Cargando…

Seton drainage prior to transanal advancement flap repair: useful or not?

INTRODUCTION: Transanal advancement flap repair (TAFR) provides a useful tool in the treatment of high transsphincteric fistulas. Recent studies indicate that TAFR fails in one out of three patients. Until now, no definite predictive factor for failure has been identified. Although some authors have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mitalas, Litza E., van Wijk, Jan J., Gosselink, Martijn P., Doornebosch, Pascal, Zimmerman, David D. E., Schouten, W. Rudolph
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2974209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20645104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-0993-7
_version_ 1782190869543124992
author Mitalas, Litza E.
van Wijk, Jan J.
Gosselink, Martijn P.
Doornebosch, Pascal
Zimmerman, David D. E.
Schouten, W. Rudolph
author_facet Mitalas, Litza E.
van Wijk, Jan J.
Gosselink, Martijn P.
Doornebosch, Pascal
Zimmerman, David D. E.
Schouten, W. Rudolph
author_sort Mitalas, Litza E.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Transanal advancement flap repair (TAFR) provides a useful tool in the treatment of high transsphincteric fistulas. Recent studies indicate that TAFR fails in one out of three patients. Until now, no definite predictive factor for failure has been identified. Although some authors have reported that preoperative seton drainage might improve the outcome of TAFR, this could not be confirmed by others. We conducted the present study to assess the influence of preoperative seton drainage on the outcome of TAFR in a relatively large series. METHODS: Between December 1992 and June 2008, a consecutive series of 278 patients [M/F = 179:99, median age 46 years (range, 19–73 years)] with cryptoglandular, transsphincteric fistula, passing through the upper or middle third of the external anal sphincter underwent TAFR. Patients were recruited from the colorectal units of two university hospitals (Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, n = 211; and Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, n = 67). Baseline characteristics did not differ between the two clinics. Sixty-eight of these patients underwent preoperative seton drainage for at least 2 months and until the day of the flap repair. RESULTS: Median healing time was 2.2 months. In patients without preoperative seton drainage, the healing rate was 63%, whereas the healing rate was 67% in patients who underwent preoperative seton drainage. This difference was not statistically significant. No differences in healing rates were found between the series from Leiden and Rotterdam. CONCLUSION: Preoperative seton drainage does not improve the outcome of TAFR.
format Text
id pubmed-2974209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29742092010-11-29 Seton drainage prior to transanal advancement flap repair: useful or not? Mitalas, Litza E. van Wijk, Jan J. Gosselink, Martijn P. Doornebosch, Pascal Zimmerman, David D. E. Schouten, W. Rudolph Int J Colorectal Dis Original Article INTRODUCTION: Transanal advancement flap repair (TAFR) provides a useful tool in the treatment of high transsphincteric fistulas. Recent studies indicate that TAFR fails in one out of three patients. Until now, no definite predictive factor for failure has been identified. Although some authors have reported that preoperative seton drainage might improve the outcome of TAFR, this could not be confirmed by others. We conducted the present study to assess the influence of preoperative seton drainage on the outcome of TAFR in a relatively large series. METHODS: Between December 1992 and June 2008, a consecutive series of 278 patients [M/F = 179:99, median age 46 years (range, 19–73 years)] with cryptoglandular, transsphincteric fistula, passing through the upper or middle third of the external anal sphincter underwent TAFR. Patients were recruited from the colorectal units of two university hospitals (Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, n = 211; and Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, n = 67). Baseline characteristics did not differ between the two clinics. Sixty-eight of these patients underwent preoperative seton drainage for at least 2 months and until the day of the flap repair. RESULTS: Median healing time was 2.2 months. In patients without preoperative seton drainage, the healing rate was 63%, whereas the healing rate was 67% in patients who underwent preoperative seton drainage. This difference was not statistically significant. No differences in healing rates were found between the series from Leiden and Rotterdam. CONCLUSION: Preoperative seton drainage does not improve the outcome of TAFR. Springer-Verlag 2010-07-20 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2974209/ /pubmed/20645104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-0993-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mitalas, Litza E.
van Wijk, Jan J.
Gosselink, Martijn P.
Doornebosch, Pascal
Zimmerman, David D. E.
Schouten, W. Rudolph
Seton drainage prior to transanal advancement flap repair: useful or not?
title Seton drainage prior to transanal advancement flap repair: useful or not?
title_full Seton drainage prior to transanal advancement flap repair: useful or not?
title_fullStr Seton drainage prior to transanal advancement flap repair: useful or not?
title_full_unstemmed Seton drainage prior to transanal advancement flap repair: useful or not?
title_short Seton drainage prior to transanal advancement flap repair: useful or not?
title_sort seton drainage prior to transanal advancement flap repair: useful or not?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2974209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20645104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-0993-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mitalaslitzae setondrainagepriortotransanaladvancementflaprepairusefulornot
AT vanwijkjanj setondrainagepriortotransanaladvancementflaprepairusefulornot
AT gosselinkmartijnp setondrainagepriortotransanaladvancementflaprepairusefulornot
AT doorneboschpascal setondrainagepriortotransanaladvancementflaprepairusefulornot
AT zimmermandavidde setondrainagepriortotransanaladvancementflaprepairusefulornot
AT schoutenwrudolph setondrainagepriortotransanaladvancementflaprepairusefulornot