Cargando…

Evaluation of two novel thoracolumbar trauma classification systems

BACKGROUND: Despite numerous attempts at classifying thoracolumbar spinal injuries, there remains no consensus on a single unifying algorithm of management. The ideal system should provide diagnostic and prognostic information, exhibit adequate reliability and validity and be easily applicable to cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Alpesh A, Whang, Peter G, Brodke, Darrel S, Agarwal, Amit, Hong, Joseph, Fernandez, Carmella, Vaccaro, Alexander R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2989501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21139786
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.36995
_version_ 1782192358613319680
author Patel, Alpesh A
Whang, Peter G
Brodke, Darrel S
Agarwal, Amit
Hong, Joseph
Fernandez, Carmella
Vaccaro, Alexander R
author_facet Patel, Alpesh A
Whang, Peter G
Brodke, Darrel S
Agarwal, Amit
Hong, Joseph
Fernandez, Carmella
Vaccaro, Alexander R
author_sort Patel, Alpesh A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite numerous attempts at classifying thoracolumbar spinal injuries, there remains no consensus on a single unifying algorithm of management. The ideal system should provide diagnostic and prognostic information, exhibit adequate reliability and validity and be easily applicable to clinical practice. The purpose of this study is to assess the reliability and validity of two novel classification systems for thoracolumbar fractures – the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score (TLISS) and the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) – and also to discuss potential efforts towards research in the future. MATEREIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-one patients with thoracolumbar fractures were prospectively assessed by surgeons with different levels of training and experience (attending orthopedic surgeon, attending neurosurgeon, spine fellows, senior level and junior level residents) at a single institution. Plain radiographs, CT and MRI imaging were used to classify these injuries using the TLISS system. Seven months later, 25 consecutive injuries were prospectively assessed with the TLISS and TLICS systems. Unweighted Cohen's kappa coefficients and Spearman's correlation values were calculated to assess inter-observer reliability and validity at each point in time. RESULTS: For both the TLISS and TLICS algorithms, the inter-rater kappa statistics for all of the subgroups demonstrated moderate-to-substantial reliability (0.45-0.74), although there were no significant differences among the shared subgroups. The kappa score of the TLISS system was greater than that of the TLICS system for injury mechanism/ morphology. Correlation values were also greater across all subgroups (P ≤0.01). Statistically significant improvements in TLISS inter-observer reliability were observed across all TLISS fields (P <0.05). The TLISS and TLICS schemes both demonstrated excellent validity. CONCLUSION: The TLISS and TLICS scales both exhibited substantial reliability and validity. However, the TLISS system displayed greater inter-observer correlation than did the TLICS and demonstrated significant improvements in reliability over time.
format Text
id pubmed-2989501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29895012010-12-07 Evaluation of two novel thoracolumbar trauma classification systems Patel, Alpesh A Whang, Peter G Brodke, Darrel S Agarwal, Amit Hong, Joseph Fernandez, Carmella Vaccaro, Alexander R Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: Despite numerous attempts at classifying thoracolumbar spinal injuries, there remains no consensus on a single unifying algorithm of management. The ideal system should provide diagnostic and prognostic information, exhibit adequate reliability and validity and be easily applicable to clinical practice. The purpose of this study is to assess the reliability and validity of two novel classification systems for thoracolumbar fractures – the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score (TLISS) and the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) – and also to discuss potential efforts towards research in the future. MATEREIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-one patients with thoracolumbar fractures were prospectively assessed by surgeons with different levels of training and experience (attending orthopedic surgeon, attending neurosurgeon, spine fellows, senior level and junior level residents) at a single institution. Plain radiographs, CT and MRI imaging were used to classify these injuries using the TLISS system. Seven months later, 25 consecutive injuries were prospectively assessed with the TLISS and TLICS systems. Unweighted Cohen's kappa coefficients and Spearman's correlation values were calculated to assess inter-observer reliability and validity at each point in time. RESULTS: For both the TLISS and TLICS algorithms, the inter-rater kappa statistics for all of the subgroups demonstrated moderate-to-substantial reliability (0.45-0.74), although there were no significant differences among the shared subgroups. The kappa score of the TLISS system was greater than that of the TLICS system for injury mechanism/ morphology. Correlation values were also greater across all subgroups (P ≤0.01). Statistically significant improvements in TLISS inter-observer reliability were observed across all TLISS fields (P <0.05). The TLISS and TLICS schemes both demonstrated excellent validity. CONCLUSION: The TLISS and TLICS scales both exhibited substantial reliability and validity. However, the TLISS system displayed greater inter-observer correlation than did the TLICS and demonstrated significant improvements in reliability over time. Medknow Publications 2007 /pmc/articles/PMC2989501/ /pubmed/21139786 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.36995 Text en © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Patel, Alpesh A
Whang, Peter G
Brodke, Darrel S
Agarwal, Amit
Hong, Joseph
Fernandez, Carmella
Vaccaro, Alexander R
Evaluation of two novel thoracolumbar trauma classification systems
title Evaluation of two novel thoracolumbar trauma classification systems
title_full Evaluation of two novel thoracolumbar trauma classification systems
title_fullStr Evaluation of two novel thoracolumbar trauma classification systems
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of two novel thoracolumbar trauma classification systems
title_short Evaluation of two novel thoracolumbar trauma classification systems
title_sort evaluation of two novel thoracolumbar trauma classification systems
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2989501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21139786
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.36995
work_keys_str_mv AT patelalpesha evaluationoftwonovelthoracolumbartraumaclassificationsystems
AT whangpeterg evaluationoftwonovelthoracolumbartraumaclassificationsystems
AT brodkedarrels evaluationoftwonovelthoracolumbartraumaclassificationsystems
AT agarwalamit evaluationoftwonovelthoracolumbartraumaclassificationsystems
AT hongjoseph evaluationoftwonovelthoracolumbartraumaclassificationsystems
AT fernandezcarmella evaluationoftwonovelthoracolumbartraumaclassificationsystems
AT vaccaroalexanderr evaluationoftwonovelthoracolumbartraumaclassificationsystems