Cargando…

Evaluation of two commercial lateral flow devices (LFDs) used for flockside testing of H5N1 highly-pathogenic avian influenza infections in backyard gallinaceous poultry in Egypt

Quickvue and Anigen lateral flow devices (LFDs) were evaluated for detection of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) infections in Egyptian poultry. Sixty five chickens and two turkeys were sampled in eight flocks where H5N1 HPAI infection was suspected. Swabs (tracheal and cloacal) and fea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soliman, Mohammed, Selim, Abdullah, Coward, Vivien J, Hassan, Mohammed K, Aly, Mona M, Banks, Jill, Slomka, Marek J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Library Publishing Media 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2981883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21139668
_version_ 1782191723489787904
author Soliman, Mohammed
Selim, Abdullah
Coward, Vivien J
Hassan, Mohammed K
Aly, Mona M
Banks, Jill
Slomka, Marek J
author_facet Soliman, Mohammed
Selim, Abdullah
Coward, Vivien J
Hassan, Mohammed K
Aly, Mona M
Banks, Jill
Slomka, Marek J
author_sort Soliman, Mohammed
collection PubMed
description Quickvue and Anigen lateral flow devices (LFDs) were evaluated for detection of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) infections in Egyptian poultry. Sixty five chickens and two turkeys were sampled in eight flocks where H5N1 HPAI infection was suspected. Swabs (tracheal and cloacal) and feathers were collected from each bird for flockside testing by the two LFDs. The same clinical specimens were transported for laboratory testing by M gene RRT PCR where a positive result by this “gold standard” test for one or both swabs from a given bird indicated infection at the bird level, showing 57 birds (including 15 carcassess) to be truly AI infected. Among these 57, similar bird-level LFD testing of swabs showed 43 and 44 to be AI infected by Quickvue and Anigen LFDs, respectively. Nine birds were AI negative by M gene RRT PCR and both LFDs, and one was M gene RRT PCR negative but positive by both LFDs, suggesting one false positive LFD result. Sensitivities of the LFDs relative to M gene RRT PCR were 77.2% for Anigen and 75.4% for Quickvue tests, with 90.0% specificity for both. By including feathers with swabs for LFD testing, the number of LFD positives among 57 infected birds increased by four to 48 by Anigen and 47 by Quickvue, increasing the sensitivity of the LFDs to 84.2% and 82.5% for Anigen and Quickvue, respectively. Although LFD sensitivity cannot compare to the high sensitivity displayed by validated AI RRT PCRs, they may be utilised for flockside testing of birds infected with HPAI at the peak of viral shedding, when birds are displaying advanced clinical signs or sampled as fresh carcasses. Swabs are classic field specimens collected from outbreaks, but inclusion of feathers from birds infected with H5N1 HPAI increased LFD sensitivity. However, the LFD false positive observation emphasises the importance of returning samples for confirmatory laboratory testing.
format Text
id pubmed-2981883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Library Publishing Media
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29818832010-12-06 Evaluation of two commercial lateral flow devices (LFDs) used for flockside testing of H5N1 highly-pathogenic avian influenza infections in backyard gallinaceous poultry in Egypt Soliman, Mohammed Selim, Abdullah Coward, Vivien J Hassan, Mohammed K Aly, Mona M Banks, Jill Slomka, Marek J J Mol Genet Med Technology Report Quickvue and Anigen lateral flow devices (LFDs) were evaluated for detection of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) infections in Egyptian poultry. Sixty five chickens and two turkeys were sampled in eight flocks where H5N1 HPAI infection was suspected. Swabs (tracheal and cloacal) and feathers were collected from each bird for flockside testing by the two LFDs. The same clinical specimens were transported for laboratory testing by M gene RRT PCR where a positive result by this “gold standard” test for one or both swabs from a given bird indicated infection at the bird level, showing 57 birds (including 15 carcassess) to be truly AI infected. Among these 57, similar bird-level LFD testing of swabs showed 43 and 44 to be AI infected by Quickvue and Anigen LFDs, respectively. Nine birds were AI negative by M gene RRT PCR and both LFDs, and one was M gene RRT PCR negative but positive by both LFDs, suggesting one false positive LFD result. Sensitivities of the LFDs relative to M gene RRT PCR were 77.2% for Anigen and 75.4% for Quickvue tests, with 90.0% specificity for both. By including feathers with swabs for LFD testing, the number of LFD positives among 57 infected birds increased by four to 48 by Anigen and 47 by Quickvue, increasing the sensitivity of the LFDs to 84.2% and 82.5% for Anigen and Quickvue, respectively. Although LFD sensitivity cannot compare to the high sensitivity displayed by validated AI RRT PCRs, they may be utilised for flockside testing of birds infected with HPAI at the peak of viral shedding, when birds are displaying advanced clinical signs or sampled as fresh carcasses. Swabs are classic field specimens collected from outbreaks, but inclusion of feathers from birds infected with H5N1 HPAI increased LFD sensitivity. However, the LFD false positive observation emphasises the importance of returning samples for confirmatory laboratory testing. Library Publishing Media 2010-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2981883/ /pubmed/21139668 Text en © The Authors http://www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/system/online/pLogin.asp This article is being published and displayed under the terms and conditions of the Click-Use Licence. The article or its contents may be reproduced by obtaining a PSI Click-Use Licence at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/system/online/pLogin.asp.
spellingShingle Technology Report
Soliman, Mohammed
Selim, Abdullah
Coward, Vivien J
Hassan, Mohammed K
Aly, Mona M
Banks, Jill
Slomka, Marek J
Evaluation of two commercial lateral flow devices (LFDs) used for flockside testing of H5N1 highly-pathogenic avian influenza infections in backyard gallinaceous poultry in Egypt
title Evaluation of two commercial lateral flow devices (LFDs) used for flockside testing of H5N1 highly-pathogenic avian influenza infections in backyard gallinaceous poultry in Egypt
title_full Evaluation of two commercial lateral flow devices (LFDs) used for flockside testing of H5N1 highly-pathogenic avian influenza infections in backyard gallinaceous poultry in Egypt
title_fullStr Evaluation of two commercial lateral flow devices (LFDs) used for flockside testing of H5N1 highly-pathogenic avian influenza infections in backyard gallinaceous poultry in Egypt
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of two commercial lateral flow devices (LFDs) used for flockside testing of H5N1 highly-pathogenic avian influenza infections in backyard gallinaceous poultry in Egypt
title_short Evaluation of two commercial lateral flow devices (LFDs) used for flockside testing of H5N1 highly-pathogenic avian influenza infections in backyard gallinaceous poultry in Egypt
title_sort evaluation of two commercial lateral flow devices (lfds) used for flockside testing of h5n1 highly-pathogenic avian influenza infections in backyard gallinaceous poultry in egypt
topic Technology Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2981883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21139668
work_keys_str_mv AT solimanmohammed evaluationoftwocommerciallateralflowdeviceslfdsusedforflocksidetestingofh5n1highlypathogenicavianinfluenzainfectionsinbackyardgallinaceouspoultryinegypt
AT selimabdullah evaluationoftwocommerciallateralflowdeviceslfdsusedforflocksidetestingofh5n1highlypathogenicavianinfluenzainfectionsinbackyardgallinaceouspoultryinegypt
AT cowardvivienj evaluationoftwocommerciallateralflowdeviceslfdsusedforflocksidetestingofh5n1highlypathogenicavianinfluenzainfectionsinbackyardgallinaceouspoultryinegypt
AT hassanmohammedk evaluationoftwocommerciallateralflowdeviceslfdsusedforflocksidetestingofh5n1highlypathogenicavianinfluenzainfectionsinbackyardgallinaceouspoultryinegypt
AT alymonam evaluationoftwocommerciallateralflowdeviceslfdsusedforflocksidetestingofh5n1highlypathogenicavianinfluenzainfectionsinbackyardgallinaceouspoultryinegypt
AT banksjill evaluationoftwocommerciallateralflowdeviceslfdsusedforflocksidetestingofh5n1highlypathogenicavianinfluenzainfectionsinbackyardgallinaceouspoultryinegypt
AT slomkamarekj evaluationoftwocommerciallateralflowdeviceslfdsusedforflocksidetestingofh5n1highlypathogenicavianinfluenzainfectionsinbackyardgallinaceouspoultryinegypt