Cargando…

Automated Detection of Radiology Reports that Document Non-routine Communication of Critical or Significant Results

The purpose of this investigation is to develop an automated method to accurately detect radiology reports that indicate non-routine communication of critical or significant results. Such a classification system would be valuable for performance monitoring and accreditation. Using a database of 2.3...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lakhani, Paras, Langlotz, Curtis P.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2978900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19826871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-009-9237-1
_version_ 1782191317308145664
author Lakhani, Paras
Langlotz, Curtis P.
author_facet Lakhani, Paras
Langlotz, Curtis P.
author_sort Lakhani, Paras
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this investigation is to develop an automated method to accurately detect radiology reports that indicate non-routine communication of critical or significant results. Such a classification system would be valuable for performance monitoring and accreditation. Using a database of 2.3 million free-text radiology reports, a rule-based query algorithm was developed after analyzing hundreds of radiology reports that indicated communication of critical or significant results to a healthcare provider. This algorithm consisted of words and phrases used by radiologists to indicate such communications combined with specific handcrafted rules. This algorithm was iteratively refined and retested on hundreds of reports until the precision and recall did not significantly change between iterations. The algorithm was then validated on the entire database of 2.3 million reports, excluding those reports used during the testing and refinement process. Human review was used as the reference standard. The accuracy of this algorithm was determined using precision, recall, and F measure. Confidence intervals were calculated using the adjusted Wald method. The developed algorithm for detecting critical result communication has a precision of 97.0% (95% CI, 93.5–98.8%), recall 98.2% (95% CI, 93.4–100%), and F measure of 97.6% (ß = 1). Our query algorithm is accurate for identifying radiology reports that contain non-routine communication of critical or significant results. This algorithm can be applied to a radiology reports database for quality control purposes and help satisfy accreditation requirements.
format Text
id pubmed-2978900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29789002010-12-08 Automated Detection of Radiology Reports that Document Non-routine Communication of Critical or Significant Results Lakhani, Paras Langlotz, Curtis P. J Digit Imaging Article The purpose of this investigation is to develop an automated method to accurately detect radiology reports that indicate non-routine communication of critical or significant results. Such a classification system would be valuable for performance monitoring and accreditation. Using a database of 2.3 million free-text radiology reports, a rule-based query algorithm was developed after analyzing hundreds of radiology reports that indicated communication of critical or significant results to a healthcare provider. This algorithm consisted of words and phrases used by radiologists to indicate such communications combined with specific handcrafted rules. This algorithm was iteratively refined and retested on hundreds of reports until the precision and recall did not significantly change between iterations. The algorithm was then validated on the entire database of 2.3 million reports, excluding those reports used during the testing and refinement process. Human review was used as the reference standard. The accuracy of this algorithm was determined using precision, recall, and F measure. Confidence intervals were calculated using the adjusted Wald method. The developed algorithm for detecting critical result communication has a precision of 97.0% (95% CI, 93.5–98.8%), recall 98.2% (95% CI, 93.4–100%), and F measure of 97.6% (ß = 1). Our query algorithm is accurate for identifying radiology reports that contain non-routine communication of critical or significant results. This algorithm can be applied to a radiology reports database for quality control purposes and help satisfy accreditation requirements. Springer-Verlag 2009-10-14 2010-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2978900/ /pubmed/19826871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-009-9237-1 Text en © Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2009
spellingShingle Article
Lakhani, Paras
Langlotz, Curtis P.
Automated Detection of Radiology Reports that Document Non-routine Communication of Critical or Significant Results
title Automated Detection of Radiology Reports that Document Non-routine Communication of Critical or Significant Results
title_full Automated Detection of Radiology Reports that Document Non-routine Communication of Critical or Significant Results
title_fullStr Automated Detection of Radiology Reports that Document Non-routine Communication of Critical or Significant Results
title_full_unstemmed Automated Detection of Radiology Reports that Document Non-routine Communication of Critical or Significant Results
title_short Automated Detection of Radiology Reports that Document Non-routine Communication of Critical or Significant Results
title_sort automated detection of radiology reports that document non-routine communication of critical or significant results
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2978900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19826871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-009-9237-1
work_keys_str_mv AT lakhaniparas automateddetectionofradiologyreportsthatdocumentnonroutinecommunicationofcriticalorsignificantresults
AT langlotzcurtisp automateddetectionofradiologyreportsthatdocumentnonroutinecommunicationofcriticalorsignificantresults