Cargando…
Indirect Comparisons: A Review of Reporting and Methodological Quality
BACKGROUND: The indirect comparison of two interventions can be valuable in many situations. However, the quality of an indirect comparison will depend on several factors including the chosen methodology and validity of underlying assumptions. Published indirect comparisons are increasingly more com...
Autores principales: | Donegan, Sarah, Williamson, Paula, Gamble, Carrol, Tudur-Smith, Catrin |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2978085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21085712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011054 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reporting of harms outcomes: a comparison of journal publications with unpublished clinical study reports of orlistat trials
por: Hodkinson, Alex, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Reporting of harms data in RCTs: a systematic review of empirical assessments against the CONSORT harms extension
por: Hodkinson, Alex, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Risk-proportionate clinical trial monitoring: an example approach from a non-commercial trials unit
por: Tudur Smith, Catrin, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities
por: Bower, Peter, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise
por: Tudur Smith, Catrin, et al.
Publicado: (2014)