Cargando…
Dimebon disappointment
Dimebon (latrepirdine) has received widespread publicity as a potential therapy for Alzheimer's disease following a very positive phase 2 study carried out in Russia and published in the Lancet in 2008. In this study there were improvements over 6 months in all endpoints (cognitive, global, dai...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2983434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20836898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/alzrt49 |
_version_ | 1782191881855172608 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Roy W |
author_facet | Jones, Roy W |
author_sort | Jones, Roy W |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dimebon (latrepirdine) has received widespread publicity as a potential therapy for Alzheimer's disease following a very positive phase 2 study carried out in Russia and published in the Lancet in 2008. In this study there were improvements over 6 months in all endpoints (cognitive, global, daily function and behaviour), with continuing improvement at 12 months in cognition and daily function. A more recent multinational phase 3 study, however, showed no improvements whatsoever and no difference between the two drug-treated groups and the placebo group. Of note, there was little deterioration in any of the groups after 6 months in contrast to the placebo group in the phase 2 study. The potential reasons for these disappointing results are discussed, as well as the implication for dimebon and drug treatment in Alzheimer's disease. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2983434 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29834342011-03-13 Dimebon disappointment Jones, Roy W Alzheimers Res Ther Commentary Dimebon (latrepirdine) has received widespread publicity as a potential therapy for Alzheimer's disease following a very positive phase 2 study carried out in Russia and published in the Lancet in 2008. In this study there were improvements over 6 months in all endpoints (cognitive, global, daily function and behaviour), with continuing improvement at 12 months in cognition and daily function. A more recent multinational phase 3 study, however, showed no improvements whatsoever and no difference between the two drug-treated groups and the placebo group. Of note, there was little deterioration in any of the groups after 6 months in contrast to the placebo group in the phase 2 study. The potential reasons for these disappointing results are discussed, as well as the implication for dimebon and drug treatment in Alzheimer's disease. BioMed Central 2010-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2983434/ /pubmed/20836898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/alzrt49 Text en Copyright ©2010 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Jones, Roy W Dimebon disappointment |
title | Dimebon disappointment |
title_full | Dimebon disappointment |
title_fullStr | Dimebon disappointment |
title_full_unstemmed | Dimebon disappointment |
title_short | Dimebon disappointment |
title_sort | dimebon disappointment |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2983434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20836898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/alzrt49 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonesroyw dimebondisappointment |