Cargando…

Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study

BACKGROUND: Mesalamine is the first-line drug for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We directly compared the efficacy and safety of two mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with UC. METHODS: In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study, 229 patients with mil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ito, Hiroaki, Iida, Mitsuo, Matsumoto, Takayuki, Suzuki, Yasuo, Sasaki, Hidetaka, Yoshida, Toyomitsu, Takano, Yuichi, Hibi, Toshifumi
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2972638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20049950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ibd.21193
_version_ 1782190819911925760
author Ito, Hiroaki
Iida, Mitsuo
Matsumoto, Takayuki
Suzuki, Yasuo
Sasaki, Hidetaka
Yoshida, Toyomitsu
Takano, Yuichi
Hibi, Toshifumi
author_facet Ito, Hiroaki
Iida, Mitsuo
Matsumoto, Takayuki
Suzuki, Yasuo
Sasaki, Hidetaka
Yoshida, Toyomitsu
Takano, Yuichi
Hibi, Toshifumi
author_sort Ito, Hiroaki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mesalamine is the first-line drug for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We directly compared the efficacy and safety of two mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with UC. METHODS: In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study, 229 patients with mild-to-moderate active UC were assigned to 4 groups: 66 and 65 received a pH-dependent release formulation of 2.4 g/day (pH-2.4 g) or 3.6 g/day (pH-3.6 g), respectively; 65 received a time-dependent release formulation of 2.25 g/day (Time-2.25 g), and 33 received placebo (Placebo). The drugs were administered three times daily for eight weeks. The primary endpoint was a decrease in the UC disease activity index (UC-DAI). RESULTS: In the full analysis set (n = 225) the decrease in UC-DAI in each group was 1.5 in pH-2.4 g, 2.9 in pH-3.6 g, 1.3 in Time-2.25 g and 0.3 in Placebo, respectively. These results demonstrate the superiority of pH-3.6 g over Time-2.25 g (P = 0.003) and the noninferiority of pH-2.4 g to Time-2.25 g. Among the patients with proctitis-type UC, a significant decrease in UC-DAI was observed in pH-2.4 g and pH-3.6 g as compared to Placebo, but not in Time-2.25 g. No differences were observed in the safety profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Higher dose of the pH-dependent release formulation was more effective for induction of remission in patients with mild-to-moderate active UC. Additionally, the pH-dependent release formulation was preferable to the time-dependent release formulation for patients with proctitis-type UC (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, no. C000000288). (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2010)
format Text
id pubmed-2972638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29726382010-11-11 Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study Ito, Hiroaki Iida, Mitsuo Matsumoto, Takayuki Suzuki, Yasuo Sasaki, Hidetaka Yoshida, Toyomitsu Takano, Yuichi Hibi, Toshifumi Inflamm Bowel Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Mesalamine is the first-line drug for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We directly compared the efficacy and safety of two mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with UC. METHODS: In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study, 229 patients with mild-to-moderate active UC were assigned to 4 groups: 66 and 65 received a pH-dependent release formulation of 2.4 g/day (pH-2.4 g) or 3.6 g/day (pH-3.6 g), respectively; 65 received a time-dependent release formulation of 2.25 g/day (Time-2.25 g), and 33 received placebo (Placebo). The drugs were administered three times daily for eight weeks. The primary endpoint was a decrease in the UC disease activity index (UC-DAI). RESULTS: In the full analysis set (n = 225) the decrease in UC-DAI in each group was 1.5 in pH-2.4 g, 2.9 in pH-3.6 g, 1.3 in Time-2.25 g and 0.3 in Placebo, respectively. These results demonstrate the superiority of pH-3.6 g over Time-2.25 g (P = 0.003) and the noninferiority of pH-2.4 g to Time-2.25 g. Among the patients with proctitis-type UC, a significant decrease in UC-DAI was observed in pH-2.4 g and pH-3.6 g as compared to Placebo, but not in Time-2.25 g. No differences were observed in the safety profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Higher dose of the pH-dependent release formulation was more effective for induction of remission in patients with mild-to-moderate active UC. Additionally, the pH-dependent release formulation was preferable to the time-dependent release formulation for patients with proctitis-type UC (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, no. C000000288). (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2010) Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 2010-09 2010-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2972638/ /pubmed/20049950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ibd.21193 Text en Copyright © 2010 Crohn's & Colitis Foundation of America, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ito, Hiroaki
Iida, Mitsuo
Matsumoto, Takayuki
Suzuki, Yasuo
Sasaki, Hidetaka
Yoshida, Toyomitsu
Takano, Yuichi
Hibi, Toshifumi
Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study
title Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study
title_full Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study
title_fullStr Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study
title_full_unstemmed Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study
title_short Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study
title_sort direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, randomized study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2972638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20049950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ibd.21193
work_keys_str_mv AT itohiroaki directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsfortheinductionofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy
AT iidamitsuo directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsfortheinductionofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy
AT matsumototakayuki directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsfortheinductionofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy
AT suzukiyasuo directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsfortheinductionofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy
AT sasakihidetaka directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsfortheinductionofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy
AT yoshidatoyomitsu directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsfortheinductionofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy
AT takanoyuichi directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsfortheinductionofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy
AT hibitoshifumi directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsfortheinductionofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy