Cargando…

Is mitral valve repair superior to replacement for chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation with left ventricular dysfunction?

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to compare mitral valve repair and replacement as treatments for ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD). Specifically, we sought to determine whether the choice of mitral valve procedure affected survival, and discover which...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qiu, Zhibing, Chen, Xin, Xu, Ming, Jiang, Yingshuo, Xiao, Liqiong, Liu, LeLe, Wang, Liming
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2987923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21059216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-5-107
_version_ 1782192186454966272
author Qiu, Zhibing
Chen, Xin
Xu, Ming
Jiang, Yingshuo
Xiao, Liqiong
Liu, LeLe
Wang, Liming
author_facet Qiu, Zhibing
Chen, Xin
Xu, Ming
Jiang, Yingshuo
Xiao, Liqiong
Liu, LeLe
Wang, Liming
author_sort Qiu, Zhibing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to compare mitral valve repair and replacement as treatments for ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD). Specifically, we sought to determine whether the choice of mitral valve procedure affected survival, and discover which patients were predicted to benefit from mitral valve repair and which from replacement. METHODS: A total of 218 consecutive patients underwent either mitral valve repair (MVP, n = 112) or mitral valve replacement (MVR, n = 106). We retrospectively reviewed the clinical material, operation methods, echocardiography check during operation and follow-up. Patients details and follow-up outcomes were compared using multivariate and Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: No statistical difference was found between the two groups in term of intraoperative data. Early mortality was 3.2% (MVP 2.7% and MVR 3.8%). At discharge, Left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic diameter and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were improved more in the MVP group than MVR group (P < 0.05), however, in follow-up no statistically significant difference was observed between the MVR and MVP group (P > 0.05). Follow-up mitral regurgitation grade was significantly improved in the MVR group compared with the MVP group (P < 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier survival estimates at 1, 3, and 5 years were simlar between MVP and MVR group. Logistic regression revealed poor survival was associated with old age(#75), preoperative renal insufficiency and low left ventricular ejection fraction (< 30%). CONCLUSION: Mitral valve repair is the procedure of choice in the majority of patients having surgery for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation with left ventricular dysfunction. Early results of MVP treatment seem to be satisfactory, but several lines of data indicate that mitral valve repair provided less long-term benefit than mitral valve replacement in the LVD patients.
format Text
id pubmed-2987923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29879232010-11-19 Is mitral valve repair superior to replacement for chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation with left ventricular dysfunction? Qiu, Zhibing Chen, Xin Xu, Ming Jiang, Yingshuo Xiao, Liqiong Liu, LeLe Wang, Liming J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to compare mitral valve repair and replacement as treatments for ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD). Specifically, we sought to determine whether the choice of mitral valve procedure affected survival, and discover which patients were predicted to benefit from mitral valve repair and which from replacement. METHODS: A total of 218 consecutive patients underwent either mitral valve repair (MVP, n = 112) or mitral valve replacement (MVR, n = 106). We retrospectively reviewed the clinical material, operation methods, echocardiography check during operation and follow-up. Patients details and follow-up outcomes were compared using multivariate and Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: No statistical difference was found between the two groups in term of intraoperative data. Early mortality was 3.2% (MVP 2.7% and MVR 3.8%). At discharge, Left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic diameter and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were improved more in the MVP group than MVR group (P < 0.05), however, in follow-up no statistically significant difference was observed between the MVR and MVP group (P > 0.05). Follow-up mitral regurgitation grade was significantly improved in the MVR group compared with the MVP group (P < 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier survival estimates at 1, 3, and 5 years were simlar between MVP and MVR group. Logistic regression revealed poor survival was associated with old age(#75), preoperative renal insufficiency and low left ventricular ejection fraction (< 30%). CONCLUSION: Mitral valve repair is the procedure of choice in the majority of patients having surgery for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation with left ventricular dysfunction. Early results of MVP treatment seem to be satisfactory, but several lines of data indicate that mitral valve repair provided less long-term benefit than mitral valve replacement in the LVD patients. BioMed Central 2010-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2987923/ /pubmed/21059216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-5-107 Text en Copyright ©2010 Qiu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Qiu, Zhibing
Chen, Xin
Xu, Ming
Jiang, Yingshuo
Xiao, Liqiong
Liu, LeLe
Wang, Liming
Is mitral valve repair superior to replacement for chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation with left ventricular dysfunction?
title Is mitral valve repair superior to replacement for chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation with left ventricular dysfunction?
title_full Is mitral valve repair superior to replacement for chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation with left ventricular dysfunction?
title_fullStr Is mitral valve repair superior to replacement for chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation with left ventricular dysfunction?
title_full_unstemmed Is mitral valve repair superior to replacement for chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation with left ventricular dysfunction?
title_short Is mitral valve repair superior to replacement for chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation with left ventricular dysfunction?
title_sort is mitral valve repair superior to replacement for chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation with left ventricular dysfunction?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2987923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21059216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-5-107
work_keys_str_mv AT qiuzhibing ismitralvalverepairsuperiortoreplacementforchronicischemicmitralregurgitationwithleftventriculardysfunction
AT chenxin ismitralvalverepairsuperiortoreplacementforchronicischemicmitralregurgitationwithleftventriculardysfunction
AT xuming ismitralvalverepairsuperiortoreplacementforchronicischemicmitralregurgitationwithleftventriculardysfunction
AT jiangyingshuo ismitralvalverepairsuperiortoreplacementforchronicischemicmitralregurgitationwithleftventriculardysfunction
AT xiaoliqiong ismitralvalverepairsuperiortoreplacementforchronicischemicmitralregurgitationwithleftventriculardysfunction
AT liulele ismitralvalverepairsuperiortoreplacementforchronicischemicmitralregurgitationwithleftventriculardysfunction
AT wangliming ismitralvalverepairsuperiortoreplacementforchronicischemicmitralregurgitationwithleftventriculardysfunction