Cargando…

Outcome measurements in orthopedic

The choice of outcome measure in orthopedic clinical research studies is paramount. The primary outcome measure for a study has several implications for the design and conduct of the study. These include: 1) sample size determination, 2) internal validity, 3) compliance and 4) cost. A thorough knowl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhandari, Mohit, Petrisor, Brad, Schemitsch, Emil
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2981892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21124680
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.30523
_version_ 1782191725668728832
author Bhandari, Mohit
Petrisor, Brad
Schemitsch, Emil
author_facet Bhandari, Mohit
Petrisor, Brad
Schemitsch, Emil
author_sort Bhandari, Mohit
collection PubMed
description The choice of outcome measure in orthopedic clinical research studies is paramount. The primary outcome measure for a study has several implications for the design and conduct of the study. These include: 1) sample size determination, 2) internal validity, 3) compliance and 4) cost. A thorough knowledge of outcome measures in orthopedic research is paramount to the conduct of a quality study. The decision to choose a continuous versus dichotomous outcome has important implications for sample size. However, regardless of the type of outcome, investigators should always use the most ‘patient-important’ outcome and limit bias in its determination.
format Text
id pubmed-2981892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29818922010-12-01 Outcome measurements in orthopedic Bhandari, Mohit Petrisor, Brad Schemitsch, Emil Indian J Orthop Symposium - Research Methodology The choice of outcome measure in orthopedic clinical research studies is paramount. The primary outcome measure for a study has several implications for the design and conduct of the study. These include: 1) sample size determination, 2) internal validity, 3) compliance and 4) cost. A thorough knowledge of outcome measures in orthopedic research is paramount to the conduct of a quality study. The decision to choose a continuous versus dichotomous outcome has important implications for sample size. However, regardless of the type of outcome, investigators should always use the most ‘patient-important’ outcome and limit bias in its determination. Medknow Publications 2007 /pmc/articles/PMC2981892/ /pubmed/21124680 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.30523 Text en © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Symposium - Research Methodology
Bhandari, Mohit
Petrisor, Brad
Schemitsch, Emil
Outcome measurements in orthopedic
title Outcome measurements in orthopedic
title_full Outcome measurements in orthopedic
title_fullStr Outcome measurements in orthopedic
title_full_unstemmed Outcome measurements in orthopedic
title_short Outcome measurements in orthopedic
title_sort outcome measurements in orthopedic
topic Symposium - Research Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2981892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21124680
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.30523
work_keys_str_mv AT bhandarimohit outcomemeasurementsinorthopedic
AT petrisorbrad outcomemeasurementsinorthopedic
AT schemitschemil outcomemeasurementsinorthopedic