Cargando…

Policy-driven tobacco control

BACKGROUND: Since the passage of Proposition 99, California's comprehensive tobacco control programme has benefited from a localised policy adoption process that allows for the innovation and diffusion of strong local tobacco control policies throughout the state. METHODS: The policy adoption c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Francis, John A, Abramsohn, Erin M, Park, Hye-Youn
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2976507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20382645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2009.030718
_version_ 1782190984007778304
author Francis, John A
Abramsohn, Erin M
Park, Hye-Youn
author_facet Francis, John A
Abramsohn, Erin M
Park, Hye-Youn
author_sort Francis, John A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Since the passage of Proposition 99, California's comprehensive tobacco control programme has benefited from a localised policy adoption process that allows for the innovation and diffusion of strong local tobacco control policies throughout the state. METHODS: The policy adoption continuum is described in the context of California's smoke-free workplace movement, and the influence of policy-driven tobacco control initiatives on social norms, behaviour and the public's health was examined. RESULTS: The Smoke-free California policy adoption continuum reflects a general approach for policy innovation and diffusion that builds social acceptance and influences social norms, while minimising unintended consequences and creating best practices in tobacco control. California's local smoke-free workplace policies have reduced secondhand smoke exposure and supported attitude and behaviour changes. The effects of local policy adoption led to the nation's first statewide smoke-free workplace law. CONCLUSIONS: Proposition 99 created an unprecedented tobacco control infrastructure that supported local policy innovation and diffusion to influence social norms and behaviours. Tobacco control policy efforts should address campaign challenges, oppose pre-emption and confront tobacco industry influence. Advocates must be cautious of pursuing a statewide policy prematurely, as it may result in a weak and/or pre-emptive policy that can stymie local policy efforts and prolong the adoption of a meaningful statewide policy.
format Text
id pubmed-2976507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29765072010-11-26 Policy-driven tobacco control Francis, John A Abramsohn, Erin M Park, Hye-Youn Tob Control Research Paper BACKGROUND: Since the passage of Proposition 99, California's comprehensive tobacco control programme has benefited from a localised policy adoption process that allows for the innovation and diffusion of strong local tobacco control policies throughout the state. METHODS: The policy adoption continuum is described in the context of California's smoke-free workplace movement, and the influence of policy-driven tobacco control initiatives on social norms, behaviour and the public's health was examined. RESULTS: The Smoke-free California policy adoption continuum reflects a general approach for policy innovation and diffusion that builds social acceptance and influences social norms, while minimising unintended consequences and creating best practices in tobacco control. California's local smoke-free workplace policies have reduced secondhand smoke exposure and supported attitude and behaviour changes. The effects of local policy adoption led to the nation's first statewide smoke-free workplace law. CONCLUSIONS: Proposition 99 created an unprecedented tobacco control infrastructure that supported local policy innovation and diffusion to influence social norms and behaviours. Tobacco control policy efforts should address campaign challenges, oppose pre-emption and confront tobacco industry influence. Advocates must be cautious of pursuing a statewide policy prematurely, as it may result in a weak and/or pre-emptive policy that can stymie local policy efforts and prolong the adoption of a meaningful statewide policy. BMJ Group 2010-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2976507/ /pubmed/20382645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2009.030718 Text en © 2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Francis, John A
Abramsohn, Erin M
Park, Hye-Youn
Policy-driven tobacco control
title Policy-driven tobacco control
title_full Policy-driven tobacco control
title_fullStr Policy-driven tobacco control
title_full_unstemmed Policy-driven tobacco control
title_short Policy-driven tobacco control
title_sort policy-driven tobacco control
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2976507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20382645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2009.030718
work_keys_str_mv AT francisjohna policydriventobaccocontrol
AT abramsohnerinm policydriventobaccocontrol
AT parkhyeyoun policydriventobaccocontrol