Cargando…

Segmental stabilization and muscular strengthening in chronic low back pain ‐ a comparative study

OBJECTIVE: To contrast the efficacy of two exercise programs, segmental stabilization and strengthening of abdominal and trunk muscles, on pain, functional disability, and activation of the transversus abdominis muscle (TrA), in individuals with chronic low back pain. DESIGN: Our sample consisted of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: França, Fábio Renovato, Burke, Thomaz Nogueira, Hanada, Erica Sato, Marques, Amélia Pasqual
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2972594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21120303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322010001000015
_version_ 1782190813538680832
author França, Fábio Renovato
Burke, Thomaz Nogueira
Hanada, Erica Sato
Marques, Amélia Pasqual
author_facet França, Fábio Renovato
Burke, Thomaz Nogueira
Hanada, Erica Sato
Marques, Amélia Pasqual
author_sort França, Fábio Renovato
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To contrast the efficacy of two exercise programs, segmental stabilization and strengthening of abdominal and trunk muscles, on pain, functional disability, and activation of the transversus abdominis muscle (TrA), in individuals with chronic low back pain. DESIGN: Our sample consisted of 30 individuals, randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: segmental stabilization, where exercises focused on the TrA and lumbar multifidus muscles, and superficial strengthening, where exercises focused on the rectus abdominis, abdominus obliquus internus, abdominus obliquus externus, and erector spinae. Groups were examined to discovere whether the exercises created contrasts regarding pain (visual analogical scale and McGill pain questionnaire), functional disability (Oswestry disability questionnaire), and TrA muscle activation capacity (Pressure Biofeedback Unit  =  PBU). The program lasted 6 weeks, and 30‐minute sessions occurred twice a week. Analysis of variance was used for inter‐ and intra‐group comparisons. The significance level was established at 5%. RESULTS: As compared to baseline, both treatments were effective in relieving pain and improving disability (p<0.001). Those in the segmental stabilization group had significant gains for all variables when compared to the ST group (p<0.001), including TrA activation, where relative gains were 48.3% and ‐5.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both techniques lessened pain and reduced disability. Segmental stabilization is superior to superficial strengthening for all variables. Superficial strengthening does not improve TrA activation capacity.
format Text
id pubmed-2972594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29725942010-11-04 Segmental stabilization and muscular strengthening in chronic low back pain ‐ a comparative study França, Fábio Renovato Burke, Thomaz Nogueira Hanada, Erica Sato Marques, Amélia Pasqual Clinics (Sao Paulo) Clinical Science OBJECTIVE: To contrast the efficacy of two exercise programs, segmental stabilization and strengthening of abdominal and trunk muscles, on pain, functional disability, and activation of the transversus abdominis muscle (TrA), in individuals with chronic low back pain. DESIGN: Our sample consisted of 30 individuals, randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: segmental stabilization, where exercises focused on the TrA and lumbar multifidus muscles, and superficial strengthening, where exercises focused on the rectus abdominis, abdominus obliquus internus, abdominus obliquus externus, and erector spinae. Groups were examined to discovere whether the exercises created contrasts regarding pain (visual analogical scale and McGill pain questionnaire), functional disability (Oswestry disability questionnaire), and TrA muscle activation capacity (Pressure Biofeedback Unit  =  PBU). The program lasted 6 weeks, and 30‐minute sessions occurred twice a week. Analysis of variance was used for inter‐ and intra‐group comparisons. The significance level was established at 5%. RESULTS: As compared to baseline, both treatments were effective in relieving pain and improving disability (p<0.001). Those in the segmental stabilization group had significant gains for all variables when compared to the ST group (p<0.001), including TrA activation, where relative gains were 48.3% and ‐5.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both techniques lessened pain and reduced disability. Segmental stabilization is superior to superficial strengthening for all variables. Superficial strengthening does not improve TrA activation capacity. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2010-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2972594/ /pubmed/21120303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322010001000015 Text en Copyright © 2010 Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Science
França, Fábio Renovato
Burke, Thomaz Nogueira
Hanada, Erica Sato
Marques, Amélia Pasqual
Segmental stabilization and muscular strengthening in chronic low back pain ‐ a comparative study
title Segmental stabilization and muscular strengthening in chronic low back pain ‐ a comparative study
title_full Segmental stabilization and muscular strengthening in chronic low back pain ‐ a comparative study
title_fullStr Segmental stabilization and muscular strengthening in chronic low back pain ‐ a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Segmental stabilization and muscular strengthening in chronic low back pain ‐ a comparative study
title_short Segmental stabilization and muscular strengthening in chronic low back pain ‐ a comparative study
title_sort segmental stabilization and muscular strengthening in chronic low back pain ‐ a comparative study
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2972594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21120303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322010001000015
work_keys_str_mv AT francafabiorenovato segmentalstabilizationandmuscularstrengtheninginchroniclowbackpainacomparativestudy
AT burkethomaznogueira segmentalstabilizationandmuscularstrengtheninginchroniclowbackpainacomparativestudy
AT hanadaericasato segmentalstabilizationandmuscularstrengtheninginchroniclowbackpainacomparativestudy
AT marquesameliapasqual segmentalstabilizationandmuscularstrengtheninginchroniclowbackpainacomparativestudy