Cargando…
Marginal permeability of one step self-etch adhesives: Effects of double application or the application of hydrophobic layer
AIM: The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate the influence of double application and application of hydrophobic layer on marginal adaptation of four self-etch adhesive systems (XENOIII, ALLBONDSE, CLEARFIL SE TRI BOND, FUTURA BOND). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty cl...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2980610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21116389 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.71646 |
_version_ | 1782191632448225280 |
---|---|
author | Pushpa, R Suresh, B S |
author_facet | Pushpa, R Suresh, B S |
author_sort | Pushpa, R |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate the influence of double application and application of hydrophobic layer on marginal adaptation of four self-etch adhesive systems (XENOIII, ALLBONDSE, CLEARFIL SE TRI BOND, FUTURA BOND). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty class V cavities were prepared on intact, extracted human premolars and were divided into three groups of ten teeth each for all four adhesives. Group 1: Application of bonding agents as per manufacturer directions. Group 2: Double application of bonding agents. Group 3: Application of hydrophobic layer. The specimens were restored with composite and light cured. After thermocycling and immersion in 2% Basic Fuchsin dye solution, the teeth were sectioned and dye penetration was observed under a stereomicroscope at 20× magnification. All the samples were scored and results were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: Group 3, in which the adhesive systems were coated with hydrophobic layer, showed significantly decreased microleakage, followed by Group 1 and Group 2 for all the adhesive systems. And there is no significant different between Group 1 and Group 2. CONCLUSION: Marginal permeability of one-step adhesives can be minimized by the application of more hydrophobic resin layer, and the double application of one-step self-etch system can be safely performed without jeopardizing the performance of adhesives. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2980610 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29806102010-11-29 Marginal permeability of one step self-etch adhesives: Effects of double application or the application of hydrophobic layer Pushpa, R Suresh, B S J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate the influence of double application and application of hydrophobic layer on marginal adaptation of four self-etch adhesive systems (XENOIII, ALLBONDSE, CLEARFIL SE TRI BOND, FUTURA BOND). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty class V cavities were prepared on intact, extracted human premolars and were divided into three groups of ten teeth each for all four adhesives. Group 1: Application of bonding agents as per manufacturer directions. Group 2: Double application of bonding agents. Group 3: Application of hydrophobic layer. The specimens were restored with composite and light cured. After thermocycling and immersion in 2% Basic Fuchsin dye solution, the teeth were sectioned and dye penetration was observed under a stereomicroscope at 20× magnification. All the samples were scored and results were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: Group 3, in which the adhesive systems were coated with hydrophobic layer, showed significantly decreased microleakage, followed by Group 1 and Group 2 for all the adhesive systems. And there is no significant different between Group 1 and Group 2. CONCLUSION: Marginal permeability of one-step adhesives can be minimized by the application of more hydrophobic resin layer, and the double application of one-step self-etch system can be safely performed without jeopardizing the performance of adhesives. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2980610/ /pubmed/21116389 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.71646 Text en © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Pushpa, R Suresh, B S Marginal permeability of one step self-etch adhesives: Effects of double application or the application of hydrophobic layer |
title | Marginal permeability of one step self-etch adhesives: Effects of double application or the application of hydrophobic layer |
title_full | Marginal permeability of one step self-etch adhesives: Effects of double application or the application of hydrophobic layer |
title_fullStr | Marginal permeability of one step self-etch adhesives: Effects of double application or the application of hydrophobic layer |
title_full_unstemmed | Marginal permeability of one step self-etch adhesives: Effects of double application or the application of hydrophobic layer |
title_short | Marginal permeability of one step self-etch adhesives: Effects of double application or the application of hydrophobic layer |
title_sort | marginal permeability of one step self-etch adhesives: effects of double application or the application of hydrophobic layer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2980610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21116389 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.71646 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pushpar marginalpermeabilityofonestepselfetchadhesiveseffectsofdoubleapplicationortheapplicationofhydrophobiclayer AT sureshbs marginalpermeabilityofonestepselfetchadhesiveseffectsofdoubleapplicationortheapplicationofhydrophobiclayer |