and UPA for EC is delaying or inhibiting ovulation. However, the ‘window of effect’ for LNG EC seems to be rather narrow, beginning after selection of the dominant follicular and ending when luteinizing hormone peak begins to rise, whereas UPA appears to have a direct inhibitory effect on follicular rupture which allows it to be also effective even when administered shortly before ovulation, a time period when use of LNG is no longer effective. These experimental findings are in line with results from a series of clinical trials conducted recently which demonstrate that UPA seems to have higher EC efficacy compared to LNG. This review summarizes some of the data available on UPA used after unprotected intercourse with the purpose to provide evidence that UPA, a new type of second-generation progesterone receptor modulator, represents a new evolutionary step in EC treatment.
format Text
id pubmed-2971744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29717442010-11-10 Emergency contraception: potential role of ulipristal acetate Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina Meng, Chun-Xia Int J Womens Health Review Unintended pregnancy is a global reproductive health problem. Emergency contraception (EC) provides women with a safe means of preventing unwanted pregnancies after having unprotected intercourse. While 1.5 mg of levonorgestrel (LNG) as a single dose or in 2 doses with 12 hours apart is the currently gold standard EC regimen, a single dose of 30 mg ulipristal acetate (UPA) has recently been proposed for EC use up to 120 hours of unprotected intercourse with similar side effect profiles as LNG. The main mechanism of action of both LNG and UPA for EC is delaying or inhibiting ovulation. However, the ‘window of effect’ for LNG EC seems to be rather narrow, beginning after selection of the dominant follicular and ending when luteinizing hormone peak begins to rise, whereas UPA appears to have a direct inhibitory effect on follicular rupture which allows it to be also effective even when administered shortly before ovulation, a time period when use of LNG is no longer effective. These experimental findings are in line with results from a series of clinical trials conducted recently which demonstrate that UPA seems to have higher EC efficacy compared to LNG. This review summarizes some of the data available on UPA used after unprotected intercourse with the purpose to provide evidence that UPA, a new type of second-generation progesterone receptor modulator, represents a new evolutionary step in EC treatment. Dove Medical Press 2010-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2971744/ /pubmed/21072297 Text en © 2010 Gemzell-Danielsson and Meng, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
Meng, Chun-Xia
Emergency contraception: potential role of ulipristal acetate
title Emergency contraception: potential role of ulipristal acetate
title_full Emergency contraception: potential role of ulipristal acetate
title_fullStr Emergency contraception: potential role of ulipristal acetate
title_full_unstemmed Emergency contraception: potential role of ulipristal acetate
title_short Emergency contraception: potential role of ulipristal acetate
title_sort emergency contraception: potential role of ulipristal acetate
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2971744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21072297
work_keys_str_mv AT gemzelldanielssonkristina emergencycontraceptionpotentialroleofulipristalacetate
AT mengchunxia emergencycontraceptionpotentialroleofulipristalacetate