Cargando…
Pitch Comparisons between Electrical Stimulation of a Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimuli Presented to a Normal-hearing Contralateral Ear
Four cochlear implant users, having normal hearing in the unimplanted ear, compared the pitches of electrical and acoustic stimuli presented to the two ears. Comparisons were between 1,031-pps pulse trains and pure tones or between 12 and 25-pps electric pulse trains and bandpass-filtered acoustic p...
Autores principales: | Carlyon, Robert P., Macherey, Olivier, Frijns, Johan H. M., Axon, Patrick R., Kalkman, Randy K., Boyle, Patrick, Baguley, David M., Briggs, John, Deeks, John M., Briaire, Jeroen J., Barreau, Xavier, Dauman, René |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2975889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20526727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-010-0222-7 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Extending the Limits of Place and Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users
por: Macherey, Olivier, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Pitch Discrimination: An Independent Factor in Cochlear Implant Performance Outcomes
por: Kenway, Bruno, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulses
por: Carlyon, Robert P., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
The Effect of Phantom Stimulation and Pseudomonophasic Pulse Shapes on Pitch Perception by Cochlear Implant Listeners
por: Lamping, Wiebke, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Rate discrimination, gap detection and ranking of temporal pitch in cochlear implant users
por: Cosentino, Stefano, et al.
Publicado: (2016)