Cargando…

Comparison of temperature rise in the pulp chamber with different light curing units: An in-vitro study

AIMS/OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study was designed to measure and compare the temperature rise in the pulp chamber with different light curing units. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was done in two settings-in-vitro and in-vivo simulation. In in-vitro setting, 3mm and 6mm acrylic spacers with 4mm ti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajesh Ebenezar, A V, Anilkumar, R, Indira, R, Ramachandran, S, Srinivasan, M R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2980608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21116387
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.71644
_version_ 1782191631975317504
author Rajesh Ebenezar, A V
Anilkumar, R
Indira, R
Ramachandran, S
Srinivasan, M R
author_facet Rajesh Ebenezar, A V
Anilkumar, R
Indira, R
Ramachandran, S
Srinivasan, M R
author_sort Rajesh Ebenezar, A V
collection PubMed
description AIMS/OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study was designed to measure and compare the temperature rise in the pulp chamber with different light curing units. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was done in two settings-in-vitro and in-vivo simulation. In in-vitro setting, 3mm and 6mm acrylic spacers with 4mm tip diameter thermocouple was used and six groups were formed according to the light curing source- 3 Quartz-Tungsten-Halogen (QTH) units and 3 Light-Emitting-Diode (LED) units. For the LED units, three modes of curing like pulse-cure mode, fast mode and ramp mode were used. For in-vivo simulation, 12 caries free human third molar tooth with fused root were used. K-type thermocouple with 1 mm tip diameter was used. Occlusal cavity was prepared, etched, rinsed with water and blot dried; bonding agent was applied and incremental curing of composite was done. Thermal emission for each light curing agent was noted. RESULTS: Temperature rise was very minimal in LED light cure units than in QTH light cure units in both the settings. Temperature rise was minimal at 6mm distance when compared to 3 mm distance. Among the various modes, fast mode produces the less temperature rise. Temperature rise in all the light curing units was well within the normal range of pulpal physiology. CONCLUSION: Temperature rise caused due to light curing units does not result in irreversible pulpal damage.
format Text
id pubmed-2980608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29806082010-11-29 Comparison of temperature rise in the pulp chamber with different light curing units: An in-vitro study Rajesh Ebenezar, A V Anilkumar, R Indira, R Ramachandran, S Srinivasan, M R J Conserv Dent Original Article AIMS/OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study was designed to measure and compare the temperature rise in the pulp chamber with different light curing units. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was done in two settings-in-vitro and in-vivo simulation. In in-vitro setting, 3mm and 6mm acrylic spacers with 4mm tip diameter thermocouple was used and six groups were formed according to the light curing source- 3 Quartz-Tungsten-Halogen (QTH) units and 3 Light-Emitting-Diode (LED) units. For the LED units, three modes of curing like pulse-cure mode, fast mode and ramp mode were used. For in-vivo simulation, 12 caries free human third molar tooth with fused root were used. K-type thermocouple with 1 mm tip diameter was used. Occlusal cavity was prepared, etched, rinsed with water and blot dried; bonding agent was applied and incremental curing of composite was done. Thermal emission for each light curing agent was noted. RESULTS: Temperature rise was very minimal in LED light cure units than in QTH light cure units in both the settings. Temperature rise was minimal at 6mm distance when compared to 3 mm distance. Among the various modes, fast mode produces the less temperature rise. Temperature rise in all the light curing units was well within the normal range of pulpal physiology. CONCLUSION: Temperature rise caused due to light curing units does not result in irreversible pulpal damage. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2980608/ /pubmed/21116387 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.71644 Text en © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rajesh Ebenezar, A V
Anilkumar, R
Indira, R
Ramachandran, S
Srinivasan, M R
Comparison of temperature rise in the pulp chamber with different light curing units: An in-vitro study
title Comparison of temperature rise in the pulp chamber with different light curing units: An in-vitro study
title_full Comparison of temperature rise in the pulp chamber with different light curing units: An in-vitro study
title_fullStr Comparison of temperature rise in the pulp chamber with different light curing units: An in-vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of temperature rise in the pulp chamber with different light curing units: An in-vitro study
title_short Comparison of temperature rise in the pulp chamber with different light curing units: An in-vitro study
title_sort comparison of temperature rise in the pulp chamber with different light curing units: an in-vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2980608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21116387
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.71644
work_keys_str_mv AT rajeshebenezarav comparisonoftemperatureriseinthepulpchamberwithdifferentlightcuringunitsaninvitrostudy
AT anilkumarr comparisonoftemperatureriseinthepulpchamberwithdifferentlightcuringunitsaninvitrostudy
AT indirar comparisonoftemperatureriseinthepulpchamberwithdifferentlightcuringunitsaninvitrostudy
AT ramachandrans comparisonoftemperatureriseinthepulpchamberwithdifferentlightcuringunitsaninvitrostudy
AT srinivasanmr comparisonoftemperatureriseinthepulpchamberwithdifferentlightcuringunitsaninvitrostudy