Cargando…

Cemented Hip Designs are a Reasonable Option in Young Patients

BACKGROUND: Young patients with degenerative cartilage disease of the hip remain a challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. Different treatment options are available of which uncemented hips are the most popular owing to long-term concerns about cemented implants. As an alternative, we have used a cem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Busch, Vincent, Klarenbeek, Rik, Slooff, Tom, Schreurs, B. Willem, Gardeniers, Jean
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2974862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20405346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1355-z
_version_ 1782190909728751616
author Busch, Vincent
Klarenbeek, Rik
Slooff, Tom
Schreurs, B. Willem
Gardeniers, Jean
author_facet Busch, Vincent
Klarenbeek, Rik
Slooff, Tom
Schreurs, B. Willem
Gardeniers, Jean
author_sort Busch, Vincent
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Young patients with degenerative cartilage disease of the hip remain a challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. Different treatment options are available of which uncemented hips are the most popular owing to long-term concerns about cemented implants. As an alternative, we have used a cemented hip design in combination with bone impaction grafting in patients with acetabular defects. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore determined the survival rates and radiological failures of cemented THA in patients younger than 30 years and reported clinical scores, complications and current state of the revised THAs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all 48 patients (69 hips) younger than 30 years at the time of surgery who had a primary cemented THA performed between 1988 and 2004. Acetabular defects were reconstructed using bone impaction grafting in 29 hips. Mean age at surgery was 24.6 years (range, 16–29 years). Revisions were documented, radiographs were analyzed, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine survival for different end points. No patient was lost to followup, three patients (four hips) had died. Minimum followup was 2 years (mean, 8.4 years; range, 2–18 years). RESULTS: Eight hips were revised (three for infection and five for aseptic loosening) and one hip dislocated for which open reduction was necessary. One additional cup was considered a radiographic failure. The 10-year survival was 83% (95% confidence interval, 69%–92%) with revision for any reason as the end point and 90% (95% confidence interval, 77%–96%) with revision for aseptic loosening. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high survival rate of these cemented THA in young patients. In young patients with acetabular bone defects we recommend reconstruction using cemented implants with bone impaction grafting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
format Text
id pubmed-2974862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29748622010-11-29 Cemented Hip Designs are a Reasonable Option in Young Patients Busch, Vincent Klarenbeek, Rik Slooff, Tom Schreurs, B. Willem Gardeniers, Jean Clin Orthop Relat Res Symposium: Papers Presented at the 2009 Closed Meeting of the International Hip Society BACKGROUND: Young patients with degenerative cartilage disease of the hip remain a challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. Different treatment options are available of which uncemented hips are the most popular owing to long-term concerns about cemented implants. As an alternative, we have used a cemented hip design in combination with bone impaction grafting in patients with acetabular defects. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore determined the survival rates and radiological failures of cemented THA in patients younger than 30 years and reported clinical scores, complications and current state of the revised THAs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all 48 patients (69 hips) younger than 30 years at the time of surgery who had a primary cemented THA performed between 1988 and 2004. Acetabular defects were reconstructed using bone impaction grafting in 29 hips. Mean age at surgery was 24.6 years (range, 16–29 years). Revisions were documented, radiographs were analyzed, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine survival for different end points. No patient was lost to followup, three patients (four hips) had died. Minimum followup was 2 years (mean, 8.4 years; range, 2–18 years). RESULTS: Eight hips were revised (three for infection and five for aseptic loosening) and one hip dislocated for which open reduction was necessary. One additional cup was considered a radiographic failure. The 10-year survival was 83% (95% confidence interval, 69%–92%) with revision for any reason as the end point and 90% (95% confidence interval, 77%–96%) with revision for aseptic loosening. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high survival rate of these cemented THA in young patients. In young patients with acetabular bone defects we recommend reconstruction using cemented implants with bone impaction grafting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Springer-Verlag 2010-04-20 2010-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2974862/ /pubmed/20405346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1355-z Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Symposium: Papers Presented at the 2009 Closed Meeting of the International Hip Society
Busch, Vincent
Klarenbeek, Rik
Slooff, Tom
Schreurs, B. Willem
Gardeniers, Jean
Cemented Hip Designs are a Reasonable Option in Young Patients
title Cemented Hip Designs are a Reasonable Option in Young Patients
title_full Cemented Hip Designs are a Reasonable Option in Young Patients
title_fullStr Cemented Hip Designs are a Reasonable Option in Young Patients
title_full_unstemmed Cemented Hip Designs are a Reasonable Option in Young Patients
title_short Cemented Hip Designs are a Reasonable Option in Young Patients
title_sort cemented hip designs are a reasonable option in young patients
topic Symposium: Papers Presented at the 2009 Closed Meeting of the International Hip Society
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2974862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20405346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1355-z
work_keys_str_mv AT buschvincent cementedhipdesignsareareasonableoptioninyoungpatients
AT klarenbeekrik cementedhipdesignsareareasonableoptioninyoungpatients
AT sloofftom cementedhipdesignsareareasonableoptioninyoungpatients
AT schreursbwillem cementedhipdesignsareareasonableoptioninyoungpatients
AT gardeniersjean cementedhipdesignsareareasonableoptioninyoungpatients