Cargando…
Evaluation of two novel thoracolumbar trauma classification systems
BACKGROUND: Despite numerous attempts at classifying thoracolumbar spinal injuries, there remains no consensus on a single unifying algorithm of management. The ideal system should provide diagnostic and prognostic information, exhibit adequate reliability and validity and be easily applicable to cl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2989501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21139786 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.36995 |
_version_ | 1782192358613319680 |
---|---|
author | Patel, Alpesh A Whang, Peter G Brodke, Darrel S Agarwal, Amit Hong, Joseph Fernandez, Carmella Vaccaro, Alexander R |
author_facet | Patel, Alpesh A Whang, Peter G Brodke, Darrel S Agarwal, Amit Hong, Joseph Fernandez, Carmella Vaccaro, Alexander R |
author_sort | Patel, Alpesh A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite numerous attempts at classifying thoracolumbar spinal injuries, there remains no consensus on a single unifying algorithm of management. The ideal system should provide diagnostic and prognostic information, exhibit adequate reliability and validity and be easily applicable to clinical practice. The purpose of this study is to assess the reliability and validity of two novel classification systems for thoracolumbar fractures – the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score (TLISS) and the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) – and also to discuss potential efforts towards research in the future. MATEREIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-one patients with thoracolumbar fractures were prospectively assessed by surgeons with different levels of training and experience (attending orthopedic surgeon, attending neurosurgeon, spine fellows, senior level and junior level residents) at a single institution. Plain radiographs, CT and MRI imaging were used to classify these injuries using the TLISS system. Seven months later, 25 consecutive injuries were prospectively assessed with the TLISS and TLICS systems. Unweighted Cohen's kappa coefficients and Spearman's correlation values were calculated to assess inter-observer reliability and validity at each point in time. RESULTS: For both the TLISS and TLICS algorithms, the inter-rater kappa statistics for all of the subgroups demonstrated moderate-to-substantial reliability (0.45-0.74), although there were no significant differences among the shared subgroups. The kappa score of the TLISS system was greater than that of the TLICS system for injury mechanism/ morphology. Correlation values were also greater across all subgroups (P ≤0.01). Statistically significant improvements in TLISS inter-observer reliability were observed across all TLISS fields (P <0.05). The TLISS and TLICS schemes both demonstrated excellent validity. CONCLUSION: The TLISS and TLICS scales both exhibited substantial reliability and validity. However, the TLISS system displayed greater inter-observer correlation than did the TLICS and demonstrated significant improvements in reliability over time. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2989501 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29895012010-12-07 Evaluation of two novel thoracolumbar trauma classification systems Patel, Alpesh A Whang, Peter G Brodke, Darrel S Agarwal, Amit Hong, Joseph Fernandez, Carmella Vaccaro, Alexander R Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: Despite numerous attempts at classifying thoracolumbar spinal injuries, there remains no consensus on a single unifying algorithm of management. The ideal system should provide diagnostic and prognostic information, exhibit adequate reliability and validity and be easily applicable to clinical practice. The purpose of this study is to assess the reliability and validity of two novel classification systems for thoracolumbar fractures – the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score (TLISS) and the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) – and also to discuss potential efforts towards research in the future. MATEREIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-one patients with thoracolumbar fractures were prospectively assessed by surgeons with different levels of training and experience (attending orthopedic surgeon, attending neurosurgeon, spine fellows, senior level and junior level residents) at a single institution. Plain radiographs, CT and MRI imaging were used to classify these injuries using the TLISS system. Seven months later, 25 consecutive injuries were prospectively assessed with the TLISS and TLICS systems. Unweighted Cohen's kappa coefficients and Spearman's correlation values were calculated to assess inter-observer reliability and validity at each point in time. RESULTS: For both the TLISS and TLICS algorithms, the inter-rater kappa statistics for all of the subgroups demonstrated moderate-to-substantial reliability (0.45-0.74), although there were no significant differences among the shared subgroups. The kappa score of the TLISS system was greater than that of the TLICS system for injury mechanism/ morphology. Correlation values were also greater across all subgroups (P ≤0.01). Statistically significant improvements in TLISS inter-observer reliability were observed across all TLISS fields (P <0.05). The TLISS and TLICS schemes both demonstrated excellent validity. CONCLUSION: The TLISS and TLICS scales both exhibited substantial reliability and validity. However, the TLISS system displayed greater inter-observer correlation than did the TLICS and demonstrated significant improvements in reliability over time. Medknow Publications 2007 /pmc/articles/PMC2989501/ /pubmed/21139786 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.36995 Text en © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Patel, Alpesh A Whang, Peter G Brodke, Darrel S Agarwal, Amit Hong, Joseph Fernandez, Carmella Vaccaro, Alexander R Evaluation of two novel thoracolumbar trauma classification systems |
title | Evaluation of two novel thoracolumbar trauma classification systems |
title_full | Evaluation of two novel thoracolumbar trauma classification systems |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of two novel thoracolumbar trauma classification systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of two novel thoracolumbar trauma classification systems |
title_short | Evaluation of two novel thoracolumbar trauma classification systems |
title_sort | evaluation of two novel thoracolumbar trauma classification systems |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2989501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21139786 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.36995 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patelalpesha evaluationoftwonovelthoracolumbartraumaclassificationsystems AT whangpeterg evaluationoftwonovelthoracolumbartraumaclassificationsystems AT brodkedarrels evaluationoftwonovelthoracolumbartraumaclassificationsystems AT agarwalamit evaluationoftwonovelthoracolumbartraumaclassificationsystems AT hongjoseph evaluationoftwonovelthoracolumbartraumaclassificationsystems AT fernandezcarmella evaluationoftwonovelthoracolumbartraumaclassificationsystems AT vaccaroalexanderr evaluationoftwonovelthoracolumbartraumaclassificationsystems |