Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of a screening strategy for Q fever among pregnant women in risk areas: a clustered randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: In The Netherlands the largest human Q fever outbreak ever reported in the literature is currently ongoing with more than 2300 notified cases in 2009. Pregnant women are particularly at risk as Q fever during pregnancy may cause maternal and obstetric complications. Since the majority of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2987891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21040534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-10-32 |
_version_ | 1782192178632589312 |
---|---|
author | Munster, Janna M Leenders, Alexander CAP van der Hoek, Wim Schneeberger, Peter M Rietveld, Ariene Riphagen-Dalhuisen, Josien Stolk, Ronald P Hamilton, Carl JCM de Vries, Esther Meekelenkamp, Jamie Lo-Ten-Foe, Jerome R Timmer, Albertus De Jong - van den Berg, Lolkje TW Aarnoudse, Jan G Hak, Eelko |
author_facet | Munster, Janna M Leenders, Alexander CAP van der Hoek, Wim Schneeberger, Peter M Rietveld, Ariene Riphagen-Dalhuisen, Josien Stolk, Ronald P Hamilton, Carl JCM de Vries, Esther Meekelenkamp, Jamie Lo-Ten-Foe, Jerome R Timmer, Albertus De Jong - van den Berg, Lolkje TW Aarnoudse, Jan G Hak, Eelko |
author_sort | Munster, Janna M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In The Netherlands the largest human Q fever outbreak ever reported in the literature is currently ongoing with more than 2300 notified cases in 2009. Pregnant women are particularly at risk as Q fever during pregnancy may cause maternal and obstetric complications. Since the majority of infected pregnant women are asymptomatic, a screening strategy might be of great value to reduce Q fever related complications. We designed a trial to assess the (cost-)effectiveness of a screening program for Q fever in pregnant women living in risks areas in The Netherlands. METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct a clustered randomized controlled trial in which primary care midwife centres in Q fever risk areas are randomized to recruit pregnant women for either the control group or the intervention group. In both groups a blood sample is taken around 20 weeks postmenstrual age. In the intervention group, this sample is immediately analyzed by indirect immunofluorescence assay for detection of IgG and IgM antibodies using a sensitive cut-off level of 1:32. In case of an active Q fever infection, antibiotic treatment is recommended and serological follow up is performed. In the control group, serum is frozen for analysis after delivery. The primary endpoint is a maternal (chronic Q fever or reactivation) or obstetric complication (low birth weight, preterm delivery or fetal death) in Q fever positive women. Secondary aims pertain to the course of infection in pregnant women, diagnostic accuracy of laboratory tests used for screening, histo-pathological abnormalities of the placenta of Q fever positive women, side effects of therapy, and costs. The analysis will be according to the intention-to-screen principle, and cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed by comparing the direct and indirect costs between the intervention and control group. DISCUSSION: With this study we aim to provide insight into the balance of risks of undetected and detected Q fever during pregnancy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, protocol record NL30340.042.09. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2987891 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29878912010-11-19 Cost-effectiveness of a screening strategy for Q fever among pregnant women in risk areas: a clustered randomized controlled trial Munster, Janna M Leenders, Alexander CAP van der Hoek, Wim Schneeberger, Peter M Rietveld, Ariene Riphagen-Dalhuisen, Josien Stolk, Ronald P Hamilton, Carl JCM de Vries, Esther Meekelenkamp, Jamie Lo-Ten-Foe, Jerome R Timmer, Albertus De Jong - van den Berg, Lolkje TW Aarnoudse, Jan G Hak, Eelko BMC Womens Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In The Netherlands the largest human Q fever outbreak ever reported in the literature is currently ongoing with more than 2300 notified cases in 2009. Pregnant women are particularly at risk as Q fever during pregnancy may cause maternal and obstetric complications. Since the majority of infected pregnant women are asymptomatic, a screening strategy might be of great value to reduce Q fever related complications. We designed a trial to assess the (cost-)effectiveness of a screening program for Q fever in pregnant women living in risks areas in The Netherlands. METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct a clustered randomized controlled trial in which primary care midwife centres in Q fever risk areas are randomized to recruit pregnant women for either the control group or the intervention group. In both groups a blood sample is taken around 20 weeks postmenstrual age. In the intervention group, this sample is immediately analyzed by indirect immunofluorescence assay for detection of IgG and IgM antibodies using a sensitive cut-off level of 1:32. In case of an active Q fever infection, antibiotic treatment is recommended and serological follow up is performed. In the control group, serum is frozen for analysis after delivery. The primary endpoint is a maternal (chronic Q fever or reactivation) or obstetric complication (low birth weight, preterm delivery or fetal death) in Q fever positive women. Secondary aims pertain to the course of infection in pregnant women, diagnostic accuracy of laboratory tests used for screening, histo-pathological abnormalities of the placenta of Q fever positive women, side effects of therapy, and costs. The analysis will be according to the intention-to-screen principle, and cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed by comparing the direct and indirect costs between the intervention and control group. DISCUSSION: With this study we aim to provide insight into the balance of risks of undetected and detected Q fever during pregnancy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, protocol record NL30340.042.09. BioMed Central 2010-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2987891/ /pubmed/21040534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-10-32 Text en Copyright ©2010 Munster et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Munster, Janna M Leenders, Alexander CAP van der Hoek, Wim Schneeberger, Peter M Rietveld, Ariene Riphagen-Dalhuisen, Josien Stolk, Ronald P Hamilton, Carl JCM de Vries, Esther Meekelenkamp, Jamie Lo-Ten-Foe, Jerome R Timmer, Albertus De Jong - van den Berg, Lolkje TW Aarnoudse, Jan G Hak, Eelko Cost-effectiveness of a screening strategy for Q fever among pregnant women in risk areas: a clustered randomized controlled trial |
title | Cost-effectiveness of a screening strategy for Q fever among pregnant women in risk areas: a clustered randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of a screening strategy for Q fever among pregnant women in risk areas: a clustered randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of a screening strategy for Q fever among pregnant women in risk areas: a clustered randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of a screening strategy for Q fever among pregnant women in risk areas: a clustered randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of a screening strategy for Q fever among pregnant women in risk areas: a clustered randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of a screening strategy for q fever among pregnant women in risk areas: a clustered randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2987891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21040534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-10-32 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT munsterjannam costeffectivenessofascreeningstrategyforqfeveramongpregnantwomeninriskareasaclusteredrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leendersalexandercap costeffectivenessofascreeningstrategyforqfeveramongpregnantwomeninriskareasaclusteredrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanderhoekwim costeffectivenessofascreeningstrategyforqfeveramongpregnantwomeninriskareasaclusteredrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schneebergerpeterm costeffectivenessofascreeningstrategyforqfeveramongpregnantwomeninriskareasaclusteredrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rietveldariene costeffectivenessofascreeningstrategyforqfeveramongpregnantwomeninriskareasaclusteredrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT riphagendalhuisenjosien costeffectivenessofascreeningstrategyforqfeveramongpregnantwomeninriskareasaclusteredrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT stolkronaldp costeffectivenessofascreeningstrategyforqfeveramongpregnantwomeninriskareasaclusteredrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hamiltoncarljcm costeffectivenessofascreeningstrategyforqfeveramongpregnantwomeninriskareasaclusteredrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT devriesesther costeffectivenessofascreeningstrategyforqfeveramongpregnantwomeninriskareasaclusteredrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT meekelenkampjamie costeffectivenessofascreeningstrategyforqfeveramongpregnantwomeninriskareasaclusteredrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lotenfoejeromer costeffectivenessofascreeningstrategyforqfeveramongpregnantwomeninriskareasaclusteredrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT timmeralbertus costeffectivenessofascreeningstrategyforqfeveramongpregnantwomeninriskareasaclusteredrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dejongvandenberglolkjetw costeffectivenessofascreeningstrategyforqfeveramongpregnantwomeninriskareasaclusteredrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT aarnoudsejang costeffectivenessofascreeningstrategyforqfeveramongpregnantwomeninriskareasaclusteredrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hakeelko costeffectivenessofascreeningstrategyforqfeveramongpregnantwomeninriskareasaclusteredrandomizedcontrolledtrial |