Cargando…

Variability in film reader estimates of breast density in the PERFORMS scheme

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Darker, IT, Gale, AG, Chen, Y
Formato:	Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2010
Materias:	Poster Presentation
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2978859/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr2695

Ejemplares similares

Breast ultrasound training scheme
por: Gale, AG, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Mammographic interpretation training: what exactly do film-readers want?
por: Chen, Y, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Assessing mammography film-reader performance
por: Wilkinson, LS, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Symptomatic and screening film-readers: a difference in reading style?
por: Scott, HJ, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

What makes a good mammographer? Looking at the homogeneity of those groups who perform best and least well on the PERFORMS self-assessment scheme
por: Scott, HJ, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Early identification of substandard breast screening performers
por: Dong, L, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Performance in digital mammography with and without film prior mammograms
por: Taylor-Phillips, S, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Breast screening unit size and performance on self-assessment (PERFORMS)
por: Scott, HJ, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Breast screening radiographers and radiologists: performance and confidence levels on the PERFORMS film sets
por: Scott, HJ, et al.
Publicado: (2004)

Cross-Atlantic differences in reading the same breast screening cases
por: Chen, Y, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

The feasibility of vision-supported computer-based training in digital mammography
por: Chen, Y, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Are abnormalities missed in the PERFORMS self-assessment scheme due to visual or cognitive factors?
por: Chen, Y, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Repeatability of breast density visual assessment
por: Walshaw, L, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Digital mammography: the human factors implications
por: Brace, C, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Should prior film mammograms be digitised during the transition to digital mammography?
por: Taylor-Phillips, S, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

PB.13: Comparison between analogue and digital mammography: a reader's perspective
por: Gay, H, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Breast density as a predictor of breast cancer risk
por: Lip, G, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Estimation of efficacy early selective LPS sorption in patients with septic shock
por: Kulabukhov, VV, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

PB.11: Identifying women at high risk of developing breast cancer: implications of adjusting for inter-observer variability in visual analogue scale assessment of percentage breast density
por: Sergeant, JC, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Improving the validity of breast density assessment
por: Eadie, A, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Breast density measurement for personalised screening
por: Sergeant, JC, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Aortic arch width by CMR is highly reproducible between readers and across imaging sequences
por: Qazi, Saadia, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Estimation of neural voltage traces and associated variables in uncertain models
por: Closas, Pau, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

PB.23. Breast density in previous screening mammograms of women with and without breast cancer
por: Sivagnanam, L, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Hourly and accurate severe sepsis classification using kernel density estimates
por: Parente, Jacquelyn D, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

PB.10: Breast compression, compressed breast thickness and volumetric breast density
por: Khan-Perez, J, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The effect of age and breast density on the sensitivity of mammography
por: Kavanagh, AM, et al.
Publicado: (2004)

PB.24. How does volumetric breast density change with time?
por: Daniels, J, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Kernel density estimation of CSD distributions - an application to knowledge based molecular optimisation
por: McCabe, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Reproducibility of CMR right ventricle volumetric measurements is independent of reader experience under a standardized protocol
por: Foppa, Murilo, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Measuring reader fatigue in the interpretation of screening digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)
por: Chen, Yan, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

PB.18: Factors affecting breast density assessment
por: Beattie, L, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Accelerated 4D flow imaging with variable-density cartesian undersampling and parallel imaging reconstruction
por: Liu, Jing, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The influence of hashed fingerprints density on the machine learning methods performance
por: Smusz, Sabina, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Automatic segmentation of myocardium at risk from contrast enhanced SSFP CMR: validation against expert readers and SPECT
por: Tufvesson, Jane, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Workforce issues in breast imaging: radiographers as screen readers
por: Bennett, RL, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

PB.35. How does semi-automated computer-derived CT measure of breast density compare with subjective assessments to measure mean glandular breast density in patients with breast cancer?
por: Bansal, G, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Accuracy of breast cancer detection with full-field digital mammography and integral computer-aided detection correlated with breast density as assessed by a new automated volumetric breast density measurement system
por: Pinker, K, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Estimating the fraction of falsely detected spikes in high density microelectrode array recordings based on correlations
por: Muthmann, Jens-Oliver, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Estimating transmission intensity from P.falciparum serological data using antibody density models
por: Pothin, Emilie, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_8e559qi3emih6o75e1rmudekst