Cargando…

Injection therapy and denervation procedures for chronic low-back pain: a systematic review

Injection therapy and denervation procedures are commonly used in the management of chronic low-back pain (LBP) despite uncertainty regarding their effectiveness and safety. To provide an evaluation of the current evidence associated with the use of these procedures, a systematic review was performe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henschke, Nicholas, Kuijpers, Ton, Rubinstein, Sidney M., van Middelkoop, Marienke, Ostelo, Raymond, Verhagen, Arianne, Koes, Bart W., van Tulder, Maurits W.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2989278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20424870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1411-0
_version_ 1782192339606831104
author Henschke, Nicholas
Kuijpers, Ton
Rubinstein, Sidney M.
van Middelkoop, Marienke
Ostelo, Raymond
Verhagen, Arianne
Koes, Bart W.
van Tulder, Maurits W.
author_facet Henschke, Nicholas
Kuijpers, Ton
Rubinstein, Sidney M.
van Middelkoop, Marienke
Ostelo, Raymond
Verhagen, Arianne
Koes, Bart W.
van Tulder, Maurits W.
author_sort Henschke, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description Injection therapy and denervation procedures are commonly used in the management of chronic low-back pain (LBP) despite uncertainty regarding their effectiveness and safety. To provide an evaluation of the current evidence associated with the use of these procedures, a systematic review was performed. Existing systematic reviews were screened, and the Cochrane Back Review Group trial register was searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Studies were included if they recruited adults with chronic LBP, evaluated the use of injection therapy or denervation procedures and measured at least one clinically relevant outcome (such as pain or functional status). Two review authors independently assessed studies for eligibility and risk of bias (RoB). A meta-analysis was performed with clinically homogeneous studies, and the GRADE approach was used to determine the quality of evidence. In total, 27 RCTs were included, 14 on injection therapy and 13 on denervation procedures. 18 (66%) of the studies were determined to have a low RoB. Because of clinical heterogeneity, only two comparisons could be pooled. Overall, there is only low to very low quality evidence to support the use of injection therapy and denervation procedures over placebo or other treatments for patients with chronic LBP. However, it cannot be ruled out that in carefully selected patients, some injection therapy or denervation procedures may be of benefit.
format Text
id pubmed-2989278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29892782011-01-24 Injection therapy and denervation procedures for chronic low-back pain: a systematic review Henschke, Nicholas Kuijpers, Ton Rubinstein, Sidney M. van Middelkoop, Marienke Ostelo, Raymond Verhagen, Arianne Koes, Bart W. van Tulder, Maurits W. Eur Spine J Review Article Injection therapy and denervation procedures are commonly used in the management of chronic low-back pain (LBP) despite uncertainty regarding their effectiveness and safety. To provide an evaluation of the current evidence associated with the use of these procedures, a systematic review was performed. Existing systematic reviews were screened, and the Cochrane Back Review Group trial register was searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Studies were included if they recruited adults with chronic LBP, evaluated the use of injection therapy or denervation procedures and measured at least one clinically relevant outcome (such as pain or functional status). Two review authors independently assessed studies for eligibility and risk of bias (RoB). A meta-analysis was performed with clinically homogeneous studies, and the GRADE approach was used to determine the quality of evidence. In total, 27 RCTs were included, 14 on injection therapy and 13 on denervation procedures. 18 (66%) of the studies were determined to have a low RoB. Because of clinical heterogeneity, only two comparisons could be pooled. Overall, there is only low to very low quality evidence to support the use of injection therapy and denervation procedures over placebo or other treatments for patients with chronic LBP. However, it cannot be ruled out that in carefully selected patients, some injection therapy or denervation procedures may be of benefit. Springer-Verlag 2010-04-29 2010-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2989278/ /pubmed/20424870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1411-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Henschke, Nicholas
Kuijpers, Ton
Rubinstein, Sidney M.
van Middelkoop, Marienke
Ostelo, Raymond
Verhagen, Arianne
Koes, Bart W.
van Tulder, Maurits W.
Injection therapy and denervation procedures for chronic low-back pain: a systematic review
title Injection therapy and denervation procedures for chronic low-back pain: a systematic review
title_full Injection therapy and denervation procedures for chronic low-back pain: a systematic review
title_fullStr Injection therapy and denervation procedures for chronic low-back pain: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Injection therapy and denervation procedures for chronic low-back pain: a systematic review
title_short Injection therapy and denervation procedures for chronic low-back pain: a systematic review
title_sort injection therapy and denervation procedures for chronic low-back pain: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2989278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20424870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1411-0
work_keys_str_mv AT henschkenicholas injectiontherapyanddenervationproceduresforchroniclowbackpainasystematicreview
AT kuijperston injectiontherapyanddenervationproceduresforchroniclowbackpainasystematicreview
AT rubinsteinsidneym injectiontherapyanddenervationproceduresforchroniclowbackpainasystematicreview
AT vanmiddelkoopmarienke injectiontherapyanddenervationproceduresforchroniclowbackpainasystematicreview
AT osteloraymond injectiontherapyanddenervationproceduresforchroniclowbackpainasystematicreview
AT verhagenarianne injectiontherapyanddenervationproceduresforchroniclowbackpainasystematicreview
AT koesbartw injectiontherapyanddenervationproceduresforchroniclowbackpainasystematicreview
AT vantuldermauritsw injectiontherapyanddenervationproceduresforchroniclowbackpainasystematicreview