Cargando…
Current clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome are not sensitive enough to identify MSH6 mutation carriers
BACKGROUND: Reported prevalence, penetrance and expression of deleterious mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2, may reflect differences in the clinical criteria used to select families for DNA testing. The authors have previously reported that clinical criteria are...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Group
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2976029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20587412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2010.077677 |
_version_ | 1782190975024627712 |
---|---|
author | Sjursen, Wenche Haukanes, Bjørn Ivar Grindedal, Eli Marie Aarset, Harald Stormorken, Astrid Engebretsen, Lars F Jonsrud, Christoffer Bjørnevoll, Inga Andresen, Per Arne Ariansen, Sarah Lavik, Liss Anne S Gilde, Bodil Bowitz-Lothe, Inger Marie Mæhle, Lovise Møller, Pål |
author_facet | Sjursen, Wenche Haukanes, Bjørn Ivar Grindedal, Eli Marie Aarset, Harald Stormorken, Astrid Engebretsen, Lars F Jonsrud, Christoffer Bjørnevoll, Inga Andresen, Per Arne Ariansen, Sarah Lavik, Liss Anne S Gilde, Bodil Bowitz-Lothe, Inger Marie Mæhle, Lovise Møller, Pål |
author_sort | Sjursen, Wenche |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reported prevalence, penetrance and expression of deleterious mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2, may reflect differences in the clinical criteria used to select families for DNA testing. The authors have previously reported that clinical criteria are not sensitive enough to identify MMR mutation carriers among incident colorectal cancer cases. OBJECTIVE: To describe the sensitivity of the criteria when applied to families with a demonstrated MMR mutation. METHODS: Families with an aggregation of colorectal cancers were examined for deleterious MMR mutations according to the Mallorca guidelines. All families with a detected MMR mutation as of November 2009 were reclassified according to the Amsterdam and Bethesda criteria. RESULTS: Sixty-nine different DNA variants were identified in a total of 129 families. The original Amsterdam clinical criteria were met by 38%, 12%, 78% and 25% of families with mutations in MSH2, MSH6, MLH1 and PMS2, respectively. Corresponding numbers for the revised Amsterdam criteria were 62%, 48%, 87% and 38%. Similarly, each of the four clinical Bethesda criteria had low sensitivity for identifying MSH6 or PMS2 mutations. CONCLUSION: Amsterdam criteria and each of the Bethesda criteria were inadequate for identifying MSH6 mutation-carrying kindreds. MSH6 mutations may be more common than currently assumed, and the penetrance/expression of MSH6 mutations, as derived from families meeting current clinical criteria, may be misleading. To increase detection rate of MMR mutation carriers, all cancers in the Lynch syndrome tumour spectrum should be subjected to immunohistochemical analysis and/or analysis for microsatellite instability. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2976029 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BMJ Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29760292010-11-26 Current clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome are not sensitive enough to identify MSH6 mutation carriers Sjursen, Wenche Haukanes, Bjørn Ivar Grindedal, Eli Marie Aarset, Harald Stormorken, Astrid Engebretsen, Lars F Jonsrud, Christoffer Bjørnevoll, Inga Andresen, Per Arne Ariansen, Sarah Lavik, Liss Anne S Gilde, Bodil Bowitz-Lothe, Inger Marie Mæhle, Lovise Møller, Pål J Med Genet Original Article BACKGROUND: Reported prevalence, penetrance and expression of deleterious mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2, may reflect differences in the clinical criteria used to select families for DNA testing. The authors have previously reported that clinical criteria are not sensitive enough to identify MMR mutation carriers among incident colorectal cancer cases. OBJECTIVE: To describe the sensitivity of the criteria when applied to families with a demonstrated MMR mutation. METHODS: Families with an aggregation of colorectal cancers were examined for deleterious MMR mutations according to the Mallorca guidelines. All families with a detected MMR mutation as of November 2009 were reclassified according to the Amsterdam and Bethesda criteria. RESULTS: Sixty-nine different DNA variants were identified in a total of 129 families. The original Amsterdam clinical criteria were met by 38%, 12%, 78% and 25% of families with mutations in MSH2, MSH6, MLH1 and PMS2, respectively. Corresponding numbers for the revised Amsterdam criteria were 62%, 48%, 87% and 38%. Similarly, each of the four clinical Bethesda criteria had low sensitivity for identifying MSH6 or PMS2 mutations. CONCLUSION: Amsterdam criteria and each of the Bethesda criteria were inadequate for identifying MSH6 mutation-carrying kindreds. MSH6 mutations may be more common than currently assumed, and the penetrance/expression of MSH6 mutations, as derived from families meeting current clinical criteria, may be misleading. To increase detection rate of MMR mutation carriers, all cancers in the Lynch syndrome tumour spectrum should be subjected to immunohistochemical analysis and/or analysis for microsatellite instability. BMJ Group 2010-06-28 2010-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2976029/ /pubmed/20587412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2010.077677 Text en © 2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sjursen, Wenche Haukanes, Bjørn Ivar Grindedal, Eli Marie Aarset, Harald Stormorken, Astrid Engebretsen, Lars F Jonsrud, Christoffer Bjørnevoll, Inga Andresen, Per Arne Ariansen, Sarah Lavik, Liss Anne S Gilde, Bodil Bowitz-Lothe, Inger Marie Mæhle, Lovise Møller, Pål Current clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome are not sensitive enough to identify MSH6 mutation carriers |
title | Current clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome are not sensitive enough to identify MSH6 mutation carriers |
title_full | Current clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome are not sensitive enough to identify MSH6 mutation carriers |
title_fullStr | Current clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome are not sensitive enough to identify MSH6 mutation carriers |
title_full_unstemmed | Current clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome are not sensitive enough to identify MSH6 mutation carriers |
title_short | Current clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome are not sensitive enough to identify MSH6 mutation carriers |
title_sort | current clinical criteria for lynch syndrome are not sensitive enough to identify msh6 mutation carriers |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2976029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20587412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2010.077677 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sjursenwenche currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers AT haukanesbjørnivar currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers AT grindedalelimarie currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers AT aarsetharald currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers AT stormorkenastrid currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers AT engebretsenlarsf currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers AT jonsrudchristoffer currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers AT bjørnevollinga currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers AT andresenperarne currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers AT ariansensarah currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers AT laviklissannes currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers AT gildebodil currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers AT bowitzlotheingermarie currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers AT mæhlelovise currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers AT møllerpal currentclinicalcriteriaforlynchsyndromearenotsensitiveenoughtoidentifymsh6mutationcarriers |