Cargando…
Preferences of diabetes patients and physicians: A feasibility study to identify the key indicators for appraisal of health care values
BACKGROUND: Evidence-based medicine, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), support the inclusion of patients' preferences in health care decisions. In fact there are not many trials which include an assessment of patient'...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2989314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21050469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-125 |
_version_ | 1782192344517312512 |
---|---|
author | Porzsolt, Franz Clouth, Johannes Deutschmann, Marc Hippler, Hans-J |
author_facet | Porzsolt, Franz Clouth, Johannes Deutschmann, Marc Hippler, Hans-J |
author_sort | Porzsolt, Franz |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Evidence-based medicine, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), support the inclusion of patients' preferences in health care decisions. In fact there are not many trials which include an assessment of patient's preferences. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that preferences of physicians and of patients can be assessed and that this information may be helpful for medical decision making. METHOD: One of the established methods for assessment of preferences is the conjoint analysis. Conjoint analysis, in combination with a computer assisted telephone interview (CATI), was used to collect data from 827 diabetes patients and 60 physicians, which describe the preferences expressed as levels of four factors in the management and outcome of the disease. The first factor described the main treatment effect (reduction of elevated Hb(A1c), improved well-being, absence of side effects, and no limitations of daily life). The second factor described the effect on the body weight (gain, no change, reduction). The third factor analyzed the mode of application (linked to meals or flexible application). The fourth factor addressed the type of product (original brand or generic product). Utility values were scaled and normalized in a way that the sum of utility points across all levels is equal to the number of attributes (factors) times 100. RESULTS: The preference weights confirm that the reduction of body weight is at least as important for patients - especially obese patients - and physicians as the reduction of an elevated Hb(A1c). Original products were preferred by patients while general practitioners preferred generic products. CONCLUSION: Using the example of diabetes, the difference between patients' and physicians' preferences can be assessed. The use of a conjoint analysis in combination with CATI seems to be an effective approach for generation of data which are needed for policy and medical decision making in health care. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2989314 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29893142010-11-21 Preferences of diabetes patients and physicians: A feasibility study to identify the key indicators for appraisal of health care values Porzsolt, Franz Clouth, Johannes Deutschmann, Marc Hippler, Hans-J Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Evidence-based medicine, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), support the inclusion of patients' preferences in health care decisions. In fact there are not many trials which include an assessment of patient's preferences. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that preferences of physicians and of patients can be assessed and that this information may be helpful for medical decision making. METHOD: One of the established methods for assessment of preferences is the conjoint analysis. Conjoint analysis, in combination with a computer assisted telephone interview (CATI), was used to collect data from 827 diabetes patients and 60 physicians, which describe the preferences expressed as levels of four factors in the management and outcome of the disease. The first factor described the main treatment effect (reduction of elevated Hb(A1c), improved well-being, absence of side effects, and no limitations of daily life). The second factor described the effect on the body weight (gain, no change, reduction). The third factor analyzed the mode of application (linked to meals or flexible application). The fourth factor addressed the type of product (original brand or generic product). Utility values were scaled and normalized in a way that the sum of utility points across all levels is equal to the number of attributes (factors) times 100. RESULTS: The preference weights confirm that the reduction of body weight is at least as important for patients - especially obese patients - and physicians as the reduction of an elevated Hb(A1c). Original products were preferred by patients while general practitioners preferred generic products. CONCLUSION: Using the example of diabetes, the difference between patients' and physicians' preferences can be assessed. The use of a conjoint analysis in combination with CATI seems to be an effective approach for generation of data which are needed for policy and medical decision making in health care. BioMed Central 2010-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2989314/ /pubmed/21050469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-125 Text en Copyright ©2010 Porzsolt et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Porzsolt, Franz Clouth, Johannes Deutschmann, Marc Hippler, Hans-J Preferences of diabetes patients and physicians: A feasibility study to identify the key indicators for appraisal of health care values |
title | Preferences of diabetes patients and physicians: A feasibility study to identify the key indicators for appraisal of health care values |
title_full | Preferences of diabetes patients and physicians: A feasibility study to identify the key indicators for appraisal of health care values |
title_fullStr | Preferences of diabetes patients and physicians: A feasibility study to identify the key indicators for appraisal of health care values |
title_full_unstemmed | Preferences of diabetes patients and physicians: A feasibility study to identify the key indicators for appraisal of health care values |
title_short | Preferences of diabetes patients and physicians: A feasibility study to identify the key indicators for appraisal of health care values |
title_sort | preferences of diabetes patients and physicians: a feasibility study to identify the key indicators for appraisal of health care values |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2989314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21050469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-125 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT porzsoltfranz preferencesofdiabetespatientsandphysiciansafeasibilitystudytoidentifythekeyindicatorsforappraisalofhealthcarevalues AT clouthjohannes preferencesofdiabetespatientsandphysiciansafeasibilitystudytoidentifythekeyindicatorsforappraisalofhealthcarevalues AT deutschmannmarc preferencesofdiabetespatientsandphysiciansafeasibilitystudytoidentifythekeyindicatorsforappraisalofhealthcarevalues AT hipplerhansj preferencesofdiabetespatientsandphysiciansafeasibilitystudytoidentifythekeyindicatorsforappraisalofhealthcarevalues |