Cargando…

Single maintenance and reliever therapy (SMART) of asthma: a critical appraisal

The use of a combination inhaler containing budesonide and formoterol as both maintenance and quick relief therapy (SMART) has been recommended as an improved method of using inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β agonist (ICS/LABA) therapy. Published double-blind trials show that budesonide/formotero...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chapman, Kenneth R, Barnes, Neil C, Greening, Andrew P, Jones, Paul W, Pedersen, S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2975956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20581409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.2009.128504
_version_ 1782190969208176640
author Chapman, Kenneth R
Barnes, Neil C
Greening, Andrew P
Jones, Paul W
Pedersen, S
author_facet Chapman, Kenneth R
Barnes, Neil C
Greening, Andrew P
Jones, Paul W
Pedersen, S
author_sort Chapman, Kenneth R
collection PubMed
description The use of a combination inhaler containing budesonide and formoterol as both maintenance and quick relief therapy (SMART) has been recommended as an improved method of using inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β agonist (ICS/LABA) therapy. Published double-blind trials show that budesonide/formoterol therapy delivered in SMART fashion achieves better asthma outcomes than budesonide monotherapy or lower doses of budesonide/formoterol therapy delivered in constant dosage. Attempts to compare budesonide/formoterol SMART therapy with regular combination ICS/LABA dosing using other compounds have been confounded by a lack of blinding and unspecified dose adjustment strategies. The asthma control outcomes in SMART-treated patients are poor; it has been reported that only 17.1% of SMART-treated patients are controlled. In seven trials of 6–12 months duration, patients using SMART have used quick reliever daily (weighted average 0.92 inhalations/day), have awakened with asthma symptoms once every 7–10 days (weighted average 11.5% of nights), have suffered asthma symptoms more than half of days (weighted average 54.0% of days) and have had a severe exacerbation rate of one in five patients per year (weighted average 0.22 severe exacerbations/patient/year). These poor outcomes may reflect the recruitment of a skewed patient population. Although improvement from baseline has been attributed to these patients receiving additional ICS therapy at pivotal times, electronic monitoring has not been used to test this hypothesis nor the equally plausible hypothesis that patients who are non-compliant with maintenance medication have used budesonide/formoterol as needed for self-treatment of exacerbations. Although the long-term consequences of SMART therapy have not been studied, its use over 1 year has been associated with significant increases in sputum and biopsy eosinophilia. At present, there is no evidence that better asthma treatment outcomes can be obtained by moment-to-moment symptom-driven use of ICS/LABA therapy than conventional physician-monitored and adjusted ICS/LABA therapy.
format Text
id pubmed-2975956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29759562010-11-26 Single maintenance and reliever therapy (SMART) of asthma: a critical appraisal Chapman, Kenneth R Barnes, Neil C Greening, Andrew P Jones, Paul W Pedersen, S Thorax Review The use of a combination inhaler containing budesonide and formoterol as both maintenance and quick relief therapy (SMART) has been recommended as an improved method of using inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β agonist (ICS/LABA) therapy. Published double-blind trials show that budesonide/formoterol therapy delivered in SMART fashion achieves better asthma outcomes than budesonide monotherapy or lower doses of budesonide/formoterol therapy delivered in constant dosage. Attempts to compare budesonide/formoterol SMART therapy with regular combination ICS/LABA dosing using other compounds have been confounded by a lack of blinding and unspecified dose adjustment strategies. The asthma control outcomes in SMART-treated patients are poor; it has been reported that only 17.1% of SMART-treated patients are controlled. In seven trials of 6–12 months duration, patients using SMART have used quick reliever daily (weighted average 0.92 inhalations/day), have awakened with asthma symptoms once every 7–10 days (weighted average 11.5% of nights), have suffered asthma symptoms more than half of days (weighted average 54.0% of days) and have had a severe exacerbation rate of one in five patients per year (weighted average 0.22 severe exacerbations/patient/year). These poor outcomes may reflect the recruitment of a skewed patient population. Although improvement from baseline has been attributed to these patients receiving additional ICS therapy at pivotal times, electronic monitoring has not been used to test this hypothesis nor the equally plausible hypothesis that patients who are non-compliant with maintenance medication have used budesonide/formoterol as needed for self-treatment of exacerbations. Although the long-term consequences of SMART therapy have not been studied, its use over 1 year has been associated with significant increases in sputum and biopsy eosinophilia. At present, there is no evidence that better asthma treatment outcomes can be obtained by moment-to-moment symptom-driven use of ICS/LABA therapy than conventional physician-monitored and adjusted ICS/LABA therapy. BMJ Group 2010-06-27 2010-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2975956/ /pubmed/20581409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.2009.128504 Text en © 2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Review
Chapman, Kenneth R
Barnes, Neil C
Greening, Andrew P
Jones, Paul W
Pedersen, S
Single maintenance and reliever therapy (SMART) of asthma: a critical appraisal
title Single maintenance and reliever therapy (SMART) of asthma: a critical appraisal
title_full Single maintenance and reliever therapy (SMART) of asthma: a critical appraisal
title_fullStr Single maintenance and reliever therapy (SMART) of asthma: a critical appraisal
title_full_unstemmed Single maintenance and reliever therapy (SMART) of asthma: a critical appraisal
title_short Single maintenance and reliever therapy (SMART) of asthma: a critical appraisal
title_sort single maintenance and reliever therapy (smart) of asthma: a critical appraisal
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2975956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20581409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.2009.128504
work_keys_str_mv AT chapmankennethr singlemaintenanceandrelievertherapysmartofasthmaacriticalappraisal
AT barnesneilc singlemaintenanceandrelievertherapysmartofasthmaacriticalappraisal
AT greeningandrewp singlemaintenanceandrelievertherapysmartofasthmaacriticalappraisal
AT jonespaulw singlemaintenanceandrelievertherapysmartofasthmaacriticalappraisal
AT pedersens singlemaintenanceandrelievertherapysmartofasthmaacriticalappraisal