Cargando…

Modern concepts in facial nerve reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Reconstructive surgery of the facial nerve is not daily routine for most head and neck surgeons. The published experience on strategies to ensure optimal functional results for the patients are based on small case series with a large variety of surgical techniques. On this background it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Volk, Gerd F, Pantel, Mira, Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2984557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21040532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-6-25
_version_ 1782192113899798528
author Volk, Gerd F
Pantel, Mira
Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando
author_facet Volk, Gerd F
Pantel, Mira
Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando
author_sort Volk, Gerd F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reconstructive surgery of the facial nerve is not daily routine for most head and neck surgeons. The published experience on strategies to ensure optimal functional results for the patients are based on small case series with a large variety of surgical techniques. On this background it is worthwhile to develop a standardized approach for diagnosis and treatment of patients asking for facial rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: A standardized approach is feasible: Patients with chronic facial palsy first need an exact classification of the palsy's aetiology. A step-by-step clinical examination, if necessary MRI imaging and electromyographic examination allow a classification of the palsy's aetiology as well as the determination of the severity of the palsy and the functional deficits. Considering the patient's desire, age and life expectancy, an individual surgical concept is applicable using three main approaches: a) early extratemporal reconstruction, b) early reconstruction of proximal lesions if extratemporal reconstruction is not possible, c) late reconstruction or in cases of congenital palsy. Twelve to 24 months after the last step of surgical reconstruction a standardized evaluation of the therapeutic results is recommended to evaluate the necessity for adjuvant surgical procedures or other adjuvant procedures, e.g. botulinum toxin application. Up to now controlled trials on the value of physiotherapy and other adjuvant measures are missing to give recommendation for optimal application of adjuvant therapies.
format Text
id pubmed-2984557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29845572010-11-19 Modern concepts in facial nerve reconstruction Volk, Gerd F Pantel, Mira Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando Head Face Med Review BACKGROUND: Reconstructive surgery of the facial nerve is not daily routine for most head and neck surgeons. The published experience on strategies to ensure optimal functional results for the patients are based on small case series with a large variety of surgical techniques. On this background it is worthwhile to develop a standardized approach for diagnosis and treatment of patients asking for facial rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: A standardized approach is feasible: Patients with chronic facial palsy first need an exact classification of the palsy's aetiology. A step-by-step clinical examination, if necessary MRI imaging and electromyographic examination allow a classification of the palsy's aetiology as well as the determination of the severity of the palsy and the functional deficits. Considering the patient's desire, age and life expectancy, an individual surgical concept is applicable using three main approaches: a) early extratemporal reconstruction, b) early reconstruction of proximal lesions if extratemporal reconstruction is not possible, c) late reconstruction or in cases of congenital palsy. Twelve to 24 months after the last step of surgical reconstruction a standardized evaluation of the therapeutic results is recommended to evaluate the necessity for adjuvant surgical procedures or other adjuvant procedures, e.g. botulinum toxin application. Up to now controlled trials on the value of physiotherapy and other adjuvant measures are missing to give recommendation for optimal application of adjuvant therapies. BioMed Central 2010-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2984557/ /pubmed/21040532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-6-25 Text en Copyright ©2010 Volk et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Volk, Gerd F
Pantel, Mira
Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando
Modern concepts in facial nerve reconstruction
title Modern concepts in facial nerve reconstruction
title_full Modern concepts in facial nerve reconstruction
title_fullStr Modern concepts in facial nerve reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Modern concepts in facial nerve reconstruction
title_short Modern concepts in facial nerve reconstruction
title_sort modern concepts in facial nerve reconstruction
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2984557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21040532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-6-25
work_keys_str_mv AT volkgerdf modernconceptsinfacialnervereconstruction
AT pantelmira modernconceptsinfacialnervereconstruction
AT guntinaslichiusorlando modernconceptsinfacialnervereconstruction