Cargando…

Tobacco marketing in California and implications for the future

BACKGROUND: Tobacco marketing influences tobacco use initiation, maintenance of use, and it undermines comprehensive tobacco control programmes. Policies to ban the impact of tobacco marketing are most likely to be more effective if they are comprehensive, as partial bans shift marketing to non-bann...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roeseler, April, Feighery, Ellen C, Cruz, Tess Boley
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2976534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20382646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2009.031963
_version_ 1782190985852223488
author Roeseler, April
Feighery, Ellen C
Cruz, Tess Boley
author_facet Roeseler, April
Feighery, Ellen C
Cruz, Tess Boley
author_sort Roeseler, April
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tobacco marketing influences tobacco use initiation, maintenance of use, and it undermines comprehensive tobacco control programmes. Policies to ban the impact of tobacco marketing are most likely to be more effective if they are comprehensive, as partial bans shift marketing to non-banned forms of media. A comprehensive approach to reducing tobacco marketing includes documentation through monitoring, media and policy interventions and aggressive enforcement of existing laws. METHODS: This paper summarises California tobacco industry monitoring of events and retail outlets, and findings about exposure to and beliefs about tobacco industry marketing among youths and adults conducted during the period 2000 through 2008. RESULTS: There was no overall change in the average number of cigarette materials per store, and an increase in the percentage of stores with advertisements promoting price discounts for cigarettes. Stores with cigarette advertisements near candy displays declined from 12.5% (95% CI 9.8% to 15.2%) to 1% (95% CI 0.2% to 1.9%) of stores, and advertisements at or below the eye-level of children declined from 78.6% (95% CI 75.2% to 82.0%) to 31% (95% CI 27.1% to 34.9%) of stores. Overall, the number of public events with tobacco sponsorship declined from 77.3% to 48.1%. This trend was consistent with a significant decline noted among high school students and adults who reported seeing tobacco advertisements at events or attending a tobacco company-sponsored event. CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco industry monitoring, media, policy and enforcement interventions may have contributed to observed changes in tobacco marketing and to declines in reported exposure to tobacco marketing.
format Text
id pubmed-2976534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29765342010-11-26 Tobacco marketing in California and implications for the future Roeseler, April Feighery, Ellen C Cruz, Tess Boley Tob Control Research Paper BACKGROUND: Tobacco marketing influences tobacco use initiation, maintenance of use, and it undermines comprehensive tobacco control programmes. Policies to ban the impact of tobacco marketing are most likely to be more effective if they are comprehensive, as partial bans shift marketing to non-banned forms of media. A comprehensive approach to reducing tobacco marketing includes documentation through monitoring, media and policy interventions and aggressive enforcement of existing laws. METHODS: This paper summarises California tobacco industry monitoring of events and retail outlets, and findings about exposure to and beliefs about tobacco industry marketing among youths and adults conducted during the period 2000 through 2008. RESULTS: There was no overall change in the average number of cigarette materials per store, and an increase in the percentage of stores with advertisements promoting price discounts for cigarettes. Stores with cigarette advertisements near candy displays declined from 12.5% (95% CI 9.8% to 15.2%) to 1% (95% CI 0.2% to 1.9%) of stores, and advertisements at or below the eye-level of children declined from 78.6% (95% CI 75.2% to 82.0%) to 31% (95% CI 27.1% to 34.9%) of stores. Overall, the number of public events with tobacco sponsorship declined from 77.3% to 48.1%. This trend was consistent with a significant decline noted among high school students and adults who reported seeing tobacco advertisements at events or attending a tobacco company-sponsored event. CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco industry monitoring, media, policy and enforcement interventions may have contributed to observed changes in tobacco marketing and to declines in reported exposure to tobacco marketing. BMJ Group 2010-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2976534/ /pubmed/20382646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2009.031963 Text en © 2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Roeseler, April
Feighery, Ellen C
Cruz, Tess Boley
Tobacco marketing in California and implications for the future
title Tobacco marketing in California and implications for the future
title_full Tobacco marketing in California and implications for the future
title_fullStr Tobacco marketing in California and implications for the future
title_full_unstemmed Tobacco marketing in California and implications for the future
title_short Tobacco marketing in California and implications for the future
title_sort tobacco marketing in california and implications for the future
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2976534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20382646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2009.031963
work_keys_str_mv AT roeselerapril tobaccomarketingincaliforniaandimplicationsforthefuture
AT feigheryellenc tobaccomarketingincaliforniaandimplicationsforthefuture
AT cruztessboley tobaccomarketingincaliforniaandimplicationsforthefuture