Cargando…

On the Role of the Striatum in Response Inhibition

BACKGROUND: Stopping a manual response requires suppression of the primary motor cortex (M1) and has been linked to activation of the striatum. Here, we test three hypotheses regarding the role of the striatum in stopping: striatum activation during successful stopping may reflect suppression of M1,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zandbelt, Bram B., Vink, Matthijs
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2973972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21079814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013848
_version_ 1782190857155248128
author Zandbelt, Bram B.
Vink, Matthijs
author_facet Zandbelt, Bram B.
Vink, Matthijs
author_sort Zandbelt, Bram B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stopping a manual response requires suppression of the primary motor cortex (M1) and has been linked to activation of the striatum. Here, we test three hypotheses regarding the role of the striatum in stopping: striatum activation during successful stopping may reflect suppression of M1, anticipation of a stop-signal occurring, or a slower response build-up. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Twenty-four healthy volunteers underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while performing a stop-signal paradigm, in which anticipation of stopping was manipulated using a visual cue indicating stop-signal probability, with their right hand. We observed activation of the striatum and deactivation of left M1 during successful versus unsuccessful stopping. In addition, striatum activation was proportional to the degree of left M1 deactivation during successful stopping, implicating the striatum in response suppression. Furthermore, striatum activation increased as a function of stop-signal probability and was to linked to activation in the supplementary motor complex (SMC) and right inferior frontal cortex (rIFC) during successful stopping, suggesting a role in anticipation of stopping. Finally, trial-to-trial variations in response time did not affect striatum activation. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The results identify the striatum as a critical node in the neural network associated with stopping motor responses. As striatum activation was related to both suppression of M1 and anticipation of a stop-signal occurring, these findings suggest that the striatum is involved in proactive inhibitory control over M1, most likely in interaction with SMC and rIFC.
format Text
id pubmed-2973972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29739722010-11-15 On the Role of the Striatum in Response Inhibition Zandbelt, Bram B. Vink, Matthijs PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Stopping a manual response requires suppression of the primary motor cortex (M1) and has been linked to activation of the striatum. Here, we test three hypotheses regarding the role of the striatum in stopping: striatum activation during successful stopping may reflect suppression of M1, anticipation of a stop-signal occurring, or a slower response build-up. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Twenty-four healthy volunteers underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while performing a stop-signal paradigm, in which anticipation of stopping was manipulated using a visual cue indicating stop-signal probability, with their right hand. We observed activation of the striatum and deactivation of left M1 during successful versus unsuccessful stopping. In addition, striatum activation was proportional to the degree of left M1 deactivation during successful stopping, implicating the striatum in response suppression. Furthermore, striatum activation increased as a function of stop-signal probability and was to linked to activation in the supplementary motor complex (SMC) and right inferior frontal cortex (rIFC) during successful stopping, suggesting a role in anticipation of stopping. Finally, trial-to-trial variations in response time did not affect striatum activation. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The results identify the striatum as a critical node in the neural network associated with stopping motor responses. As striatum activation was related to both suppression of M1 and anticipation of a stop-signal occurring, these findings suggest that the striatum is involved in proactive inhibitory control over M1, most likely in interaction with SMC and rIFC. Public Library of Science 2010-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2973972/ /pubmed/21079814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013848 Text en Zandbelt, Vink. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zandbelt, Bram B.
Vink, Matthijs
On the Role of the Striatum in Response Inhibition
title On the Role of the Striatum in Response Inhibition
title_full On the Role of the Striatum in Response Inhibition
title_fullStr On the Role of the Striatum in Response Inhibition
title_full_unstemmed On the Role of the Striatum in Response Inhibition
title_short On the Role of the Striatum in Response Inhibition
title_sort on the role of the striatum in response inhibition
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2973972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21079814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013848
work_keys_str_mv AT zandbeltbramb ontheroleofthestriatuminresponseinhibition
AT vinkmatthijs ontheroleofthestriatuminresponseinhibition