Cargando…
Outcome measurements in orthopedic
The choice of outcome measure in orthopedic clinical research studies is paramount. The primary outcome measure for a study has several implications for the design and conduct of the study. These include: 1) sample size determination, 2) internal validity, 3) compliance and 4) cost. A thorough knowl...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2981892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21124680 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.30523 |
_version_ | 1782191725668728832 |
---|---|
author | Bhandari, Mohit Petrisor, Brad Schemitsch, Emil |
author_facet | Bhandari, Mohit Petrisor, Brad Schemitsch, Emil |
author_sort | Bhandari, Mohit |
collection | PubMed |
description | The choice of outcome measure in orthopedic clinical research studies is paramount. The primary outcome measure for a study has several implications for the design and conduct of the study. These include: 1) sample size determination, 2) internal validity, 3) compliance and 4) cost. A thorough knowledge of outcome measures in orthopedic research is paramount to the conduct of a quality study. The decision to choose a continuous versus dichotomous outcome has important implications for sample size. However, regardless of the type of outcome, investigators should always use the most ‘patient-important’ outcome and limit bias in its determination. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2981892 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29818922010-12-01 Outcome measurements in orthopedic Bhandari, Mohit Petrisor, Brad Schemitsch, Emil Indian J Orthop Symposium - Research Methodology The choice of outcome measure in orthopedic clinical research studies is paramount. The primary outcome measure for a study has several implications for the design and conduct of the study. These include: 1) sample size determination, 2) internal validity, 3) compliance and 4) cost. A thorough knowledge of outcome measures in orthopedic research is paramount to the conduct of a quality study. The decision to choose a continuous versus dichotomous outcome has important implications for sample size. However, regardless of the type of outcome, investigators should always use the most ‘patient-important’ outcome and limit bias in its determination. Medknow Publications 2007 /pmc/articles/PMC2981892/ /pubmed/21124680 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.30523 Text en © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Symposium - Research Methodology Bhandari, Mohit Petrisor, Brad Schemitsch, Emil Outcome measurements in orthopedic |
title | Outcome measurements in orthopedic |
title_full | Outcome measurements in orthopedic |
title_fullStr | Outcome measurements in orthopedic |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcome measurements in orthopedic |
title_short | Outcome measurements in orthopedic |
title_sort | outcome measurements in orthopedic |
topic | Symposium - Research Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2981892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21124680 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.30523 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhandarimohit outcomemeasurementsinorthopedic AT petrisorbrad outcomemeasurementsinorthopedic AT schemitschemil outcomemeasurementsinorthopedic |