Cargando…

Marginal permeability of one step self-etch adhesives: Effects of double application or the application of hydrophobic layer

AIM: The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate the influence of double application and application of hydrophobic layer on marginal adaptation of four self-etch adhesive systems (XENOIII, ALLBONDSE, CLEARFIL SE TRI BOND, FUTURA BOND). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pushpa, R, Suresh, B S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2980610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21116389
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.71646
_version_ 1782191632448225280
author Pushpa, R
Suresh, B S
author_facet Pushpa, R
Suresh, B S
author_sort Pushpa, R
collection PubMed
description AIM: The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate the influence of double application and application of hydrophobic layer on marginal adaptation of four self-etch adhesive systems (XENOIII, ALLBONDSE, CLEARFIL SE TRI BOND, FUTURA BOND). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty class V cavities were prepared on intact, extracted human premolars and were divided into three groups of ten teeth each for all four adhesives. Group 1: Application of bonding agents as per manufacturer directions. Group 2: Double application of bonding agents. Group 3: Application of hydrophobic layer. The specimens were restored with composite and light cured. After thermocycling and immersion in 2% Basic Fuchsin dye solution, the teeth were sectioned and dye penetration was observed under a stereomicroscope at 20× magnification. All the samples were scored and results were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: Group 3, in which the adhesive systems were coated with hydrophobic layer, showed significantly decreased microleakage, followed by Group 1 and Group 2 for all the adhesive systems. And there is no significant different between Group 1 and Group 2. CONCLUSION: Marginal permeability of one-step adhesives can be minimized by the application of more hydrophobic resin layer, and the double application of one-step self-etch system can be safely performed without jeopardizing the performance of adhesives.
format Text
id pubmed-2980610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29806102010-11-29 Marginal permeability of one step self-etch adhesives: Effects of double application or the application of hydrophobic layer Pushpa, R Suresh, B S J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate the influence of double application and application of hydrophobic layer on marginal adaptation of four self-etch adhesive systems (XENOIII, ALLBONDSE, CLEARFIL SE TRI BOND, FUTURA BOND). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty class V cavities were prepared on intact, extracted human premolars and were divided into three groups of ten teeth each for all four adhesives. Group 1: Application of bonding agents as per manufacturer directions. Group 2: Double application of bonding agents. Group 3: Application of hydrophobic layer. The specimens were restored with composite and light cured. After thermocycling and immersion in 2% Basic Fuchsin dye solution, the teeth were sectioned and dye penetration was observed under a stereomicroscope at 20× magnification. All the samples were scored and results were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: Group 3, in which the adhesive systems were coated with hydrophobic layer, showed significantly decreased microleakage, followed by Group 1 and Group 2 for all the adhesive systems. And there is no significant different between Group 1 and Group 2. CONCLUSION: Marginal permeability of one-step adhesives can be minimized by the application of more hydrophobic resin layer, and the double application of one-step self-etch system can be safely performed without jeopardizing the performance of adhesives. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2980610/ /pubmed/21116389 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.71646 Text en © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pushpa, R
Suresh, B S
Marginal permeability of one step self-etch adhesives: Effects of double application or the application of hydrophobic layer
title Marginal permeability of one step self-etch adhesives: Effects of double application or the application of hydrophobic layer
title_full Marginal permeability of one step self-etch adhesives: Effects of double application or the application of hydrophobic layer
title_fullStr Marginal permeability of one step self-etch adhesives: Effects of double application or the application of hydrophobic layer
title_full_unstemmed Marginal permeability of one step self-etch adhesives: Effects of double application or the application of hydrophobic layer
title_short Marginal permeability of one step self-etch adhesives: Effects of double application or the application of hydrophobic layer
title_sort marginal permeability of one step self-etch adhesives: effects of double application or the application of hydrophobic layer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2980610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21116389
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.71646
work_keys_str_mv AT pushpar marginalpermeabilityofonestepselfetchadhesiveseffectsofdoubleapplicationortheapplicationofhydrophobiclayer
AT sureshbs marginalpermeabilityofonestepselfetchadhesiveseffectsofdoubleapplicationortheapplicationofhydrophobiclayer