Cargando…

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of two concentrations of a new liquid recombinant human growth hormone formulation versus the freeze-dried formulation

BACKGROUND: Somatropin is recombinant human growth hormone (GH) used for the treatment of growth failure in children and GH deficiency in adults. Two concentrations of a liquid formulation have been developed: 5.83 and 8.0 mg/mL. This trial compared the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and tolerability...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liedert, Bernd, Forssmann, Ulf, Wolna, Peter, Golob, Michaela, Kovar, Andreas
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2987775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20961422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-10-14
_version_ 1782192150663921664
author Liedert, Bernd
Forssmann, Ulf
Wolna, Peter
Golob, Michaela
Kovar, Andreas
author_facet Liedert, Bernd
Forssmann, Ulf
Wolna, Peter
Golob, Michaela
Kovar, Andreas
author_sort Liedert, Bernd
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Somatropin is recombinant human growth hormone (GH) used for the treatment of growth failure in children and GH deficiency in adults. Two concentrations of a liquid formulation have been developed: 5.83 and 8.0 mg/mL. This trial compared the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and tolerability of these two liquid concentrations against the freeze-dried (FD) formulation in healthy volunteers. METHODS: In an open-label, single-centre, three-way crossover study, volunteers (aged 18-45 years) were given subcutaneous injections of the reconstituted FD and two liquid formulations in random sequential order, each at 4 mg/dose, with a 1-week wash-out period between doses. To suppress endogenous GH secretion, intravenous somatostatin was infused continuously 1 hour before to 24 hours after each dose, achieving a cumulative dose of 3 mg. Primary PK endpoints were area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC(0-t)) and maximum serum concentration (C(max)). For each of the two liquid formulations, bioequivalence with the FD formulation was concluded if the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the estimated test/reference ratios of geometric means of AUC(0-t )and C(max )were within the standard pre-specified acceptance range (0.80-1.25). RESULTS: Fifteen men and 15 women enrolled (safety population, n = 30; PK population, n = 28). Bioequivalence with the FD formulation could be shown for both liquid formulations. The ratios of geometric means (95% CI) were 1.046 (0.980, 1.117) and 0.991 (0.929, 1.058) for AUC(0-t )and 0.954 (0.875, 1.040) and 0.955 (0.876, 1.041) for C(max )for the 5.83 and 8.0 mg/mL formulations, respectively. No significant differences between the three treatments in half-lives, time to reach C(max), clearance or volume of distribution were observed. After injection, the most common side-effects were pain or injection-site reactions (all of mild intensity). There were no clinically significant abnormal vital signs, ECG or laboratory findings. There were 56 treatment-related adverse events (AEs): 49 mild, 6 moderate and 1 severe (vomiting). No serious AEs occurred. The pattern of AEs was as expected and all resolved by study end. CONCLUSION: Both concentrations of a new liquid multi-dose formulation are bioequivalent to the FD reference formulation and all are well tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01034735.
format Text
id pubmed-2987775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29877752010-11-19 Comparison of the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of two concentrations of a new liquid recombinant human growth hormone formulation versus the freeze-dried formulation Liedert, Bernd Forssmann, Ulf Wolna, Peter Golob, Michaela Kovar, Andreas BMC Clin Pharmacol Research Article BACKGROUND: Somatropin is recombinant human growth hormone (GH) used for the treatment of growth failure in children and GH deficiency in adults. Two concentrations of a liquid formulation have been developed: 5.83 and 8.0 mg/mL. This trial compared the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and tolerability of these two liquid concentrations against the freeze-dried (FD) formulation in healthy volunteers. METHODS: In an open-label, single-centre, three-way crossover study, volunteers (aged 18-45 years) were given subcutaneous injections of the reconstituted FD and two liquid formulations in random sequential order, each at 4 mg/dose, with a 1-week wash-out period between doses. To suppress endogenous GH secretion, intravenous somatostatin was infused continuously 1 hour before to 24 hours after each dose, achieving a cumulative dose of 3 mg. Primary PK endpoints were area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC(0-t)) and maximum serum concentration (C(max)). For each of the two liquid formulations, bioequivalence with the FD formulation was concluded if the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the estimated test/reference ratios of geometric means of AUC(0-t )and C(max )were within the standard pre-specified acceptance range (0.80-1.25). RESULTS: Fifteen men and 15 women enrolled (safety population, n = 30; PK population, n = 28). Bioequivalence with the FD formulation could be shown for both liquid formulations. The ratios of geometric means (95% CI) were 1.046 (0.980, 1.117) and 0.991 (0.929, 1.058) for AUC(0-t )and 0.954 (0.875, 1.040) and 0.955 (0.876, 1.041) for C(max )for the 5.83 and 8.0 mg/mL formulations, respectively. No significant differences between the three treatments in half-lives, time to reach C(max), clearance or volume of distribution were observed. After injection, the most common side-effects were pain or injection-site reactions (all of mild intensity). There were no clinically significant abnormal vital signs, ECG or laboratory findings. There were 56 treatment-related adverse events (AEs): 49 mild, 6 moderate and 1 severe (vomiting). No serious AEs occurred. The pattern of AEs was as expected and all resolved by study end. CONCLUSION: Both concentrations of a new liquid multi-dose formulation are bioequivalent to the FD reference formulation and all are well tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01034735. BioMed Central 2010-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2987775/ /pubmed/20961422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-10-14 Text en Copyright ©2010 Liedert et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liedert, Bernd
Forssmann, Ulf
Wolna, Peter
Golob, Michaela
Kovar, Andreas
Comparison of the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of two concentrations of a new liquid recombinant human growth hormone formulation versus the freeze-dried formulation
title Comparison of the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of two concentrations of a new liquid recombinant human growth hormone formulation versus the freeze-dried formulation
title_full Comparison of the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of two concentrations of a new liquid recombinant human growth hormone formulation versus the freeze-dried formulation
title_fullStr Comparison of the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of two concentrations of a new liquid recombinant human growth hormone formulation versus the freeze-dried formulation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of two concentrations of a new liquid recombinant human growth hormone formulation versus the freeze-dried formulation
title_short Comparison of the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of two concentrations of a new liquid recombinant human growth hormone formulation versus the freeze-dried formulation
title_sort comparison of the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of two concentrations of a new liquid recombinant human growth hormone formulation versus the freeze-dried formulation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2987775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20961422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-10-14
work_keys_str_mv AT liedertbernd comparisonofthepharmacokineticssafetyandtolerabilityoftwoconcentrationsofanewliquidrecombinanthumangrowthhormoneformulationversusthefreezedriedformulation
AT forssmannulf comparisonofthepharmacokineticssafetyandtolerabilityoftwoconcentrationsofanewliquidrecombinanthumangrowthhormoneformulationversusthefreezedriedformulation
AT wolnapeter comparisonofthepharmacokineticssafetyandtolerabilityoftwoconcentrationsofanewliquidrecombinanthumangrowthhormoneformulationversusthefreezedriedformulation
AT golobmichaela comparisonofthepharmacokineticssafetyandtolerabilityoftwoconcentrationsofanewliquidrecombinanthumangrowthhormoneformulationversusthefreezedriedformulation
AT kovarandreas comparisonofthepharmacokineticssafetyandtolerabilityoftwoconcentrationsofanewliquidrecombinanthumangrowthhormoneformulationversusthefreezedriedformulation