Cargando…
An Analysis of Preliminary and Post-Discussion Priority Scores for Grant Applications Peer Reviewed by the Center for Scientific Review at the NIH
There has been the impression amongst many observers that discussion of a grant application has little practical impact on the final priority scores. Rather the final score is largely dictated by the range of preliminary scores given by the assigned reviewers. The implication is that the preliminary...
Autores principales: | Martin, Michael R., Kopstein, Andrea, Janice, Joy M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2984433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21103331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013526 |
Ejemplares similares
-
NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity
por: Fang, Ferric C, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF NIH PEER REVIEW: THE CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC REVIEW
por: Femia, Elia, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
What ails the NIH peer review study sections and how to fix the review process of the grant applications
por: Marian, Ali J.
Publicado: (2023) -
Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores
por: Lindner, Mark D., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
NIH Peer Review: Scored Review Criteria and Overall Impact
por: Lindner, Mark D., et al.
Publicado: (2015)