Cargando…

Potentials of Mean Force for Protein Structure Prediction Vindicated, Formalized and Generalized

Understanding protein structure is of crucial importance in science, medicine and biotechnology. For about two decades, knowledge-based potentials based on pairwise distances – so-called “potentials of mean force” (PMFs) – have been center stage in the prediction and design of protein structure and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamelryck, Thomas, Borg, Mikael, Paluszewski, Martin, Paulsen, Jonas, Frellsen, Jes, Andreetta, Christian, Boomsma, Wouter, Bottaro, Sandro, Ferkinghoff-Borg, Jesper
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2978081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21103041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013714
_version_ 1782191209159065600
author Hamelryck, Thomas
Borg, Mikael
Paluszewski, Martin
Paulsen, Jonas
Frellsen, Jes
Andreetta, Christian
Boomsma, Wouter
Bottaro, Sandro
Ferkinghoff-Borg, Jesper
author_facet Hamelryck, Thomas
Borg, Mikael
Paluszewski, Martin
Paulsen, Jonas
Frellsen, Jes
Andreetta, Christian
Boomsma, Wouter
Bottaro, Sandro
Ferkinghoff-Borg, Jesper
author_sort Hamelryck, Thomas
collection PubMed
description Understanding protein structure is of crucial importance in science, medicine and biotechnology. For about two decades, knowledge-based potentials based on pairwise distances – so-called “potentials of mean force” (PMFs) – have been center stage in the prediction and design of protein structure and the simulation of protein folding. However, the validity, scope and limitations of these potentials are still vigorously debated and disputed, and the optimal choice of the reference state – a necessary component of these potentials – is an unsolved problem. PMFs are loosely justified by analogy to the reversible work theorem in statistical physics, or by a statistical argument based on a likelihood function. Both justifications are insightful but leave many questions unanswered. Here, we show for the first time that PMFs can be seen as approximations to quantities that do have a rigorous probabilistic justification: they naturally arise when probability distributions over different features of proteins need to be combined. We call these quantities “reference ratio distributions” deriving from the application of the “reference ratio method.” This new view is not only of theoretical relevance but leads to many insights that are of direct practical use: the reference state is uniquely defined and does not require external physical insights; the approach can be generalized beyond pairwise distances to arbitrary features of protein structure; and it becomes clear for which purposes the use of these quantities is justified. We illustrate these insights with two applications, involving the radius of gyration and hydrogen bonding. In the latter case, we also show how the reference ratio method can be iteratively applied to sculpt an energy funnel. Our results considerably increase the understanding and scope of energy functions derived from known biomolecular structures.
format Text
id pubmed-2978081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29780812010-11-22 Potentials of Mean Force for Protein Structure Prediction Vindicated, Formalized and Generalized Hamelryck, Thomas Borg, Mikael Paluszewski, Martin Paulsen, Jonas Frellsen, Jes Andreetta, Christian Boomsma, Wouter Bottaro, Sandro Ferkinghoff-Borg, Jesper PLoS One Research Article Understanding protein structure is of crucial importance in science, medicine and biotechnology. For about two decades, knowledge-based potentials based on pairwise distances – so-called “potentials of mean force” (PMFs) – have been center stage in the prediction and design of protein structure and the simulation of protein folding. However, the validity, scope and limitations of these potentials are still vigorously debated and disputed, and the optimal choice of the reference state – a necessary component of these potentials – is an unsolved problem. PMFs are loosely justified by analogy to the reversible work theorem in statistical physics, or by a statistical argument based on a likelihood function. Both justifications are insightful but leave many questions unanswered. Here, we show for the first time that PMFs can be seen as approximations to quantities that do have a rigorous probabilistic justification: they naturally arise when probability distributions over different features of proteins need to be combined. We call these quantities “reference ratio distributions” deriving from the application of the “reference ratio method.” This new view is not only of theoretical relevance but leads to many insights that are of direct practical use: the reference state is uniquely defined and does not require external physical insights; the approach can be generalized beyond pairwise distances to arbitrary features of protein structure; and it becomes clear for which purposes the use of these quantities is justified. We illustrate these insights with two applications, involving the radius of gyration and hydrogen bonding. In the latter case, we also show how the reference ratio method can be iteratively applied to sculpt an energy funnel. Our results considerably increase the understanding and scope of energy functions derived from known biomolecular structures. Public Library of Science 2010-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2978081/ /pubmed/21103041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013714 Text en Hamelryck et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hamelryck, Thomas
Borg, Mikael
Paluszewski, Martin
Paulsen, Jonas
Frellsen, Jes
Andreetta, Christian
Boomsma, Wouter
Bottaro, Sandro
Ferkinghoff-Borg, Jesper
Potentials of Mean Force for Protein Structure Prediction Vindicated, Formalized and Generalized
title Potentials of Mean Force for Protein Structure Prediction Vindicated, Formalized and Generalized
title_full Potentials of Mean Force for Protein Structure Prediction Vindicated, Formalized and Generalized
title_fullStr Potentials of Mean Force for Protein Structure Prediction Vindicated, Formalized and Generalized
title_full_unstemmed Potentials of Mean Force for Protein Structure Prediction Vindicated, Formalized and Generalized
title_short Potentials of Mean Force for Protein Structure Prediction Vindicated, Formalized and Generalized
title_sort potentials of mean force for protein structure prediction vindicated, formalized and generalized
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2978081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21103041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013714
work_keys_str_mv AT hamelryckthomas potentialsofmeanforceforproteinstructurepredictionvindicatedformalizedandgeneralized
AT borgmikael potentialsofmeanforceforproteinstructurepredictionvindicatedformalizedandgeneralized
AT paluszewskimartin potentialsofmeanforceforproteinstructurepredictionvindicatedformalizedandgeneralized
AT paulsenjonas potentialsofmeanforceforproteinstructurepredictionvindicatedformalizedandgeneralized
AT frellsenjes potentialsofmeanforceforproteinstructurepredictionvindicatedformalizedandgeneralized
AT andreettachristian potentialsofmeanforceforproteinstructurepredictionvindicatedformalizedandgeneralized
AT boomsmawouter potentialsofmeanforceforproteinstructurepredictionvindicatedformalizedandgeneralized
AT bottarosandro potentialsofmeanforceforproteinstructurepredictionvindicatedformalizedandgeneralized
AT ferkinghoffborgjesper potentialsofmeanforceforproteinstructurepredictionvindicatedformalizedandgeneralized