Cargando…
Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study
BACKGROUND: Mesalamine is the first-line drug for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We directly compared the efficacy and safety of two mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with UC. METHODS: In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study, 229 patients with mil...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2972638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20049950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ibd.21193 |
_version_ | 1782190819911925760 |
---|---|
author | Ito, Hiroaki Iida, Mitsuo Matsumoto, Takayuki Suzuki, Yasuo Sasaki, Hidetaka Yoshida, Toyomitsu Takano, Yuichi Hibi, Toshifumi |
author_facet | Ito, Hiroaki Iida, Mitsuo Matsumoto, Takayuki Suzuki, Yasuo Sasaki, Hidetaka Yoshida, Toyomitsu Takano, Yuichi Hibi, Toshifumi |
author_sort | Ito, Hiroaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mesalamine is the first-line drug for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We directly compared the efficacy and safety of two mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with UC. METHODS: In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study, 229 patients with mild-to-moderate active UC were assigned to 4 groups: 66 and 65 received a pH-dependent release formulation of 2.4 g/day (pH-2.4 g) or 3.6 g/day (pH-3.6 g), respectively; 65 received a time-dependent release formulation of 2.25 g/day (Time-2.25 g), and 33 received placebo (Placebo). The drugs were administered three times daily for eight weeks. The primary endpoint was a decrease in the UC disease activity index (UC-DAI). RESULTS: In the full analysis set (n = 225) the decrease in UC-DAI in each group was 1.5 in pH-2.4 g, 2.9 in pH-3.6 g, 1.3 in Time-2.25 g and 0.3 in Placebo, respectively. These results demonstrate the superiority of pH-3.6 g over Time-2.25 g (P = 0.003) and the noninferiority of pH-2.4 g to Time-2.25 g. Among the patients with proctitis-type UC, a significant decrease in UC-DAI was observed in pH-2.4 g and pH-3.6 g as compared to Placebo, but not in Time-2.25 g. No differences were observed in the safety profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Higher dose of the pH-dependent release formulation was more effective for induction of remission in patients with mild-to-moderate active UC. Additionally, the pH-dependent release formulation was preferable to the time-dependent release formulation for patients with proctitis-type UC (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, no. C000000288). (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2010) |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2972638 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29726382010-11-11 Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study Ito, Hiroaki Iida, Mitsuo Matsumoto, Takayuki Suzuki, Yasuo Sasaki, Hidetaka Yoshida, Toyomitsu Takano, Yuichi Hibi, Toshifumi Inflamm Bowel Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Mesalamine is the first-line drug for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We directly compared the efficacy and safety of two mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with UC. METHODS: In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study, 229 patients with mild-to-moderate active UC were assigned to 4 groups: 66 and 65 received a pH-dependent release formulation of 2.4 g/day (pH-2.4 g) or 3.6 g/day (pH-3.6 g), respectively; 65 received a time-dependent release formulation of 2.25 g/day (Time-2.25 g), and 33 received placebo (Placebo). The drugs were administered three times daily for eight weeks. The primary endpoint was a decrease in the UC disease activity index (UC-DAI). RESULTS: In the full analysis set (n = 225) the decrease in UC-DAI in each group was 1.5 in pH-2.4 g, 2.9 in pH-3.6 g, 1.3 in Time-2.25 g and 0.3 in Placebo, respectively. These results demonstrate the superiority of pH-3.6 g over Time-2.25 g (P = 0.003) and the noninferiority of pH-2.4 g to Time-2.25 g. Among the patients with proctitis-type UC, a significant decrease in UC-DAI was observed in pH-2.4 g and pH-3.6 g as compared to Placebo, but not in Time-2.25 g. No differences were observed in the safety profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Higher dose of the pH-dependent release formulation was more effective for induction of remission in patients with mild-to-moderate active UC. Additionally, the pH-dependent release formulation was preferable to the time-dependent release formulation for patients with proctitis-type UC (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, no. C000000288). (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2010) Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 2010-09 2010-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2972638/ /pubmed/20049950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ibd.21193 Text en Copyright © 2010 Crohn's & Colitis Foundation of America, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ito, Hiroaki Iida, Mitsuo Matsumoto, Takayuki Suzuki, Yasuo Sasaki, Hidetaka Yoshida, Toyomitsu Takano, Yuichi Hibi, Toshifumi Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study |
title | Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study |
title_full | Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study |
title_fullStr | Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study |
title_full_unstemmed | Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study |
title_short | Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study |
title_sort | direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, randomized study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2972638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20049950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ibd.21193 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT itohiroaki directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsfortheinductionofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy AT iidamitsuo directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsfortheinductionofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy AT matsumototakayuki directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsfortheinductionofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy AT suzukiyasuo directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsfortheinductionofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy AT sasakihidetaka directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsfortheinductionofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy AT yoshidatoyomitsu directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsfortheinductionofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy AT takanoyuichi directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsfortheinductionofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy AT hibitoshifumi directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsfortheinductionofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy |