Cargando…
Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions
BACKGROUND: The past decade has seen considerable interest in the development and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Such interventions can only have a significant impact on health and health care if they are shown to be effective when tested, are capable of being widely implemen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2978112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20961442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-63 |
_version_ | 1782191216487563264 |
---|---|
author | Murray, Elizabeth Treweek, Shaun Pope, Catherine MacFarlane, Anne Ballini, Luciana Dowrick, Christopher Finch, Tracy Kennedy, Anne Mair, Frances O'Donnell, Catherine Ong, Bie Nio Rapley, Tim Rogers, Anne May, Carl |
author_facet | Murray, Elizabeth Treweek, Shaun Pope, Catherine MacFarlane, Anne Ballini, Luciana Dowrick, Christopher Finch, Tracy Kennedy, Anne Mair, Frances O'Donnell, Catherine Ong, Bie Nio Rapley, Tim Rogers, Anne May, Carl |
author_sort | Murray, Elizabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The past decade has seen considerable interest in the development and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Such interventions can only have a significant impact on health and health care if they are shown to be effective when tested, are capable of being widely implemented and can be normalised into routine practice. To date, there is still a problematic gap between research and implementation. The Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) addresses the factors needed for successful implementation and integration of interventions into routine work (normalisation). DISCUSSION: In this paper, we suggest that the NPT can act as a sensitising tool, enabling researchers to think through issues of implementation while designing a complex intervention and its evaluation. The need to ensure trial procedures that are feasible and compatible with clinical practice is not limited to trials of complex interventions, and NPT may improve trial design by highlighting potential problems with recruitment or data collection, as well as ensuring the intervention has good implementation potential. SUMMARY: The NPT is a new theory which offers trialists a consistent framework that can be used to describe, assess and enhance implementation potential. We encourage trialists to consider using it in their next trial. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2978112 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29781122010-11-11 Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions Murray, Elizabeth Treweek, Shaun Pope, Catherine MacFarlane, Anne Ballini, Luciana Dowrick, Christopher Finch, Tracy Kennedy, Anne Mair, Frances O'Donnell, Catherine Ong, Bie Nio Rapley, Tim Rogers, Anne May, Carl BMC Med Debate BACKGROUND: The past decade has seen considerable interest in the development and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Such interventions can only have a significant impact on health and health care if they are shown to be effective when tested, are capable of being widely implemented and can be normalised into routine practice. To date, there is still a problematic gap between research and implementation. The Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) addresses the factors needed for successful implementation and integration of interventions into routine work (normalisation). DISCUSSION: In this paper, we suggest that the NPT can act as a sensitising tool, enabling researchers to think through issues of implementation while designing a complex intervention and its evaluation. The need to ensure trial procedures that are feasible and compatible with clinical practice is not limited to trials of complex interventions, and NPT may improve trial design by highlighting potential problems with recruitment or data collection, as well as ensuring the intervention has good implementation potential. SUMMARY: The NPT is a new theory which offers trialists a consistent framework that can be used to describe, assess and enhance implementation potential. We encourage trialists to consider using it in their next trial. BioMed Central 2010-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2978112/ /pubmed/20961442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-63 Text en Copyright ©2010 Murray et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Debate Murray, Elizabeth Treweek, Shaun Pope, Catherine MacFarlane, Anne Ballini, Luciana Dowrick, Christopher Finch, Tracy Kennedy, Anne Mair, Frances O'Donnell, Catherine Ong, Bie Nio Rapley, Tim Rogers, Anne May, Carl Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions |
title | Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions |
title_full | Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions |
title_fullStr | Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions |
title_short | Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions |
title_sort | normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2978112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20961442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-63 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murrayelizabeth normalisationprocesstheoryaframeworkfordevelopingevaluatingandimplementingcomplexinterventions AT treweekshaun normalisationprocesstheoryaframeworkfordevelopingevaluatingandimplementingcomplexinterventions AT popecatherine normalisationprocesstheoryaframeworkfordevelopingevaluatingandimplementingcomplexinterventions AT macfarlaneanne normalisationprocesstheoryaframeworkfordevelopingevaluatingandimplementingcomplexinterventions AT balliniluciana normalisationprocesstheoryaframeworkfordevelopingevaluatingandimplementingcomplexinterventions AT dowrickchristopher normalisationprocesstheoryaframeworkfordevelopingevaluatingandimplementingcomplexinterventions AT finchtracy normalisationprocesstheoryaframeworkfordevelopingevaluatingandimplementingcomplexinterventions AT kennedyanne normalisationprocesstheoryaframeworkfordevelopingevaluatingandimplementingcomplexinterventions AT mairfrances normalisationprocesstheoryaframeworkfordevelopingevaluatingandimplementingcomplexinterventions AT odonnellcatherine normalisationprocesstheoryaframeworkfordevelopingevaluatingandimplementingcomplexinterventions AT ongbienio normalisationprocesstheoryaframeworkfordevelopingevaluatingandimplementingcomplexinterventions AT rapleytim normalisationprocesstheoryaframeworkfordevelopingevaluatingandimplementingcomplexinterventions AT rogersanne normalisationprocesstheoryaframeworkfordevelopingevaluatingandimplementingcomplexinterventions AT maycarl normalisationprocesstheoryaframeworkfordevelopingevaluatingandimplementingcomplexinterventions |