Cargando…
Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial
Objectives To see whether telling peer reviewers that their signed reviews of original research papers might be posted on the BMJ’s website would affect the quality of their reviews. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting A large international general medical journal based in the United Kingdom...
Autores principales: | van Rooyen, Susan, Delamothe, Tony, Evans, Stephen J W |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2982798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21081600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5729 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
A guide to performing a peer review of randomised controlled trials
por: Del Mar, Chris, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of peer support for people with severe mental illness
por: Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Influence of peer review on the reporting of primary outcome(s) and statistical analyses of randomised trials
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
What is open peer review? A systematic review
por: Ross-Hellauer, Tony
Publicado: (2017)