Cargando…

Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the maintenance of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study

BACKGROUND: Mesalamine has been used as the first-line medication for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We directly compared the efficacy and safety of two different mesalamine formulations in the maintenance of remission in patients with UC. METHODS: In a multicenter, double-blind, randomiz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ito, Hiroaki, Iida, Mitsuo, Matsumoto, Takayuki, Suzuki, Yasuo, Aida, Yoshiyuki, Yoshida, Toyomitsu, Takano, Yuichi, Hibi, Toshifumi
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2972641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20049949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ibd.21194
_version_ 1782190820642783232
author Ito, Hiroaki
Iida, Mitsuo
Matsumoto, Takayuki
Suzuki, Yasuo
Aida, Yoshiyuki
Yoshida, Toyomitsu
Takano, Yuichi
Hibi, Toshifumi
author_facet Ito, Hiroaki
Iida, Mitsuo
Matsumoto, Takayuki
Suzuki, Yasuo
Aida, Yoshiyuki
Yoshida, Toyomitsu
Takano, Yuichi
Hibi, Toshifumi
author_sort Ito, Hiroaki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mesalamine has been used as the first-line medication for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We directly compared the efficacy and safety of two different mesalamine formulations in the maintenance of remission in patients with UC. METHODS: In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study, 131 patients with quiescent UC were assigned to two groups: 65 to receive a pH-dependent release formulation of mesalamine at 2.4 g/day (pH-2.4 g) and 66 to receive a time-dependent release formulation of mesalamine at 2.25 g/day (Time-2.25 g). Both formulations were administered three times daily for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients without bloody stools. RESULTS: In the full analysis set (n = 130), the proportion of patients without bloody stools was 76.9% in the pH-2.4 g and 69.2% in the Time-2.25 g, demonstrating the noninferiority of pH-2.4 g to Time-2.25 g. No statistically significant difference in time to bloody stools was found between the two formulations (P = 0.27, log-rank test), but the time to bloody stools tended to be longer in pH-2.4 g compared to Time-2.25 g, and a similar trend was observed with regard to the time to relapse. No differences were observed between the safety profiles of the two formulations. CONCLUSIONS: The pH- and time-dependent release of mesalamine formulations were similarly safe and effective. Interestingly, the remission phase tended to be longer in the group that received the pH-dependent formulation compared to the group that received the time-dependent formulation (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, no. C000000289). (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2010)
format Text
id pubmed-2972641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29726412010-11-11 Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the maintenance of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study Ito, Hiroaki Iida, Mitsuo Matsumoto, Takayuki Suzuki, Yasuo Aida, Yoshiyuki Yoshida, Toyomitsu Takano, Yuichi Hibi, Toshifumi Inflamm Bowel Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Mesalamine has been used as the first-line medication for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We directly compared the efficacy and safety of two different mesalamine formulations in the maintenance of remission in patients with UC. METHODS: In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study, 131 patients with quiescent UC were assigned to two groups: 65 to receive a pH-dependent release formulation of mesalamine at 2.4 g/day (pH-2.4 g) and 66 to receive a time-dependent release formulation of mesalamine at 2.25 g/day (Time-2.25 g). Both formulations were administered three times daily for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients without bloody stools. RESULTS: In the full analysis set (n = 130), the proportion of patients without bloody stools was 76.9% in the pH-2.4 g and 69.2% in the Time-2.25 g, demonstrating the noninferiority of pH-2.4 g to Time-2.25 g. No statistically significant difference in time to bloody stools was found between the two formulations (P = 0.27, log-rank test), but the time to bloody stools tended to be longer in pH-2.4 g compared to Time-2.25 g, and a similar trend was observed with regard to the time to relapse. No differences were observed between the safety profiles of the two formulations. CONCLUSIONS: The pH- and time-dependent release of mesalamine formulations were similarly safe and effective. Interestingly, the remission phase tended to be longer in the group that received the pH-dependent formulation compared to the group that received the time-dependent formulation (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, no. C000000289). (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2010) Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 2010-09 2010-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2972641/ /pubmed/20049949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ibd.21194 Text en Copyright © 2010 Crohn's & Colitis Foundation of America, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ito, Hiroaki
Iida, Mitsuo
Matsumoto, Takayuki
Suzuki, Yasuo
Aida, Yoshiyuki
Yoshida, Toyomitsu
Takano, Yuichi
Hibi, Toshifumi
Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the maintenance of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study
title Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the maintenance of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study
title_full Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the maintenance of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study
title_fullStr Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the maintenance of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study
title_full_unstemmed Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the maintenance of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study
title_short Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the maintenance of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A double-blind, randomized study
title_sort direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the maintenance of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, randomized study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2972641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20049949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ibd.21194
work_keys_str_mv AT itohiroaki directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsforthemaintenanceofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy
AT iidamitsuo directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsforthemaintenanceofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy
AT matsumototakayuki directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsforthemaintenanceofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy
AT suzukiyasuo directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsforthemaintenanceofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy
AT aidayoshiyuki directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsforthemaintenanceofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy
AT yoshidatoyomitsu directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsforthemaintenanceofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy
AT takanoyuichi directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsforthemaintenanceofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy
AT hibitoshifumi directcomparisonoftwodifferentmesalamineformulationsforthemaintenanceofremissioninpatientswithulcerativecolitisadoubleblindrandomizedstudy