Cargando…

Change in condom and other barrier method use during and after an HIV prevention trial in Zimbabwe

BACKGROUND: We examined the use of male condoms and the diaphragm following completion of a clinical trial of the diaphragm's HIV prevention effectiveness. In the trial, called Methods for Improving Reproductive Health in Africa (MIRA), women were randomized to a diaphragm group (diaphragm, gel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Straten, Ariane, Cheng, Helen, Minnis, Alexandra M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The International AIDS Society 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2984577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20955629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-2652-13-39
_version_ 1782192117403090944
author van der Straten, Ariane
Cheng, Helen
Minnis, Alexandra M
author_facet van der Straten, Ariane
Cheng, Helen
Minnis, Alexandra M
author_sort van der Straten, Ariane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We examined the use of male condoms and the diaphragm following completion of a clinical trial of the diaphragm's HIV prevention effectiveness. In the trial, called Methods for Improving Reproductive Health in Africa (MIRA), women were randomized to a diaphragm group (diaphragm, gel and condoms) or a condom-only control group. At trial exit, all women were offered the diaphragm and condoms. METHODS: Our sample consisted of 801 Zimbabwean MIRA participants who completed one post-trial visit (median lapse: nine months; range two to 20 months). We assessed condom, diaphragm and any barrier method use at last sex act at enrolment, final MIRA and post-trial visits. We used multivariable random effects logistic regression to examine changes in method use between these three time points. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In the condom group, condom use decreased from 86% at the final trial visit to 67% post trial (AOR = 0.20; 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.33). In the diaphragm group, condom use was 61% at the final trial visit, and did not decrease significantly post trial (AOR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.55 to 1.09), while diaphragm use decreased from 79% to 50% post trial (AOR = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.28). Condom use significantly decreased between the enrolment and post-trial visits in both groups. Use of any barrier method was similar in both groups: it significantly decreased between the final trial and the post-trial visits, but did not change between enrolment and the post-trial visits. CONCLUSIONS: High condom use levels achieved during the trial were not sustained post trial in the condom group. Post-trial diaphragm use remained relatively high in the diaphragm group (given its unknown effectiveness), but was very low in the condom group. Introducing "new" methods for HIV prevention may require time and user skills before they get adopted. Our findings underscore the potential benefit of providing a mix of methods to women as it may encourage more protected acts.
format Text
id pubmed-2984577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher The International AIDS Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29845772010-11-19 Change in condom and other barrier method use during and after an HIV prevention trial in Zimbabwe van der Straten, Ariane Cheng, Helen Minnis, Alexandra M J Int AIDS Soc Research BACKGROUND: We examined the use of male condoms and the diaphragm following completion of a clinical trial of the diaphragm's HIV prevention effectiveness. In the trial, called Methods for Improving Reproductive Health in Africa (MIRA), women were randomized to a diaphragm group (diaphragm, gel and condoms) or a condom-only control group. At trial exit, all women were offered the diaphragm and condoms. METHODS: Our sample consisted of 801 Zimbabwean MIRA participants who completed one post-trial visit (median lapse: nine months; range two to 20 months). We assessed condom, diaphragm and any barrier method use at last sex act at enrolment, final MIRA and post-trial visits. We used multivariable random effects logistic regression to examine changes in method use between these three time points. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In the condom group, condom use decreased from 86% at the final trial visit to 67% post trial (AOR = 0.20; 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.33). In the diaphragm group, condom use was 61% at the final trial visit, and did not decrease significantly post trial (AOR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.55 to 1.09), while diaphragm use decreased from 79% to 50% post trial (AOR = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.28). Condom use significantly decreased between the enrolment and post-trial visits in both groups. Use of any barrier method was similar in both groups: it significantly decreased between the final trial and the post-trial visits, but did not change between enrolment and the post-trial visits. CONCLUSIONS: High condom use levels achieved during the trial were not sustained post trial in the condom group. Post-trial diaphragm use remained relatively high in the diaphragm group (given its unknown effectiveness), but was very low in the condom group. Introducing "new" methods for HIV prevention may require time and user skills before they get adopted. Our findings underscore the potential benefit of providing a mix of methods to women as it may encourage more protected acts. The International AIDS Society 2010-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2984577/ /pubmed/20955629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-2652-13-39 Text en Copyright ©2010 van der Straten et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
van der Straten, Ariane
Cheng, Helen
Minnis, Alexandra M
Change in condom and other barrier method use during and after an HIV prevention trial in Zimbabwe
title Change in condom and other barrier method use during and after an HIV prevention trial in Zimbabwe
title_full Change in condom and other barrier method use during and after an HIV prevention trial in Zimbabwe
title_fullStr Change in condom and other barrier method use during and after an HIV prevention trial in Zimbabwe
title_full_unstemmed Change in condom and other barrier method use during and after an HIV prevention trial in Zimbabwe
title_short Change in condom and other barrier method use during and after an HIV prevention trial in Zimbabwe
title_sort change in condom and other barrier method use during and after an hiv prevention trial in zimbabwe
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2984577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20955629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-2652-13-39
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderstratenariane changeincondomandotherbarriermethoduseduringandafteranhivpreventiontrialinzimbabwe
AT chenghelen changeincondomandotherbarriermethoduseduringandafteranhivpreventiontrialinzimbabwe
AT minnisalexandram changeincondomandotherbarriermethoduseduringandafteranhivpreventiontrialinzimbabwe