Cargando…
LumbSten: The lumbar spinal stenosis outcome study
BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal stenosis is the most frequent reason for spinal surgery in elderly people. For patients with moderate or severe symptoms different conservative and surgical treatment modalities are recommended, but knowledge about the effectiveness, in particular of the conservative treatm...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2987977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21044326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-254 |
_version_ | 1782192199414317056 |
---|---|
author | Steurer, Johann Nydegger, Alexander Held, Ulrike Brunner, Florian Hodler, Jürg Porchet, François Min, Kan Mannion, Anne F Michel, Beat |
author_facet | Steurer, Johann Nydegger, Alexander Held, Ulrike Brunner, Florian Hodler, Jürg Porchet, François Min, Kan Mannion, Anne F Michel, Beat |
author_sort | Steurer, Johann |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal stenosis is the most frequent reason for spinal surgery in elderly people. For patients with moderate or severe symptoms different conservative and surgical treatment modalities are recommended, but knowledge about the effectiveness, in particular of the conservative treatments, is scarce. There is some evidence that surgery improves outcome in about two thirds of the patients. The aims of this study are to derive and validate a prognostic prediction aid to estimate the probability of clinically relevant improvement after surgery and to gain more knowledge about the future course of patients treated by conservative treatment modalities. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a prospective, multi-centre cohort study within four hospitals of Zurich, Switzerland. We will enroll patients with neurogenic claudication and lumbar spinal stenosis verified by Computer Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Participating in the study will have no influence on treatment modality. Clinical data, including relevant prognostic data, will be collected at baseline and the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire will be used to quantify severity of symptoms, physical function characteristics, and patient's satisfaction after treatment (primary outcome). Data on outcome will be collected 6 weeks, and 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after inclusion in the study. Applying multivariable statistical methods, a prediction rule to estimate the course after surgery will be derived. DISCUSSION: The ultimate goal of the study is to facilitate optimal, knowledge based and individualized treatment recommendations for patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2987977 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29879772010-11-19 LumbSten: The lumbar spinal stenosis outcome study Steurer, Johann Nydegger, Alexander Held, Ulrike Brunner, Florian Hodler, Jürg Porchet, François Min, Kan Mannion, Anne F Michel, Beat BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal stenosis is the most frequent reason for spinal surgery in elderly people. For patients with moderate or severe symptoms different conservative and surgical treatment modalities are recommended, but knowledge about the effectiveness, in particular of the conservative treatments, is scarce. There is some evidence that surgery improves outcome in about two thirds of the patients. The aims of this study are to derive and validate a prognostic prediction aid to estimate the probability of clinically relevant improvement after surgery and to gain more knowledge about the future course of patients treated by conservative treatment modalities. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a prospective, multi-centre cohort study within four hospitals of Zurich, Switzerland. We will enroll patients with neurogenic claudication and lumbar spinal stenosis verified by Computer Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Participating in the study will have no influence on treatment modality. Clinical data, including relevant prognostic data, will be collected at baseline and the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire will be used to quantify severity of symptoms, physical function characteristics, and patient's satisfaction after treatment (primary outcome). Data on outcome will be collected 6 weeks, and 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after inclusion in the study. Applying multivariable statistical methods, a prediction rule to estimate the course after surgery will be derived. DISCUSSION: The ultimate goal of the study is to facilitate optimal, knowledge based and individualized treatment recommendations for patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. BioMed Central 2010-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2987977/ /pubmed/21044326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-254 Text en Copyright ©2010 Steurer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Steurer, Johann Nydegger, Alexander Held, Ulrike Brunner, Florian Hodler, Jürg Porchet, François Min, Kan Mannion, Anne F Michel, Beat LumbSten: The lumbar spinal stenosis outcome study |
title | LumbSten: The lumbar spinal stenosis outcome study |
title_full | LumbSten: The lumbar spinal stenosis outcome study |
title_fullStr | LumbSten: The lumbar spinal stenosis outcome study |
title_full_unstemmed | LumbSten: The lumbar spinal stenosis outcome study |
title_short | LumbSten: The lumbar spinal stenosis outcome study |
title_sort | lumbsten: the lumbar spinal stenosis outcome study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2987977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21044326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-254 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steurerjohann lumbstenthelumbarspinalstenosisoutcomestudy AT nydeggeralexander lumbstenthelumbarspinalstenosisoutcomestudy AT heldulrike lumbstenthelumbarspinalstenosisoutcomestudy AT brunnerflorian lumbstenthelumbarspinalstenosisoutcomestudy AT hodlerjurg lumbstenthelumbarspinalstenosisoutcomestudy AT porchetfrancois lumbstenthelumbarspinalstenosisoutcomestudy AT minkan lumbstenthelumbarspinalstenosisoutcomestudy AT mannionannef lumbstenthelumbarspinalstenosisoutcomestudy AT michelbeat lumbstenthelumbarspinalstenosisoutcomestudy |