Cargando…
Variance heterogeneity analysis for detection of potentially interacting genetic loci: method and its limitations
BACKGROUND: Presence of interaction between a genotype and certain factor in determination of a trait's value, it is expected that the trait's variance is increased in the group of subjects having this genotype. Thus, test of heterogeneity of variances can be used as a test to screen for p...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2973850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20942902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-92 |
_version_ | 1782190845645029376 |
---|---|
author | Struchalin, Maksim V Dehghan, Abbas Witteman, Jacqueline CM van Duijn, Cornelia Aulchenko, Yurii S |
author_facet | Struchalin, Maksim V Dehghan, Abbas Witteman, Jacqueline CM van Duijn, Cornelia Aulchenko, Yurii S |
author_sort | Struchalin, Maksim V |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Presence of interaction between a genotype and certain factor in determination of a trait's value, it is expected that the trait's variance is increased in the group of subjects having this genotype. Thus, test of heterogeneity of variances can be used as a test to screen for potentially interacting single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). In this work, we evaluated statistical properties of variance heterogeneity analysis in respect to the detection of potentially interacting SNPs in a case when an interaction variable is unknown. RESULTS: Through simulations, we investigated type I error for Bartlett's test, Bartlett's test with prior rank transformation of a trait to normality, and Levene's test for different genetic models. Additionally, we derived an analytical expression for power estimation. We showed that Bartlett's test has acceptable type I error in the case of trait following a normal distribution, whereas Levene's test kept nominal Type I error under all scenarios investigated. For the power of variance homogeneity test, we showed (as opposed to the power of direct test which uses information about known interacting factor) that, given the same interaction effect, the power can vary widely depending on the non-estimable direct effect of the unobserved interacting variable. Thus, for a given interaction effect, only very wide limits of power of the variance homogeneity test can be estimated. Also we applied Levene's approach to test genome-wide homogeneity of variances of the C-reactive protein in the Rotterdam Study population (n = 5959). In this analysis, we replicate previous results of Pare and colleagues (2010) for the SNP rs12753193 (n = 21, 799). CONCLUSIONS: Screening for differences in variances among genotypes of a SNP is a promising approach as a number of biologically interesting models may lead to the heterogeneity of variances. However, it should be kept in mind that the absence of variance heterogeneity for a SNP can not be interpreted as the absence of involvement of the SNP in the interaction network. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2973850 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29738502010-11-05 Variance heterogeneity analysis for detection of potentially interacting genetic loci: method and its limitations Struchalin, Maksim V Dehghan, Abbas Witteman, Jacqueline CM van Duijn, Cornelia Aulchenko, Yurii S BMC Genet Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Presence of interaction between a genotype and certain factor in determination of a trait's value, it is expected that the trait's variance is increased in the group of subjects having this genotype. Thus, test of heterogeneity of variances can be used as a test to screen for potentially interacting single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). In this work, we evaluated statistical properties of variance heterogeneity analysis in respect to the detection of potentially interacting SNPs in a case when an interaction variable is unknown. RESULTS: Through simulations, we investigated type I error for Bartlett's test, Bartlett's test with prior rank transformation of a trait to normality, and Levene's test for different genetic models. Additionally, we derived an analytical expression for power estimation. We showed that Bartlett's test has acceptable type I error in the case of trait following a normal distribution, whereas Levene's test kept nominal Type I error under all scenarios investigated. For the power of variance homogeneity test, we showed (as opposed to the power of direct test which uses information about known interacting factor) that, given the same interaction effect, the power can vary widely depending on the non-estimable direct effect of the unobserved interacting variable. Thus, for a given interaction effect, only very wide limits of power of the variance homogeneity test can be estimated. Also we applied Levene's approach to test genome-wide homogeneity of variances of the C-reactive protein in the Rotterdam Study population (n = 5959). In this analysis, we replicate previous results of Pare and colleagues (2010) for the SNP rs12753193 (n = 21, 799). CONCLUSIONS: Screening for differences in variances among genotypes of a SNP is a promising approach as a number of biologically interesting models may lead to the heterogeneity of variances. However, it should be kept in mind that the absence of variance heterogeneity for a SNP can not be interpreted as the absence of involvement of the SNP in the interaction network. BioMed Central 2010-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2973850/ /pubmed/20942902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-92 Text en Copyright ©2010 Struchalin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Struchalin, Maksim V Dehghan, Abbas Witteman, Jacqueline CM van Duijn, Cornelia Aulchenko, Yurii S Variance heterogeneity analysis for detection of potentially interacting genetic loci: method and its limitations |
title | Variance heterogeneity analysis for detection of potentially interacting genetic loci: method and its limitations |
title_full | Variance heterogeneity analysis for detection of potentially interacting genetic loci: method and its limitations |
title_fullStr | Variance heterogeneity analysis for detection of potentially interacting genetic loci: method and its limitations |
title_full_unstemmed | Variance heterogeneity analysis for detection of potentially interacting genetic loci: method and its limitations |
title_short | Variance heterogeneity analysis for detection of potentially interacting genetic loci: method and its limitations |
title_sort | variance heterogeneity analysis for detection of potentially interacting genetic loci: method and its limitations |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2973850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20942902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-92 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT struchalinmaksimv varianceheterogeneityanalysisfordetectionofpotentiallyinteractinggeneticlocimethodanditslimitations AT dehghanabbas varianceheterogeneityanalysisfordetectionofpotentiallyinteractinggeneticlocimethodanditslimitations AT wittemanjacquelinecm varianceheterogeneityanalysisfordetectionofpotentiallyinteractinggeneticlocimethodanditslimitations AT vanduijncornelia varianceheterogeneityanalysisfordetectionofpotentiallyinteractinggeneticlocimethodanditslimitations AT aulchenkoyuriis varianceheterogeneityanalysisfordetectionofpotentiallyinteractinggeneticlocimethodanditslimitations |