Cargando…

Current clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome are not sensitive enough to identify MSH6 mutation carriers

BACKGROUND: Reported prevalence, penetrance and expression of deleterious mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2, may reflect differences in the clinical criteria used to select families for DNA testing. The authors have previously reported that clinical criteria are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sjursen, Wenche, Haukanes, Bjørn Ivar, Grindedal, Eli Marie, Aarset, Harald, Stormorken, Astrid, Engebretsen, Lars F, Jonsrud, Christoffer, Bjørnevoll, Inga, Andresen, Per Arne, Ariansen, Sarah, Lavik, Liss Anne S, Gilde, Bodil, Bowitz-Lothe, Inger Marie, Mæhle, Lovise, Møller, Pål
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2976029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20587412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2010.077677
_version_ 1782190975024627712
author Sjursen, Wenche
Haukanes, Bjørn Ivar
Grindedal, Eli Marie
Aarset, Harald
Stormorken, Astrid
Engebretsen, Lars F
Jonsrud, Christoffer
Bjørnevoll, Inga
Andresen, Per Arne
Ariansen, Sarah
Lavik, Liss Anne S
Gilde, Bodil
Bowitz-Lothe, Inger Marie
Mæhle, Lovise
Møller, Pål
author_facet Sjursen, Wenche
Haukanes, Bjørn Ivar
Grindedal, Eli Marie
Aarset, Harald
Stormorken, Astrid
Engebretsen, Lars F
Jonsrud, Christoffer
Bjørnevoll, Inga
Andresen, Per Arne
Ariansen, Sarah
Lavik, Liss Anne S
Gilde, Bodil
Bowitz-Lothe, Inger Marie
Mæhle, Lovise
Møller, Pål
author_sort Sjursen, Wenche
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reported prevalence, penetrance and expression of deleterious mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2, may reflect differences in the clinical criteria used to select families for DNA testing. The authors have previously reported that clinical criteria are not sensitive enough to identify MMR mutation carriers among incident colorectal cancer cases. OBJECTIVE: To describe the sensitivity of the criteria when applied to families with a demonstrated MMR mutation. METHODS: Families with an aggregation of colorectal cancers were examined for deleterious MMR mutations according to the Mallorca guidelines. All families with a detected MMR mutation as of November 2009 were reclassified according to the Amsterdam and Bethesda criteria. RESULTS: Sixty-nine different DNA variants were identified in a total of 129 families. The original Amsterdam clinical criteria were met by 38%, 12%, 78% and 25% of families with mutations in MSH2, MSH6, MLH1 and PMS2, respectively. Corresponding numbers for the revised Amsterdam criteria were 62%, 48%, 87% and 38%. Similarly, each of the four clinical Bethesda criteria had low sensitivity for identifying MSH6 or PMS2 mutations. CONCLUSION: Amsterdam criteria and each of the Bethesda criteria were inadequate for identifying MSH6 mutation-carrying kindreds. MSH6 mutations may be more common than currently assumed, and the penetrance/expression of MSH6 mutations, as derived from families meeting current clinical criteria, may be misleading. To increase detection rate of MMR mutation carriers, all cancers in the Lynch syndrome tumour spectrum should be subjected to immunohistochemical analysis and/or analysis for microsatellite instability.
format Text
id pubmed-2976029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29760292010-11-26 Current clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome are not sensitive enough to identify MSH6 mutation carriers Sjursen, Wenche Haukanes, Bjørn Ivar Grindedal, Eli Marie Aarset, Harald Stormorken, Astrid Engebretsen, Lars F Jonsrud, Christoffer Bjørnevoll, Inga Andresen, Per Arne Ariansen, Sarah Lavik, Liss Anne S Gilde, Bodil Bowitz-Lothe, Inger Marie Mæhle, Lovise Møller, Pål J Med Genet Original Article BACKGROUND: Reported prevalence, penetrance and expression of deleterious mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2, may reflect differences in the clinical criteria used to select families for DNA testing. The authors have previously reported that clinical criteria are not sensitive enough to identify MMR mutation carriers among incident colorectal cancer cases. OBJECTIVE: To describe the sensitivity of the criteria when applied to families with a demonstrated MMR mutation. METHODS: Families with an aggregation of colorectal cancers were examined for deleterious MMR mutations according to the Mallorca guidelines. All families with a detected MMR mutation as of November 2009 were reclassified according to the Amsterdam and Bethesda criteria. RESULTS: Sixty-nine different DNA variants were identified in a total of 129 families. The original Amsterdam clinical criteria were met by 38%, 12%, 78% and 25% of families with mutations in MSH2, MSH6, MLH1 and PMS2, respectively. Corresponding numbers for the revised Amsterdam criteria were 62%, 48%, 87% and 38%. Similarly, each of the four clinical Bethesda criteria had low sensitivity for identifying MSH6 or PMS2 mutations. CONCLUSION: Amsterdam criteria and each of the Bethesda criteria were inadequate for identifying MSH6 mutation-carrying kindreds. MSH6 mutations may be more common than currently assumed, and the penetrance/expression of MSH6 mutations, as derived from families meeting current clinical criteria, may be misleading. To increase detection rate of MMR mutation carriers, all cancers in the Lynch syndrome tumour spectrum should be subjected to immunohistochemical analysis and/or analysis for microsatellite instability. BMJ Group 2010-06-28 2010-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2976029/ /pubmed/20587412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2010.077677 Text en © 2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sjursen, Wenche
Haukanes, Bjørn Ivar
Grindedal, Eli Marie
Aarset, Harald
Stormorken, Astrid
Engebretsen, Lars F
Jonsrud, Christoffer
Bjørnevoll, Inga
Andresen, Per Arne
Ariansen, Sarah
Lavik, Liss Anne S
Gilde, Bodil
Bowitz-Lothe, Inger Marie
Mæhle, Lovise
Møller, Pål
Current clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome are not sensitive enough to identify MSH6 mutation carriers
title Current clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome are not sensitive enough to identify MSH6 mutation carriers
title_full Current clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome are not sensitive enough to identify MSH6 mutation carriers
title_fullStr Current clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome are not sensitive enough to identify MSH6 mutation carriers
title_full_unstemmed Current clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome are not sensitive enough to identify MSH6 mutation carriers
title_short Current clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome are not sensitive enough to identify MSH6 mutation carriers
title_sort current clinical criteria for lynch syndrome are not sensitive enough to identify msh6 mutation carriers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2976029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20587412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2010.077677
work_keys_str_mv AT sjursenwenche currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers
AT haukanesbjørnivar currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers
AT grindedalelimarie currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers
AT aarsetharald currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers
AT stormorkenastrid currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers
AT engebretsenlarsf currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers
AT jonsrudchristoffer currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers
AT bjørnevollinga currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers
AT andresenperarne currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers
AT ariansensarah currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers
AT laviklissannes currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers
AT gildebodil currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers
AT bowitzlotheingermarie currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers
AT mæhlelovise currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers
AT møllerpal currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers