Cargando…

Evaluation of the late life disability instrument in the lifestyle interventions and independence for elders pilot (LIFE-P) study

BACKGROUND: The late life disability instrument (LLDI) was developed to assess limitations in instrumental and management roles using a small and restricted sample. In this paper we examine the measurement properties of the LLDI using data from the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsu, Fang-Chi, Rejeski, W Jack, Ip, Edward H, Katula, Jeff A, Fielding, Roger, Jette, Alan M, Studenski, Stephanie A, Blair, Steven N, Miller, Michael E
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2984553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20925931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-115
_version_ 1782192113145872384
author Hsu, Fang-Chi
Rejeski, W Jack
Ip, Edward H
Katula, Jeff A
Fielding, Roger
Jette, Alan M
Studenski, Stephanie A
Blair, Steven N
Miller, Michael E
author_facet Hsu, Fang-Chi
Rejeski, W Jack
Ip, Edward H
Katula, Jeff A
Fielding, Roger
Jette, Alan M
Studenski, Stephanie A
Blair, Steven N
Miller, Michael E
author_sort Hsu, Fang-Chi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The late life disability instrument (LLDI) was developed to assess limitations in instrumental and management roles using a small and restricted sample. In this paper we examine the measurement properties of the LLDI using data from the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders Pilot (LIFE-P) study. METHODS: LIFE-P participants, aged 70-89 years, were at elevated risk of disability. The 424 participants were enrolled at the Cooper Institute, Stanford University, University of Pittsburgh, and Wake Forest University. Physical activity and successful aging health education interventions were compared after 12-months of follow-up. Using factor analysis, we determined whether the LLDI's factor structure was comparable with that reported previously. We further examined how each item related to measured disability using item response theory (IRT). RESULTS: The factor structure for the limitation domain within the LLDI in the LIFE-P study did not corroborate previous findings. However, the factor structure using the abbreviated version was supported. Social and personal role factors were identified. IRT analysis revealed that each item in the social role factor provided a similar level of information, whereas the items in the personal role factor tended to provide different levels of information. CONCLUSIONS: Within the context of community-based clinical intervention research in aged populations, an abbreviated version of the LLDI performed better than the full 16-item version. In addition, the personal subscale would benefit from additional research using IRT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol of LIFE-P is consistent with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and is registered at http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov (registration # NCT00116194).
format Text
id pubmed-2984553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29845532010-11-19 Evaluation of the late life disability instrument in the lifestyle interventions and independence for elders pilot (LIFE-P) study Hsu, Fang-Chi Rejeski, W Jack Ip, Edward H Katula, Jeff A Fielding, Roger Jette, Alan M Studenski, Stephanie A Blair, Steven N Miller, Michael E Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The late life disability instrument (LLDI) was developed to assess limitations in instrumental and management roles using a small and restricted sample. In this paper we examine the measurement properties of the LLDI using data from the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders Pilot (LIFE-P) study. METHODS: LIFE-P participants, aged 70-89 years, were at elevated risk of disability. The 424 participants were enrolled at the Cooper Institute, Stanford University, University of Pittsburgh, and Wake Forest University. Physical activity and successful aging health education interventions were compared after 12-months of follow-up. Using factor analysis, we determined whether the LLDI's factor structure was comparable with that reported previously. We further examined how each item related to measured disability using item response theory (IRT). RESULTS: The factor structure for the limitation domain within the LLDI in the LIFE-P study did not corroborate previous findings. However, the factor structure using the abbreviated version was supported. Social and personal role factors were identified. IRT analysis revealed that each item in the social role factor provided a similar level of information, whereas the items in the personal role factor tended to provide different levels of information. CONCLUSIONS: Within the context of community-based clinical intervention research in aged populations, an abbreviated version of the LLDI performed better than the full 16-item version. In addition, the personal subscale would benefit from additional research using IRT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol of LIFE-P is consistent with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and is registered at http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov (registration # NCT00116194). BioMed Central 2010-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2984553/ /pubmed/20925931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-115 Text en Copyright ©2010 Hsu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Hsu, Fang-Chi
Rejeski, W Jack
Ip, Edward H
Katula, Jeff A
Fielding, Roger
Jette, Alan M
Studenski, Stephanie A
Blair, Steven N
Miller, Michael E
Evaluation of the late life disability instrument in the lifestyle interventions and independence for elders pilot (LIFE-P) study
title Evaluation of the late life disability instrument in the lifestyle interventions and independence for elders pilot (LIFE-P) study
title_full Evaluation of the late life disability instrument in the lifestyle interventions and independence for elders pilot (LIFE-P) study
title_fullStr Evaluation of the late life disability instrument in the lifestyle interventions and independence for elders pilot (LIFE-P) study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the late life disability instrument in the lifestyle interventions and independence for elders pilot (LIFE-P) study
title_short Evaluation of the late life disability instrument in the lifestyle interventions and independence for elders pilot (LIFE-P) study
title_sort evaluation of the late life disability instrument in the lifestyle interventions and independence for elders pilot (life-p) study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2984553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20925931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-115
work_keys_str_mv AT hsufangchi evaluationofthelatelifedisabilityinstrumentinthelifestyleinterventionsandindependenceforelderspilotlifepstudy
AT rejeskiwjack evaluationofthelatelifedisabilityinstrumentinthelifestyleinterventionsandindependenceforelderspilotlifepstudy
AT ipedwardh evaluationofthelatelifedisabilityinstrumentinthelifestyleinterventionsandindependenceforelderspilotlifepstudy
AT katulajeffa evaluationofthelatelifedisabilityinstrumentinthelifestyleinterventionsandindependenceforelderspilotlifepstudy
AT fieldingroger evaluationofthelatelifedisabilityinstrumentinthelifestyleinterventionsandindependenceforelderspilotlifepstudy
AT jettealanm evaluationofthelatelifedisabilityinstrumentinthelifestyleinterventionsandindependenceforelderspilotlifepstudy
AT studenskistephaniea evaluationofthelatelifedisabilityinstrumentinthelifestyleinterventionsandindependenceforelderspilotlifepstudy
AT blairstevenn evaluationofthelatelifedisabilityinstrumentinthelifestyleinterventionsandindependenceforelderspilotlifepstudy
AT millermichaele evaluationofthelatelifedisabilityinstrumentinthelifestyleinterventionsandindependenceforelderspilotlifepstudy