Cargando…

Sex in an Evolutionary Perspective: Just Another Reaction Norm

It is common to refer to all sorts of clear-cut differences between the sexes as something that is biologically almost inevitable. Although this does not reflect the status of evolutionary theory on sex determination and sexual dimorphism, it is probably a common view among evolutionary biologists a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ah-King, Malin, Nylin, Sören
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2987205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21170116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11692-010-9101-8
_version_ 1782192129055916032
author Ah-King, Malin
Nylin, Sören
author_facet Ah-King, Malin
Nylin, Sören
author_sort Ah-King, Malin
collection PubMed
description It is common to refer to all sorts of clear-cut differences between the sexes as something that is biologically almost inevitable. Although this does not reflect the status of evolutionary theory on sex determination and sexual dimorphism, it is probably a common view among evolutionary biologists as well, because of the impact of sexual selection theory. To get away from thinking about biological sex and traits associated with a particular sex as something static, it should be recognized that in an evolutionary perspective sex can be viewed as a reaction norm, with sex attributes being phenotypically plastic. Sex determination itself is fundamentally plastic, even when it is termed “genetic”. The phenotypic expression of traits that are statistically associated with a particular sex always has a plastic component. This plasticity allows for much more variation in the expression of traits according to sex and more overlap between the sexes than is typically acknowledged. Here we review the variation and frequency of evolutionary changes in sex, sex determination and sex roles and conclude that sex in an evolutionary time-frame is extremely variable. We draw on recent findings in sex determination mechanisms, empirical findings of morphology and behaviour as well as genetic and developmental models to explore the concept of sex as a reaction norm. From this point of view, sexual differences are not expected to generally fall into neat, discrete, pre-determined classes. It is important to acknowledge this variability in order to increase objectivity in evolutionary research.
format Text
id pubmed-2987205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29872052010-12-15 Sex in an Evolutionary Perspective: Just Another Reaction Norm Ah-King, Malin Nylin, Sören Evol Biol Synthesis Paper It is common to refer to all sorts of clear-cut differences between the sexes as something that is biologically almost inevitable. Although this does not reflect the status of evolutionary theory on sex determination and sexual dimorphism, it is probably a common view among evolutionary biologists as well, because of the impact of sexual selection theory. To get away from thinking about biological sex and traits associated with a particular sex as something static, it should be recognized that in an evolutionary perspective sex can be viewed as a reaction norm, with sex attributes being phenotypically plastic. Sex determination itself is fundamentally plastic, even when it is termed “genetic”. The phenotypic expression of traits that are statistically associated with a particular sex always has a plastic component. This plasticity allows for much more variation in the expression of traits according to sex and more overlap between the sexes than is typically acknowledged. Here we review the variation and frequency of evolutionary changes in sex, sex determination and sex roles and conclude that sex in an evolutionary time-frame is extremely variable. We draw on recent findings in sex determination mechanisms, empirical findings of morphology and behaviour as well as genetic and developmental models to explore the concept of sex as a reaction norm. From this point of view, sexual differences are not expected to generally fall into neat, discrete, pre-determined classes. It is important to acknowledge this variability in order to increase objectivity in evolutionary research. Springer US 2010-11-13 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2987205/ /pubmed/21170116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11692-010-9101-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Synthesis Paper
Ah-King, Malin
Nylin, Sören
Sex in an Evolutionary Perspective: Just Another Reaction Norm
title Sex in an Evolutionary Perspective: Just Another Reaction Norm
title_full Sex in an Evolutionary Perspective: Just Another Reaction Norm
title_fullStr Sex in an Evolutionary Perspective: Just Another Reaction Norm
title_full_unstemmed Sex in an Evolutionary Perspective: Just Another Reaction Norm
title_short Sex in an Evolutionary Perspective: Just Another Reaction Norm
title_sort sex in an evolutionary perspective: just another reaction norm
topic Synthesis Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2987205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21170116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11692-010-9101-8
work_keys_str_mv AT ahkingmalin sexinanevolutionaryperspectivejustanotherreactionnorm
AT nylinsoren sexinanevolutionaryperspectivejustanotherreactionnorm