Cargando…

Variance heterogeneity analysis for detection of potentially interacting genetic loci: method and its limitations

BACKGROUND: Presence of interaction between a genotype and certain factor in determination of a trait's value, it is expected that the trait's variance is increased in the group of subjects having this genotype. Thus, test of heterogeneity of variances can be used as a test to screen for p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Struchalin, Maksim V, Dehghan, Abbas, Witteman, Jacqueline CM, van Duijn, Cornelia, Aulchenko, Yurii S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2973850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20942902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-92
_version_ 1782190845645029376
author Struchalin, Maksim V
Dehghan, Abbas
Witteman, Jacqueline CM
van Duijn, Cornelia
Aulchenko, Yurii S
author_facet Struchalin, Maksim V
Dehghan, Abbas
Witteman, Jacqueline CM
van Duijn, Cornelia
Aulchenko, Yurii S
author_sort Struchalin, Maksim V
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Presence of interaction between a genotype and certain factor in determination of a trait's value, it is expected that the trait's variance is increased in the group of subjects having this genotype. Thus, test of heterogeneity of variances can be used as a test to screen for potentially interacting single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). In this work, we evaluated statistical properties of variance heterogeneity analysis in respect to the detection of potentially interacting SNPs in a case when an interaction variable is unknown. RESULTS: Through simulations, we investigated type I error for Bartlett's test, Bartlett's test with prior rank transformation of a trait to normality, and Levene's test for different genetic models. Additionally, we derived an analytical expression for power estimation. We showed that Bartlett's test has acceptable type I error in the case of trait following a normal distribution, whereas Levene's test kept nominal Type I error under all scenarios investigated. For the power of variance homogeneity test, we showed (as opposed to the power of direct test which uses information about known interacting factor) that, given the same interaction effect, the power can vary widely depending on the non-estimable direct effect of the unobserved interacting variable. Thus, for a given interaction effect, only very wide limits of power of the variance homogeneity test can be estimated. Also we applied Levene's approach to test genome-wide homogeneity of variances of the C-reactive protein in the Rotterdam Study population (n = 5959). In this analysis, we replicate previous results of Pare and colleagues (2010) for the SNP rs12753193 (n = 21, 799). CONCLUSIONS: Screening for differences in variances among genotypes of a SNP is a promising approach as a number of biologically interesting models may lead to the heterogeneity of variances. However, it should be kept in mind that the absence of variance heterogeneity for a SNP can not be interpreted as the absence of involvement of the SNP in the interaction network.
format Text
id pubmed-2973850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29738502010-11-05 Variance heterogeneity analysis for detection of potentially interacting genetic loci: method and its limitations Struchalin, Maksim V Dehghan, Abbas Witteman, Jacqueline CM van Duijn, Cornelia Aulchenko, Yurii S BMC Genet Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Presence of interaction between a genotype and certain factor in determination of a trait's value, it is expected that the trait's variance is increased in the group of subjects having this genotype. Thus, test of heterogeneity of variances can be used as a test to screen for potentially interacting single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). In this work, we evaluated statistical properties of variance heterogeneity analysis in respect to the detection of potentially interacting SNPs in a case when an interaction variable is unknown. RESULTS: Through simulations, we investigated type I error for Bartlett's test, Bartlett's test with prior rank transformation of a trait to normality, and Levene's test for different genetic models. Additionally, we derived an analytical expression for power estimation. We showed that Bartlett's test has acceptable type I error in the case of trait following a normal distribution, whereas Levene's test kept nominal Type I error under all scenarios investigated. For the power of variance homogeneity test, we showed (as opposed to the power of direct test which uses information about known interacting factor) that, given the same interaction effect, the power can vary widely depending on the non-estimable direct effect of the unobserved interacting variable. Thus, for a given interaction effect, only very wide limits of power of the variance homogeneity test can be estimated. Also we applied Levene's approach to test genome-wide homogeneity of variances of the C-reactive protein in the Rotterdam Study population (n = 5959). In this analysis, we replicate previous results of Pare and colleagues (2010) for the SNP rs12753193 (n = 21, 799). CONCLUSIONS: Screening for differences in variances among genotypes of a SNP is a promising approach as a number of biologically interesting models may lead to the heterogeneity of variances. However, it should be kept in mind that the absence of variance heterogeneity for a SNP can not be interpreted as the absence of involvement of the SNP in the interaction network. BioMed Central 2010-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2973850/ /pubmed/20942902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-92 Text en Copyright ©2010 Struchalin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Struchalin, Maksim V
Dehghan, Abbas
Witteman, Jacqueline CM
van Duijn, Cornelia
Aulchenko, Yurii S
Variance heterogeneity analysis for detection of potentially interacting genetic loci: method and its limitations
title Variance heterogeneity analysis for detection of potentially interacting genetic loci: method and its limitations
title_full Variance heterogeneity analysis for detection of potentially interacting genetic loci: method and its limitations
title_fullStr Variance heterogeneity analysis for detection of potentially interacting genetic loci: method and its limitations
title_full_unstemmed Variance heterogeneity analysis for detection of potentially interacting genetic loci: method and its limitations
title_short Variance heterogeneity analysis for detection of potentially interacting genetic loci: method and its limitations
title_sort variance heterogeneity analysis for detection of potentially interacting genetic loci: method and its limitations
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2973850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20942902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-92
work_keys_str_mv AT struchalinmaksimv varianceheterogeneityanalysisfordetectionofpotentiallyinteractinggeneticlocimethodanditslimitations
AT dehghanabbas varianceheterogeneityanalysisfordetectionofpotentiallyinteractinggeneticlocimethodanditslimitations
AT wittemanjacquelinecm varianceheterogeneityanalysisfordetectionofpotentiallyinteractinggeneticlocimethodanditslimitations
AT vanduijncornelia varianceheterogeneityanalysisfordetectionofpotentiallyinteractinggeneticlocimethodanditslimitations
AT aulchenkoyuriis varianceheterogeneityanalysisfordetectionofpotentiallyinteractinggeneticlocimethodanditslimitations