Cargando…

How absolute is zero? An evaluation of historical and current definitions of malaria elimination

Decisions to eliminate malaria from all or part of a country involve a complex set of factors, and this complexity is compounded by ambiguity surrounding some of the key terminology, most notably "control" and "elimination." It is impossible to forecast resource and operational r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cohen, Justin M, Moonen, Bruno, Snow, Robert W, Smith, David L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2983111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20649972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-213
_version_ 1782191803318927360
author Cohen, Justin M
Moonen, Bruno
Snow, Robert W
Smith, David L
author_facet Cohen, Justin M
Moonen, Bruno
Snow, Robert W
Smith, David L
author_sort Cohen, Justin M
collection PubMed
description Decisions to eliminate malaria from all or part of a country involve a complex set of factors, and this complexity is compounded by ambiguity surrounding some of the key terminology, most notably "control" and "elimination." It is impossible to forecast resource and operational requirements accurately if endpoints have not been defined clearly, yet even during the Global Malaria Eradication Program, debate raged over the precise definition of "eradication." Analogous deliberations regarding the meaning of "elimination" and "control" are basically nonexistent today despite these terms' core importance to programme planning. To advance the contemporary debate about these issues, this paper presents a historical review of commonly used terms, including control, elimination, and eradication, to help contextualize current understanding of these concepts. The review has been supported by analysis of the underlying mathematical concepts on which these definitions are based through simple branching process models that describe the proliferation of malaria cases following importation. Through this analysis, the importance of pragmatic definitions that are useful for providing malaria control and elimination programmes with a practical set of strategic milestones is emphasized, and it is argued that current conceptions of elimination in particular fail to achieve these requirements. To provide all countries with precise targets, new conceptual definitions are suggested to more precisely describe the old goals of "control" - here more exactly named "controlled low-endemic malaria" - and "elimination." Additionally, it is argued that a third state, called "controlled non-endemic malaria," is required to describe the epidemiological condition in which endemic transmission has been interrupted, but malaria resulting from onwards transmission from imported infections continues to occur at a sufficiently high level that elimination has not been achieved. Finally, guidelines are discussed for deriving the separate operational definitions and metrics that will be required to make these concepts relevant, measurable, and achievable for a particular environment.
format Text
id pubmed-2983111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29831112010-11-17 How absolute is zero? An evaluation of historical and current definitions of malaria elimination Cohen, Justin M Moonen, Bruno Snow, Robert W Smith, David L Malar J Review Decisions to eliminate malaria from all or part of a country involve a complex set of factors, and this complexity is compounded by ambiguity surrounding some of the key terminology, most notably "control" and "elimination." It is impossible to forecast resource and operational requirements accurately if endpoints have not been defined clearly, yet even during the Global Malaria Eradication Program, debate raged over the precise definition of "eradication." Analogous deliberations regarding the meaning of "elimination" and "control" are basically nonexistent today despite these terms' core importance to programme planning. To advance the contemporary debate about these issues, this paper presents a historical review of commonly used terms, including control, elimination, and eradication, to help contextualize current understanding of these concepts. The review has been supported by analysis of the underlying mathematical concepts on which these definitions are based through simple branching process models that describe the proliferation of malaria cases following importation. Through this analysis, the importance of pragmatic definitions that are useful for providing malaria control and elimination programmes with a practical set of strategic milestones is emphasized, and it is argued that current conceptions of elimination in particular fail to achieve these requirements. To provide all countries with precise targets, new conceptual definitions are suggested to more precisely describe the old goals of "control" - here more exactly named "controlled low-endemic malaria" - and "elimination." Additionally, it is argued that a third state, called "controlled non-endemic malaria," is required to describe the epidemiological condition in which endemic transmission has been interrupted, but malaria resulting from onwards transmission from imported infections continues to occur at a sufficiently high level that elimination has not been achieved. Finally, guidelines are discussed for deriving the separate operational definitions and metrics that will be required to make these concepts relevant, measurable, and achievable for a particular environment. BioMed Central 2010-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2983111/ /pubmed/20649972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-213 Text en Copyright ©2010 Cohen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Cohen, Justin M
Moonen, Bruno
Snow, Robert W
Smith, David L
How absolute is zero? An evaluation of historical and current definitions of malaria elimination
title How absolute is zero? An evaluation of historical and current definitions of malaria elimination
title_full How absolute is zero? An evaluation of historical and current definitions of malaria elimination
title_fullStr How absolute is zero? An evaluation of historical and current definitions of malaria elimination
title_full_unstemmed How absolute is zero? An evaluation of historical and current definitions of malaria elimination
title_short How absolute is zero? An evaluation of historical and current definitions of malaria elimination
title_sort how absolute is zero? an evaluation of historical and current definitions of malaria elimination
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2983111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20649972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-213
work_keys_str_mv AT cohenjustinm howabsoluteiszeroanevaluationofhistoricalandcurrentdefinitionsofmalariaelimination
AT moonenbruno howabsoluteiszeroanevaluationofhistoricalandcurrentdefinitionsofmalariaelimination
AT snowrobertw howabsoluteiszeroanevaluationofhistoricalandcurrentdefinitionsofmalariaelimination
AT smithdavidl howabsoluteiszeroanevaluationofhistoricalandcurrentdefinitionsofmalariaelimination