Cargando…
Modern concepts in facial nerve reconstruction
BACKGROUND: Reconstructive surgery of the facial nerve is not daily routine for most head and neck surgeons. The published experience on strategies to ensure optimal functional results for the patients are based on small case series with a large variety of surgical techniques. On this background it...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2984557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21040532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-6-25 |
_version_ | 1782192113899798528 |
---|---|
author | Volk, Gerd F Pantel, Mira Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando |
author_facet | Volk, Gerd F Pantel, Mira Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando |
author_sort | Volk, Gerd F |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reconstructive surgery of the facial nerve is not daily routine for most head and neck surgeons. The published experience on strategies to ensure optimal functional results for the patients are based on small case series with a large variety of surgical techniques. On this background it is worthwhile to develop a standardized approach for diagnosis and treatment of patients asking for facial rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: A standardized approach is feasible: Patients with chronic facial palsy first need an exact classification of the palsy's aetiology. A step-by-step clinical examination, if necessary MRI imaging and electromyographic examination allow a classification of the palsy's aetiology as well as the determination of the severity of the palsy and the functional deficits. Considering the patient's desire, age and life expectancy, an individual surgical concept is applicable using three main approaches: a) early extratemporal reconstruction, b) early reconstruction of proximal lesions if extratemporal reconstruction is not possible, c) late reconstruction or in cases of congenital palsy. Twelve to 24 months after the last step of surgical reconstruction a standardized evaluation of the therapeutic results is recommended to evaluate the necessity for adjuvant surgical procedures or other adjuvant procedures, e.g. botulinum toxin application. Up to now controlled trials on the value of physiotherapy and other adjuvant measures are missing to give recommendation for optimal application of adjuvant therapies. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2984557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29845572010-11-19 Modern concepts in facial nerve reconstruction Volk, Gerd F Pantel, Mira Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando Head Face Med Review BACKGROUND: Reconstructive surgery of the facial nerve is not daily routine for most head and neck surgeons. The published experience on strategies to ensure optimal functional results for the patients are based on small case series with a large variety of surgical techniques. On this background it is worthwhile to develop a standardized approach for diagnosis and treatment of patients asking for facial rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: A standardized approach is feasible: Patients with chronic facial palsy first need an exact classification of the palsy's aetiology. A step-by-step clinical examination, if necessary MRI imaging and electromyographic examination allow a classification of the palsy's aetiology as well as the determination of the severity of the palsy and the functional deficits. Considering the patient's desire, age and life expectancy, an individual surgical concept is applicable using three main approaches: a) early extratemporal reconstruction, b) early reconstruction of proximal lesions if extratemporal reconstruction is not possible, c) late reconstruction or in cases of congenital palsy. Twelve to 24 months after the last step of surgical reconstruction a standardized evaluation of the therapeutic results is recommended to evaluate the necessity for adjuvant surgical procedures or other adjuvant procedures, e.g. botulinum toxin application. Up to now controlled trials on the value of physiotherapy and other adjuvant measures are missing to give recommendation for optimal application of adjuvant therapies. BioMed Central 2010-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2984557/ /pubmed/21040532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-6-25 Text en Copyright ©2010 Volk et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Volk, Gerd F Pantel, Mira Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando Modern concepts in facial nerve reconstruction |
title | Modern concepts in facial nerve reconstruction |
title_full | Modern concepts in facial nerve reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Modern concepts in facial nerve reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Modern concepts in facial nerve reconstruction |
title_short | Modern concepts in facial nerve reconstruction |
title_sort | modern concepts in facial nerve reconstruction |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2984557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21040532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-6-25 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT volkgerdf modernconceptsinfacialnervereconstruction AT pantelmira modernconceptsinfacialnervereconstruction AT guntinaslichiusorlando modernconceptsinfacialnervereconstruction |