Cargando…
Tobacco marketing in California and implications for the future
BACKGROUND: Tobacco marketing influences tobacco use initiation, maintenance of use, and it undermines comprehensive tobacco control programmes. Policies to ban the impact of tobacco marketing are most likely to be more effective if they are comprehensive, as partial bans shift marketing to non-bann...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Group
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2976534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20382646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2009.031963 |
_version_ | 1782190985852223488 |
---|---|
author | Roeseler, April Feighery, Ellen C Cruz, Tess Boley |
author_facet | Roeseler, April Feighery, Ellen C Cruz, Tess Boley |
author_sort | Roeseler, April |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Tobacco marketing influences tobacco use initiation, maintenance of use, and it undermines comprehensive tobacco control programmes. Policies to ban the impact of tobacco marketing are most likely to be more effective if they are comprehensive, as partial bans shift marketing to non-banned forms of media. A comprehensive approach to reducing tobacco marketing includes documentation through monitoring, media and policy interventions and aggressive enforcement of existing laws. METHODS: This paper summarises California tobacco industry monitoring of events and retail outlets, and findings about exposure to and beliefs about tobacco industry marketing among youths and adults conducted during the period 2000 through 2008. RESULTS: There was no overall change in the average number of cigarette materials per store, and an increase in the percentage of stores with advertisements promoting price discounts for cigarettes. Stores with cigarette advertisements near candy displays declined from 12.5% (95% CI 9.8% to 15.2%) to 1% (95% CI 0.2% to 1.9%) of stores, and advertisements at or below the eye-level of children declined from 78.6% (95% CI 75.2% to 82.0%) to 31% (95% CI 27.1% to 34.9%) of stores. Overall, the number of public events with tobacco sponsorship declined from 77.3% to 48.1%. This trend was consistent with a significant decline noted among high school students and adults who reported seeing tobacco advertisements at events or attending a tobacco company-sponsored event. CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco industry monitoring, media, policy and enforcement interventions may have contributed to observed changes in tobacco marketing and to declines in reported exposure to tobacco marketing. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2976534 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BMJ Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29765342010-11-26 Tobacco marketing in California and implications for the future Roeseler, April Feighery, Ellen C Cruz, Tess Boley Tob Control Research Paper BACKGROUND: Tobacco marketing influences tobacco use initiation, maintenance of use, and it undermines comprehensive tobacco control programmes. Policies to ban the impact of tobacco marketing are most likely to be more effective if they are comprehensive, as partial bans shift marketing to non-banned forms of media. A comprehensive approach to reducing tobacco marketing includes documentation through monitoring, media and policy interventions and aggressive enforcement of existing laws. METHODS: This paper summarises California tobacco industry monitoring of events and retail outlets, and findings about exposure to and beliefs about tobacco industry marketing among youths and adults conducted during the period 2000 through 2008. RESULTS: There was no overall change in the average number of cigarette materials per store, and an increase in the percentage of stores with advertisements promoting price discounts for cigarettes. Stores with cigarette advertisements near candy displays declined from 12.5% (95% CI 9.8% to 15.2%) to 1% (95% CI 0.2% to 1.9%) of stores, and advertisements at or below the eye-level of children declined from 78.6% (95% CI 75.2% to 82.0%) to 31% (95% CI 27.1% to 34.9%) of stores. Overall, the number of public events with tobacco sponsorship declined from 77.3% to 48.1%. This trend was consistent with a significant decline noted among high school students and adults who reported seeing tobacco advertisements at events or attending a tobacco company-sponsored event. CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco industry monitoring, media, policy and enforcement interventions may have contributed to observed changes in tobacco marketing and to declines in reported exposure to tobacco marketing. BMJ Group 2010-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2976534/ /pubmed/20382646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2009.031963 Text en © 2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Roeseler, April Feighery, Ellen C Cruz, Tess Boley Tobacco marketing in California and implications for the future |
title | Tobacco marketing in California and implications for the future |
title_full | Tobacco marketing in California and implications for the future |
title_fullStr | Tobacco marketing in California and implications for the future |
title_full_unstemmed | Tobacco marketing in California and implications for the future |
title_short | Tobacco marketing in California and implications for the future |
title_sort | tobacco marketing in california and implications for the future |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2976534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20382646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2009.031963 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roeselerapril tobaccomarketingincaliforniaandimplicationsforthefuture AT feigheryellenc tobaccomarketingincaliforniaandimplicationsforthefuture AT cruztessboley tobaccomarketingincaliforniaandimplicationsforthefuture |